UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTIONProxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) OF THEof the

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFSecurities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                 Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted byRule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.under § 240.14a-12

AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

 

No fee required.required

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

 

Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange ActRules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.0-11

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies.

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies.

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction.

(5)

Total fee paid.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid.

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration State No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 


LOGO

2 Pembroke House77 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Block C

Upper Pembroke Street28-32,Grand Canal Docklands, Dublin 2, Ireland

(Registered in England & Wales under Company No. 2353920)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Amarin Corporation plc, a public limited company registered in England and Wales (the “Company”), will be held at The Merrion Hotel, Upper Merrion Street,the Dublin offices of Arthur Cox LLP, Ten Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, D02 T380, Ireland, on May 20, 2019June 27, 2022 at 2:3:00 p.m. local time for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, passing the following resolutions, all of which Resolutions1-5 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and Resolution 6 will be proposedresolutions:

1.    To re-elect Mr. Karim Mikhail as a special resolution:director;

2.    To re-elect Mr. Per Wold-Olsen as a director;

1.

Tore-elect Mr. Jan van Heek as a director;

3.    To re-elect Ms. Erin Enright as a director;

2.

Tore-elect Ms. Kristine Peterson as a director;

4.    To re-elect Mr. Alfonso Zulueta as a director;

3.

To hold an advisory(non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers” as described in full in the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure on pages 25 to 55 of the accompanying Proxy Statement;

5.    To hold an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers” as described in full in the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure on pages 34 to 49 of the accompanying Proxy Statement;

4.

To appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditors of the Company to hold office until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid before the Company and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company to fix the auditors’ remuneration as described in full on pages 9 to 10 of the accompanying Proxy Statement;

6.    To appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditors of the Company to hold office until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid before the Company and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company to fix the auditors’ remuneration as described in full on pages 11 to 12 of the accompanying Proxy Statement; and

5.

To generally and unconditionally reauthorize the Board of Directors of the Company to exercise all powers of the Company to allot shares in the Company or grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares of the Company up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000 (being the aggregate nominal amount of £125,000,000 in respect of ordinary shares and £23,000,000 in respect of preference shares) as described in full on pages 11 to 12 of the accompanying Proxy Statement; and

6.

To, subject to the passing of Resolution No. 5, disapply statutorypre-emption rights otherwise applicable to shares in the Company allotted by the Board of Directors, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000 (being the aggregate nominal amount of £125,000,000 in respect of ordinary shares and £23,000,000 in respect of preference shares) as described in full on pages 13 to 147.    To adopt and approve the proposed amendment to the Company’s 2020 Stock Incentive Plan as described on pages 13 to 21 of the accompanying Proxy Statement.

Additional Business

As a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, it is a statutory requirement that the Board of Directors of the Company lay before the Annual General Meeting the Company’s statutory accounts, which are those accounts included in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 20182021 as prepared in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “Annual Report”) and the accounts for the financial year ended December 31, 20182021 prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. The Company does not expect that other items of business will be considered at the Annual General Meeting.

Only shareholders who held shares at the close of business on the record date, April 11, 2019,May 4, 2022, may vote at the Annual General Meeting, including any adjournment or postponement thereof. The accompanying Proxy Statement more fully describes the details of the business to be conducted at the Annual General Meeting. After careful consideration, our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the proposals and recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee and FOR each other proposal described in the Proxy Statement.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 2 Pembroke House, Upper Pembroke Street28-32,77 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Block C, Grand Canal Docklands, Dublin 2, Ireland. The registered office of Amarin Corporation plcthe Company is One New Change, London EC4M 9AF, England. A copy of the Company’s Annual Report accompanies this Notice and the enclosed Proxy Statement.


As a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales and pursuant to the Company’s Articles of Association, the presence, in person or by proxy, of at least two shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual General Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual General Meeting. Consistent with the marketplace rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we will seek to ensure that the two shareholders present at the meeting in person or by proxy represent at least one-third of our outstanding shares of voting stock.

COVID-19

As at the date of this Notice, having regard to the current status of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the lifting of legal restrictions by the Irish Government, the Board intends for the Annual General Meeting to take place in person. However, given the continued uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the possibility of new measures and restrictions being imposed in Ireland in the future, shareholders are strongly encouraged to appoint the Chairman of the meeting as your proxy through the process described in this Proxy Statement to ensure your vote is counted on the proposed resolutions.

If you plan to attend the Annual General Meeting in person, please notify the Company in advance by e-mail to annual.general.meeting@amarincorp.com to assist the Company with planning and implementing arrangements for the Annual General Meeting. Please do not attend the Annual General Meeting in person if you have symptoms of or have tested positive for COVID-19. Any person attempting to attend the Annual General Meeting in person and displaying COVID-19 symptoms may not be permitted to enter the meeting to ensure the health and wellbeing of all other attendees. The Board may also adopt other measures that it considers appropriate to address any health and safety concerns, as may the operators of the venue of the Annual General Meeting.

The situation with respect to COVID-19 continues to evolve, and we are actively monitoring the situation as part of our effort to maintain a healthy and safe environment at the Annual General Meeting. If the arrangements for our Annual General Meeting change materially, we will issue a further communication through a Form 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and on our website at http://investor.amarincorp.com.

Important Notice of Internet Availability. The accompanying Proxy Statement, Form of Proxy and Annual Report will also be available to the public athttp://investor.amarincorp.com.

We look forward to seeing you at the Annual General Meeting.

 

Sincerely,

/s/ John F. TheroLOGO

John F. TheroKarim Mikhail
President and Chief Executive Officer

April 25, 2019May 24, 2022

 

WHETHER OR NOTIN LIGHT OF THE ONGOING COVID-19 PANDEMIC, WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD USING THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING. EVEN IF YOU HAVE VOTED BY PROXY, YOU MAY STILL VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT IF YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED BY AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES AND HELD ON DEPOSIT BY CITIBANK, N.A., AS DEPOSITARY, OR IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD OF RECORD BY A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AND YOU WISH TO HAVE YOUR VOTES CAST AT THE MEETING, YOU MUST OBTAIN, COMPLETE AND TIMELY RETURN A PROXY CARD ISSUED IN YOUR NAME FROM THAT INTERMEDIARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED THEREWITH.


AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

PROXY STATEMENT FOR

20192022 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

   1 

COVID-19

1

Shares Outstanding and Voting Rights

2

PROPOSALS NOS. 1, 2, 3 AND 24 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   45 

Nomination of Directors

   45 

Nominees and Incumbent Directors

   56 

Directors Nominated for Election

   56 

Directors Continuing in Office

   67 

PROPOSAL NO. 35 ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   810 

Background

   810 

PROPOSAL NO. 46 APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

   911 

Fees for Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—E&Y

9

PROPOSAL NO. 5 RENEWAL OF THE POWER OF THE DIRECTORS TO ALLOT SHARESFirm

   11 

PROPOSAL NO. 6 APPROVAL7 ADOPTION OF SUBSEQUENT PRIVATE PLACEMENT PURSUANTAN AMENDMENT TOPRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT THE COMPANY’S 2020 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

   13

Proposal

13

Summary of Material Features of the Equity Incentive Plan

14 

ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

   1522 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   1623 

Director Independence

   1623 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

   1623 

Shareholder Communications

   1623 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES

   1724 

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

   1724 

Board Committees

   1725 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   1825 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   1927 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

   2129 

Transactions with Related Parties

   2129 

Related-Party Transaction Review and Approval

   2129 

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

   2230 

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

   2230 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   2331

Equity Compensation Plan Information

33 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   2534 

20182021 Operating Highlights

   2534 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

   2735

Chief Executive Officer Performance and Compensation

36 

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT

   4550 

Summary Compensation Table

   46

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

4751 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

   4955 

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

   5055 

Pension Benefits

   5258 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

   5258 

Employment, Change of Control and Severance Arrangements

   5258 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change ofin Control Termination

   5460 

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

   5561 

i


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

   5662 

Non-Employee Director Compensation

   5662

Director Compensation Table

63

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

64 

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

   5965 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

   6066 

DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS

   61

PROXY FORM

6267 

 

i

ii


PROXY STATEMENT FOR

20192022 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2019JUNE 27, 2022

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Amarin Corporation plc, a public limited company registered in England & Wales (“Amarin”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) for use at the Company’s 20192022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual General Meeting”) to be held at The Merrion Hotel, Upper Merrion Street,the Dublin offices of Arthur Cox LLP, Ten Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, D02 T380, Ireland on May 20, 2019June 27, 2022 at 2:3:00 p.m. local time for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, passing the resolutions specified in the Notice of Annual General Meeting. This Proxy Statement is being mailed to shareholders on or about April 25, 2019.May 24, 2022.

Please vote on the resolutions specified in the Notice of Annual General Meeting by appointing a proxy. A form of proxy for use by holders of ordinary shares at the Annual General Meeting is enclosed. Given the continued uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the possibility of new measures and restrictions being imposed in Ireland in the future, to ensure your vote is counted on the proposed resolutions, shareholders are strongly encouraged to appoint the Chairman of the meeting as your proxy through the process described in this Proxy Statement.

For a proxy to be effective, it must be properly executed and dated and lodged (together with a duly signed and dated power of attorney or other authority (if any) under which it is executed (or a notarially certified copy of such power of attorney or other authority)) at the offices of the Company’s registrars, Equiniti Limited of Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex, BN99 6DA, England (the “Registrars”) so as to be received by 14:3:00 p.m. local time on 16 May 2019.June 23, 2022. Each proxy properly tendered will, unless otherwise directed by the shareholder, be voted FOR the nominees described in this Proxy Statement and FOR each other proposal described in the Proxy Statement, and at the discretion of the proxy holder(s) with regard to all other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

The Company will pay all of the costs of soliciting proxies. We will provide copies of our proxy materials to Citibank, N.A. as the depositary for our American Depositary Shares (the “Depositary”), brokerage firms, fiduciaries and custodians for forwarding to beneficial owners and will reimburse these persons for their costs of forwarding these materials. We have engaged Okapi Partners to assist us in the distribution and solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000$25,000 plus expenses. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies; however, we will not pay them additional compensation for any of these services. Proxies may be solicited by telephone, facsimile, or personal solicitation.

COVID-19

As at the date of the Notice of Annual General Meeting, having regard to the current status of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the lifting of legal restrictions by the Irish Government, the Board intends for the Annual General Meeting to take place in person. However, given the continued uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the possibility of new measures and restrictions being imposed in the future, shareholders are strongly encouraged to appoint the Chairman of the meeting as your proxy through the process described in this Proxy Statement to ensure your vote is counted on the proposed resolutions.

If you plan to attend the Annual General Meeting in person, please notify the Company in advance by email to annual.general.meeting@amarincorp.com to assist the Company with planning and implementing arrangements for the Annual General Meeting. Please do not attend the Annual General Meeting in person if you have symptoms of or have tested positive for COVID-19. Any person attempting to attend the Annual General

Meeting in person and displaying COVID-19 symptoms may not be permitted to enter the meeting so as to ensure the health and wellbeing of all other attendees. The Board may also adopt other measures that it considers appropriate to address any health and safety concerns, as may the operators of the venue of the Annual General Meeting.

The situation with respect to COVID-19 continues to evolve, and we are actively monitoring the situation as part of our effort to maintain a healthy and safe environment at the Annual General Meeting. If the arrangements for our Annual General Meeting change materially, we will issue a further communication through a Form 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and on our website at http://investor.amarincorp.com.

Shares Outstanding and Voting Rights

Amarin is registered in England & Wales and therefore subject to the United Kingdom Companies Act 2006 (the “Companies Act”), which, together with the Articles of Association of the Company (the “Articles”), governs the processes for shareholder voting at Annual General Meetings. There are a number of differences between English and U.S. law in relation to voting. At the Annual General Meeting, a resolution put to the vote of the meeting shall be decided on a show of hands unless a poll is demanded (either before a show of hands on that resolution or immediately after the result of a show of hands on that resolution is declared) by (a) the chairman,Chairman of the meeting, (b) at least two shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting, (c) a shareholder or shareholders representing not less thanone-tenth of the total voting rights of all shareholders having the right to vote at the meeting (excluding any voting rights attached to shares that are held as treasury shares) or (d) a shareholder or shareholders holding shares conferring a right to vote at the meeting being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less thanone-tenth of the total sum paid up on all shares conferring that right (excluding any shares in the Company conferring a right to vote at the meeting that are held as treasury shares).

Only holders of record of our ordinary shares with a par value of £0.50 each (“Ordinary Shares”) at the close of business on April 11, 2019May 4, 2022 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of, and to attend and to vote at, the Annual General Meeting. On the Record Date, approximately 334,427,855404,680,751 Ordinary Shares were issued and 330,640,297397,008,153 were outstanding, of which approximately 330,433,208396,811,326 were held in the name of the Depositary, which issues Company-sponsored American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) evidencing American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) which, in turn, each represent one Ordinary Share. With respect to all matters to be voted on at

the Annual General Meeting, each shareholder present has only one vote unless demand is made for a vote on a poll (in which case each shareholder gets one vote per Ordinary Share held). The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least two shareholders who hold shares as of the Record Date will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual General Meeting. Consistent with the marketplace rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we will seek to ensure that the two shareholders present at the meeting in person or by proxy represent at least one-third of our outstanding shares of voting stock. At any adjournment of the Annual General Meeting, if a quorum is not present within 15 minutes from the time appointed for such meeting, one person entitled to be counted in a quorum present at the adjournment shall be a quorum.

Persons who hold Ordinary Shares directly on the Record Date (“record holders”) must return a proxy card or attend the Annual General Meeting in person in order to vote on the proposals.

Persons who own Ordinary Shares indirectlyhold ADSs through a bank, broker or nominee on the Record Date through a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution, including persons who own Ordinary Shares in the form ofwill receive documentation and instructions for voting such ADSs through the Depositary (“beneficial owners”) must return a voting instruction form to have their shares or the shares underlying their ADSs, as the case may be, voted on their behalf. Brokerage firms, banks or other financial institutions that do not receive voting instructions from beneficial owners may either return a proxy leaving these sharesun-voted (a “brokernon-vote”) or vote these shares on behalf of the beneficial owners. Your brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution may vote your shares on routine matters and cannot vote your shares on anynon-routine matter. The appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4) is a routine matter. We encourage you to provide voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution by giving your proxy to them. This ensures that your shares will be voted at the Annual General Meeting, accordingincluding the ADS proxy card, through such organization. The organization holding your account is considered the ADS holder of record. Please reach out to that organization to provide your voting instructions. You should receive directions from your brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution about how to submit your proxy to them at the time you receive this proxy statement.

ADRADS holders are not entitled to vote directly at the Annual General Meeting, but an Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of November 4, 2011 (the “Deposit Agreement”), exists between the Depositary and the holders of ADRsADSs pursuant to which registered holders of ADRsADSs as of the Record Date are entitled to instruct the Depositary as to the exercise of voting rights pertaining to the Ordinary Shares so represented. The Depositary has agreed that it will endeavor, insofar as practicable, to vote (in person (if permitted) or by delivery

to the Company of a proxy) the Ordinary Shares registered in the name of the Depositary, in accordance with the instructions of the ADRADS holders. In the event that the instruction card is executed but does not specify the manner in which the Ordinary Shares represented are to be voted (i.e., by marking a vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or any other option), the Depositary will vote in respect of each proposal as recommended by the Board which is described in the Notice of Annual General Meeting. Instructions from the ADRADS holders must be sent to the Depositary so that the instructions are received by no later than 10:00 a.m. New York time on May 13, 2019June 21, 2022 (the “Instruction Date”).

Persons who own Ordinary Shares indirectly on the Record Date through a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution, including persons who own Ordinary Shares in the form of ADSs through the Depositary (“beneficial owners”) must return a voting instruction form to have their shares or the shares underlying their ADSs, as the case may be, voted on their behalf. Under U.S. national securities exchange rules, if the beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions, your brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution is only allowed to vote your shares on routine matters, and cannot vote your shares on any non-routine matter. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution holding the shares for a beneficial owner votes on one proposal but does not vote on another proposal because, with respect to such other proposal, the brokerage firm, bank or financial institution does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner as to how to vote such shares. The appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 6) is the only routine matter being presented at the Annual General Meeting. For non-routine matters, brokers, or other nominees, do not have authority, discretionary or otherwise, to vote your shares unless they receive proper instructions to do so from you in a timely manner. We encourage you to provide voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution by giving your proxy to them as promptly as possible to ensure that your shares will be voted at the Annual General Meeting according to your instructions. You should receive directions from your brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution about how to submit your proxy to them at the time you receive this Proxy Statement.

The Company has retained the Registrars to hold and maintain its register of members. The Registrars will be engaged by the Company to send proxy forms to all registered members appearing on that register and to take delivery of completed proxy forms posted to it in accordance with the details above.

Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but will not be counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast on a given proposal. The required vote for each of the proposals expected to be acted upon at the Annual General Meeting is described below:

Ordinary Resolutions

Proposals No. 1, 2, 3 and No. 2—4—Election of directors. Each director nominated for election is elected if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of such director or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of such director. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

Proposal No. 3—5—Advisory(non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. This advisory proposal will be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

Proposal No. 46Approval of independent registered public accounting firm. This proposal will be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy

and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-voteswill have no effect on the vote outcome. Because brokers and other nominees can exercise their discretionary authority on this matter, there will not be any broker non-votes for this proposal.

Proposal No. 5 Renewal 7—Approval of an amendment to the power of the directors to allot sharesCompany’s 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.. This proposal willmust be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and votingentitled to vote on the proposal are voted in favor(whether voting is by show of the resolution.hands or a poll is taken). As a result, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal and brokernon-votes will will have no effect on the vote outcome.

Special Resolution

Proposal No. 6ApprovalTo ensure your vote is counted on the proposed resolutions, shareholders are strongly encouraged to appoint the Chairman of the disapplication ofpre-emptive rights to holders of ordinary shares. Approval ofmeeting as your proxy through the process described in this proposal requires (i) on a show of hands, the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the holders of shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal or (ii) on a poll, the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

We encourage you to vote by proxy by mailing an executed proxy card.Proxy Statement. By voting in advance of the meeting, this ensures that your shares will be voted and reduces the likelihood that the Company will be forced to incur additional expenses soliciting proxies for the Annual General Meeting. Any record holder of our Ordinary Shares may attend the Annual General Meeting in person and may revoke the enclosed form of proxy at any time by:

 

executing and delivering to the corporate secretary a later-dated proxy; or

 

voting in person at the Annual General Meeting.Meeting (subject to any restrictions on in-person attendance that may be imposed in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic - please refer to the “COVID-19”section above for further information on this).

Beneficial owners of our Ordinary Shares and ADSs representing our Ordinary Shares who wish to change or revoke their voting instructions should contact their brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution or the Depositary, as applicable, for information on how to do so. Generally, however, beneficial owners of our Ordinary Shares and ADSs representing our Ordinary Shares who wish to change or revoke their voting instructions may do so up until 10:00 a.m. New York time on the Instruction Date. To ensure your vote is counted on the proposed resolutions, shareholders are strongly encouraged to appoint the Chairman of the meeting as your proxy through the process described in this Proxy Statement. Beneficial owners who wish to attend the Annual General Meeting and vote in person should contact their brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution holding Ordinary Shares of Amarin on their behalf in order to obtain a “legal proxy” which will allow them to both attend the meeting and vote in person. Without a legal proxy, beneficial owners cannot vote in person at the Annual General Meeting because their brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution may have already voted or returned a brokernon-vote on their behalf. Record holders of ADRsADSs who wish to attend the Annual General Meeting and vote in person should contact the Depositary (and beneficial owners wishing to do the same should contact their brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution holding their ADSs) to cause their ADSs to be cancelled and the underlying shares to be withdrawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Deposit Agreement so as to be recognized by us as a record holder of our Ordinary Shares.

PROPOSALS NOS. 1, 2, 3 AND 24

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Articles provide that, at every annual general meeting, at leastone-third of the directors at the time shall retire from office (or, if the number of directors at the time is not a multiple of three, then the number nearest to but not exceedingone-third shall retire from office). The directors elected at the Annual General Meeting will hold office until their successors are elected and qualified, unless they resign or their seats become vacant due to death, removal or other cause in accordance with the Articles.

As described below, the Board has nominated Mr. van HeekMikhail, Mr. Wold-Olsen, Ms. Enright and Ms. PetersonMr. Zulueta forre-election at the Annual General Meeting. Each of the nominees has indicated his or her willingness to serve ifre-elected. Should any of the nominees become unavailable for election at the Annual General Meeting, the persons named on the enclosed proxy as proxy holders may vote all proxies given in response to this solicitation for the election of a substitute nominee chosen by the Board. As previously announced, David Stack and Joseph Zakrzewski will be retiring from our board of directors at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting.

Nomination of Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which acts as the Company’s nominating committee, reviews and recommends to the Board potential nominees for election to the Board. In reviewing potential nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the qualifications of each potential nominee in light of the Board’s existing and desired mix of experience and expertise. Specifically, as set forth in our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, it considers whether the nominee satisfies the following minimum criteria: has experience at a strategic or policymaking level in a business, government,non-profit or academic organization of high standing; is highly accomplished in his or her field, with superior credentials and recognition; is well regarded in the community and has a long-term reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards; has sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve; has a demonstrated history of actively contributing at board meetings (to the extent that the nominee serves or has previously served on other boards). In addition to these minimum qualifications, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends that the Board select persons for nomination to help ensure that: a majority of the Board shall be independent in accordance with in the listing standards of the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market (“NASDAQNasdaq”); each of the Company’s Audit, Remuneration and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees shall be comprised entirely of independent directors; and at least one member of the Audit Committee shall qualify as an audit committee financial expert as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider whether the nominee has direct experience in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology or healthcare industries or in the markets in which the Company operates and whether the nominee, if elected, would assist in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider whether nominees assist in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience, which is not only limited to race, gender or national origin, we have no formal policy regarding board diversity.

After reviewing the qualifications of potential Board candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee presents its recommendations to the Board, which selects the final director nominees. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board nominated Mr. van HeekMikhail, Mr. Wold-Olsen, Ms. Enright and Ms. PetersonMr. Zulueta forre-election as directors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers shareholder nominees using the same criteria set forth above. Shareholders who wish to present a potential nominee to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration for election at a future annual general meeting of shareholders must provide the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with notice of the nomination and certain information regarding the candidate within the time periods set forth below under the caption “Shareholder Proposals.”

Nominees and Incumbent Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and the Board has nominated, Mr. van HeekMikhail, Mr. Wold-Olsen, Ms. Enright and Ms. PetersonMr. Zulueta to bere-elected as directors at the Annual General Meeting. The table below sets forth the following information for these nominees and the Company’s continuing directors: the year each was first elected as a director of the Company, their respective ages and the positions currently held with the Company:

 

Nominee / Director Name and Year First Became a
Director

 

Age

  

Position(s) with the Company

Nominees for Director:

 

Karim Mikhail (2021)

51President, Chief Executive Officer, Director

Per Wold-Olsen (2022)

74Director

Erin Enright (2022)

60Director

Alfonso Zulueta (2022)

59Director

Directors Continuing in Office:

  

Jan van Heek (2010)

 69Director

Kristine Peterson (2010)

59Director

Directors Continuing in Office:

Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.D. (2008)

69Director

David Stack (2012)

68Director

Joseph S. Zakrzewski (2010)

5672  Director

Patrick J. O’Sullivan (2011)

 7780  Director

John F. Thero (2014)Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.D. (2008)

 5872  Director

Kristine Peterson (2010)

President, Chief Executive Officer, 62Director

Directors Nominated for Election

The following persons have been nominated by the Board to be elected as directors at the Annual General Meeting.

Karim Mikhail joined Amarin in July 2020 as senior vice president, commercial head Europe. He was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer, and appointed to the Board, effective August 2021. Prior to Amarin, Mr. Mikhail served as chief executive officer of Theodon, a global commercial strategy consultancy that he founded in 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Mikhail spent more than 20 years at Merck & Co. Inc., most recently as global commercial leader for Merck’s lipid franchise from 2014 to 2018. Prior to that role, Mr. Mikhail served as Merck’s chief marketing officer for Europe, Middle East and Africa and chief operating officer for emerging markets. Mr. Mikhail is a pharmacist by training and holds a master’s degree in biopharmaceutical marketing and management from the graduate school of business in Paris, École Supérieure de Commerce de Paris. Based on Mr. Mikhail’s executive experience in the biotechnology industry and his current role as our Chief Executive Officer, the Board believes Mr. Mikhail has the appropriate set of skills to serve as a member of our Board.

Per Wold-Olsen joined Amarin as a non-executive director in January 2022 and was appointed Chairman of our board of directors in May 2022. Mr. Wold-Olsen is currently the chairman of the boards of directors of GN Store Nord A/S and Oncopeptides AB, and chair of the advisory committee of Novo Holdings, where he previously served as a member of its board of directors. Mr. Wold-Olsen also previously served as chairman of the boards of directors of Lundbeck A/S and the Medicines for Malaria Ventures, and as a member of the board of directors of Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: GILD). Mr. Wold-Olsen’s experience includes a 30-year tenure at Merck & Co., Inc., where he served as President of the Human Health Intercontinental Division from 2005 to 2006, and prior to that, as President of Human Health Europe, Middle East/Africa and Worldwide Human Health Marketing from 1997 to 2005. Mr. Wold-Olsen is a former chair of the Europe Committee of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and previously served as a member of the board of directors of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. Mr. Wold-Olsen has dual MBAs in Management/Marketing from the University of Wisconsin and in Economics/Administration from the Norwegian School of Management. The Board believes Mr. Wold-Olsen has the appropriate skills to serve as a member of our Board based on his significant leadership and international business experience in the pharmaceutical industry.

Erin S. Enrightjoined Amarin as a non-executive director in May 2022. Ms. Enright currently serves as a Managing Member of Prettybrook Partners LLC, a family office dedicated to investing in healthcare companies. Prettybrook has approximately 20 active investments in a variety of companies, typically as a co-investor with institutional private equity. She is a member of the board of directors of Medical Facilities Corporation (TSX: DR), Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:BTX), Dynatronics Corporation (NASDAQ:DYNT) and Keystone Dental, Inc., a private company controlled by the private equity firm Accelmed. Previously, she served on the board of directors of Biolase, Inc. (NASDAQ: BIOL) during 2013, Tigerlabs, a Princeton-based business accelerator, from 2012 to 2018, and Ceelite Technologies, LLC, from 2010 to 2015. She was the President of Lee Medical, a medical device manufacturer based in Plainsboro, New Jersey, from 2004 to 2013. She was chief financial officer of InfuSystem, Inc. (NASDAQ:INFU) from 2005 to 2007. From 1993 to 2003, Ms. Enright was with Citigroup, where she was a Managing Director in its Equity Capital Markets group. While at Citigroup, Ms. Enright was Chairperson of the firm’s Institutional Investors Committee, responsible for screening and approving the firm’s participation in equity underwritings and a member of the Citigroup Global Equity Commitment Committee, responsible for reviewing and approving the firm’s underwritings. From 1989 until 1993, Ms. Enright was an attorney with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in the firm’s New York office. Ms. Enright received her A.B. degree from the School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and J.D. degree from the University of Chicago Law School. Our Board believes that Ms. Enright’s extensive experience in various capacities within our industry and her legal and executive background qualify her to serve as a member of our Board.

Alfonso Zulueta joined Amarin as a non-executive director in May 2022. Prior to Mr. Zulueta’s retirement in 2021, he spent over three decades at Eli Lilly and Company in various roles of increasing responsibility, including Vice President of Global Marketing, President of Global Oncology and Critical Care Products, and most recently as President, International Business Unit from 2017 until his retirement, where he was responsible for all geographies outside the United States and Canada. He was a corporate officer and member of Eli Lilly and Company’s executive committee. Mr. Zulueta currently serves on the board of directors of CTS Corp. (NYSE: CTS), Syneos Health, Inc. (NASDAQ: SYNH) as well as Glooko and Calidi Biotherapeutics, both privately held companies. He previously served as a member of the board of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, and US-Japan Business Council. He received his Bachelor of Arts from De La Salle University in the Philippines, and his MBA from Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia. We believe Mr. Zulueta’s experience over the course of three decades in global strategic and leadership roles within the healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board, especially given our international expansion plans.

Directors Continuing in Office

Jan van Heek joined Amarin as anon-executive director in February 2010. He is currently a Principalprincipal and Partnerpartner at BioPoint Group LLC, where he advises biotechnology and other healthcare companies in commercial strategy development, financing and business development. Prior to establishing BioPoint, Mr. van Heek spent more than 18 years at Genzyme Corporation, most recently as an Executive Vice Presidentexecutive vice president and Senior Advisorsenior advisor to the Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and senior management team. Mr. van Heek is currently a member of the board memberof directors of Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: NERV) and was a board member and Chairman of the Audit Committeeboard of directors of ViaCell, Corporation, a U.S. public company,Inc. from 2002 until it was sold to Perkin Elmer CorporationPerkinElmer, Inc. in 2007. He received an M.B.A. from St. Gallen University in Switzerland and an executive degree from Stanford Business School. Based on Mr. van Heek’s experience within the biotechnology industry and his executive experience, specifically his experience in executive officer positions at other companies in the biotechnology industry, as well as his service on other boards of directors, the Board believes Mr. van Heek has the appropriate set of skills to serve as a member of our Board.

Kristine PetersonPatrick J. O’Sullivan joined Amarin as anon-executive director in November 2010. Ms. PetersonDecember 2011. Mr. O’Sullivan has more than 3040 years of pharmaceutical industry experience, including 20more than 30 years at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, where sheas chief executive officer and member of the board of directors of the LEO Pharma companies in Ireland and more than 10 years as a member of the board of directors of the parent company of the LEO Pharma Group in Denmark. He was responsible for sales, marketing and general management inalso a varietymember of therapeutic areas, including leading the cardiovascular and metabolic diseaseboard of directors of Allergan plc from 2013 to 2018. Since 2007, Mr. O’Sullivan has been a business unit. From June 2009 to February 2016, she served as Chief Executive Officer at Valeritas, Inc., a medical technology company committed

consultant to the developmentpharmaceutical industry. Mr. O’Sullivan trained as a pharmacist. He earned a Bachelor of Commerce and commercialization of innovative drug delivery solutions, with its lead product for the treatment of diabetes. Prior to joining Valeritas, Ms. Peterson was Company Group Chair for the biotech business at Johnson & Johnsonan M.B.A. from May 2006 through June 2009, wasUniversity College in Dublin, Ireland. The Board believes that Mr. O’Sullivan’s experience from serving as an Executive Vice President at Johnson & Johnson from August 2004 through May 2006officer and was Senior Vice President of commercial operations at Biovail Corporation from May 2003 to August 2004. Ms. Peterson is currently a director of Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ImmunoGen, Inc., EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andvarious companies within the Greater Philadelphia Life Sciences Congress. Ms. Peterson has an M.B.A. in Marketing from the University of Illinois. Based on Ms. Peterson’s leadership experience in the pharmaceutical industry and her executive experience, specifically her experience as an executive officer at other commercial stage companies in the biotechnology industry, as well as her service on

other boards of directorshis educational training in the biotechnology industry andbusiness administration, make him a leading biotech industry trade organization, the Board believes Ms. Peterson has the appropriate set of skills to serve as avaluable member of our Board. Ms. Peterson’s contribution to the Company in the areas of commercialization and regulatory and political matters has been particularly helpful as the Company continues its current stage of development.

Directors Continuing in Office

Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.DPh.D.. joined Amarin as anon-executive director in November 2008 and was named Amarin’s lead independent director in October 2011 and Amarin’sthen served as Chairman of the Board effectiveAmarin’s board of directors from January 2014.2014 to May 2022. With more than 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry, Dr. Ekman is currently an executive partner at Sofinnova VenturesInvestments, chairman of the board of directors of Afyx Therapeutics (formerly Dermtreat), as well as chairman of the board of directors of Prothena Corporation plc (NASDAQ: PRTA). Dr. Ekman also serves on the board of directors of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (NASDAQ: RARE) and servespreviously served on the boards of directors of Spark Therapeutics, Inc. (from 2014 to 2019), InterMune, Inc. (from 2006 to 2013) and Ocera Therapeutics, Inc. (from 2009 to 2015), and as Chairmanchairman of the board of directors of Sophiris Bio Inc. (formerly Protox Therapeutics) as well as Chairman of Prothena Biosciences.(from 2010 to 2020). From October 2008 to 2011, heDr. Ekman served asCo-Founderco-founder and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of Cebix, Inc. HePrior to that, he was Executive Vice Presidentexecutive vice president and Presidentpresident of Global Research and Development at Elan Corporation plc from January 2001 to December 2007. Prior to joining Elan, heDr. Ekman was Executive Vice President,executive vice president, Research and Development at Schwarz Pharma AG from February 1997 to December 2000, and prior to that was employed in a variety of senior scientific and clinical functions at Pharmacia, now Pfizer. Dr. Ekman also sits on the board of directors of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. and Spark Therapeutics. Dr. Ekman is a board-certified surgeon with a Ph.D. in experimental biology and has held several clinical and academic positions in both the United States and Europe. He obtained his Ph.D. and M.D. from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Based on Dr. Ekman’s experience within the pharmaceutical industry and his executive experience, specifically his experience as Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and other executive positions in the biotechnology industry, as well as his service on boards of directors in the biotechnology industry, the Board believes Dr. Ekman has the appropriate set of skills to serve as a member of our Board.

David StackKristine Peterson joined Amarin as anon-executive director in December 2012. Mr. Stack is currentlyNovember 2010. Ms. Peterson has more than 30 years of pharmaceutical industry experience, including 20 years at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, where she was responsible for sales, marketing and general management in a variety of therapeutic areas, including leading the Presidentcardiovascular and Chief Executive Officermetabolic disease business unit. From June 2009 to February 2016, Ms. Peterson served as chief executive officer at Valeritas, Inc., a medical technology company committed to the development and commercialization of Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Stack was a managing directorinnovative drug delivery solutions, with its lead product for the treatment of MPM Capital from 2005 until 2017 and a managing partner of Stack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since 1998. From 2001 to 2004, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of The Medicines Company. Previously, Mr. Stack was President and General Manager at Innovex, Inc. He was Vice President, Business Development/Marketing at Immunomedics from 1993 until 1995.diabetes. Prior to that, hejoining Valeritas, Ms. Peterson was with Roche Laboratoriescompany group chair for the biotech sector at Johnson & Johnson from 1981 until 1993, in various positions including therapeutic world leader in infectious diseaseMay 2006 through June 2009, executive vice president at Johnson & Johnson for the pharmaceutical group’s global strategic marketing from August 2004 through May 2006, and director, business developmentpresident and planning, infectious disease, oncology, and virology. Hesenior vice president, commercial operations at Biovail Corporation from May 2003 to August 2004. Ms. Peterson currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chiasma, Inc. and Prognos AI. He was a member of the boards of directors of Molecular InsightImmunoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ: IMGN), Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2006(NASDAQ: PRTK), Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENTA) and Immunocore Holdings plc (NASDAQ: IMCR), and is also an advisory board member to 2010Philadelphia Life Sciences. She was previously a member of the boards of directors of EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: EYPT) and BioClinica, Inc. from 1999 to 2010. Mr. Stack holdsthe Biotechnology Innovation Organization. Ms. Peterson has a B.S. in Pharmacy from Albany College of Pharmacy and a B.S. in Biology from Siena College. The Board believes that Mr. Stack’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his extensive experience with pharmaceutical companies as an executive and director, his financial expertise and his years of experience providing strategic and financial advisory services to pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations in all stages of development.

Joseph S. Zakrzewski joined Amarin as anon-executive director in January 2010. From November 2010 to December 2013, Mr. Zakrzewski served as Amarin’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. From May 2007 to May 2010, Mr. Zakrzewski served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Xcellerex, a privately held company focusing on commercializing its proprietary next generation manufacturing technology for biotherapeutics, and from January 2005 to May 2007, Mr. Zakrzewski served as the Chief Operating Officer of Reliant Pharmaceuticals. From 1988 to 2004, Mr. Zakrzewski served in a variety of positions at Eli Lilly and Company including as Vice President, Corporate Business Development from 2003 through 2004. In addition, Mr. Zakrzewski served as a Venture Partner with Orbimed in 2010 and 2011. Mr. Zakrzewski is currently the Chairman of Onxeo and serves on the board of directors of Onxeo, Acceleron Pharma, and Sangamo Therapeutics as well as a number of privately held companies. Mr. Zakrzewski earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineeringmarketing and an M.S.M.B.A. from the University of Illinois. Based on Ms. Peterson’s leadership experience in Biochemical Engineering from Drexel University as well as an M.B.A. in Finance from Indiana University. The Board believes that Mr. Zakrzewski should serve on our Board

based on his knowledge of our Company gained from his former position as Chief Executive Officerthe pharmaceutical industry and his substantialher executive experience, servingspecifically her experience as an executive officer ofat other pharmaceuticalcommercial stage companies in the biotechnology industry, as well as Mr. Zakrzewski’sher service on other boards of directors in the biotechnology industry and a leading biotech industry trade organization, the Board believes Ms. Peterson has the appropriate set of skills to serve as a member of boards of directors of other pharmaceutical companies. Mr. Zakrzewski’sour Board. Ms. Peterson’s contribution to the Company in the areas of operationscommercialization and business developmentregulatory and political matters has been particularly helpful as the Company continues its current stage of development.

Patrick J. O’Sullivanjoined Amarin as anon-executive director in December 2011. Mr. O’Sullivan has more than 40 years of pharmaceutical industry experience, including more than 30 years as Chief Executive Officer and board memberlight of the LEO Pharma companies in Ireland and more than 10 years as a board member of the parent company of the LEO Pharma Group in Denmark. He was also a member of the board of directors of Allergan plc from 2013 to 2018. Since 2007, Mr. O’Sullivan has been a business consultant to the pharmaceutical industry. Mr. O’Sullivan trained as a pharmacist. He earned a Bachelor of Commerce and an M.B.A. from University College in Dublin. The Board believes that Mr. O’Sullivan’s experience from serving as an officer director of various companies within the pharmaceutical industry, as well as his educational training in business administration, make him a valuable member of our Board.approved expanded label for VASCEPA.

John F. Thero joined Amarin in November 2009. He was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer, and appointed to the Board, effective January 2014. Prior to his promotion, he was Amarin’s President since November 2010 before which he was Amarin’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Thero has more than 25 years of senior financial and operational management experience, including supporting the growth of life science companies for over 15 years. Prior to Amarin, Mr. Thero also served in a variety of roles and has helped manage both the successful commercial growth and the successful sale of companies between 1994 and 2007. Mr. Thero began his professional career at Arthur Andersen LLP, during which time he became a Certified Public Accountant. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Chiasma, Inc. He received a B.A. in Economics from the College of the Holy Cross. The Board believes that Mr. Thero’s experience in management positions at life sciences companies, as well as his experience as Amarin’s President and Chief Executive Officer and, before that, as Amarin’s President and Chief Financial Officer, provide him with the appropriate qualifications and skills to serve as a member of the Board.

Vote Required

Each nominee will be elected to the Board if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of such director or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of such director. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

Holders of proxies solicited by this Proxy Statement will vote the proxies received by them as directed on the proxy card or, if no direction is made, then FOR the election of all the nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

EACH OF THE NOMINEES IDENTIFIED ABOVE.

PROPOSAL NO. 35

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Background

As recommended by our shareholders at our 2017 annual general meeting and subsequently approved by our Board, we give our shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory(non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers,” each year (aso-called“say-on-pay” vote). At the 2018 annual general meeting, the Company’s shareholders supported thesay-on-pay vote with 96.2% of the votes cast in favor of the proposal.

Thesay-on-pay vote is anon-binding vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers,” as described in this Proxy Statement under the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure on pages 25 to 55 of this Proxy Statement. Our philosophy in setting compensation policies for executive officers has two fundamental objectives: (1) to attract and retain a highly skilled team of executives and (2) to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by rewarding short-term and long-term performance and tying compensation to increases in shareholder value. The Remuneration Committee believes that executive compensation should be directly linked both to continuous improvements in corporate performance(so-called “pay for performance”) and accomplishments that are expected to increase shareholder value. The “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section herein provides a more detailed discussion of the executive compensation program and compensation philosophy.

The vote under this Proposal No. 3 is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board or our Remuneration Committee. However, our Board, including our Remuneration Committee, values the opinions of our shareholders and, considers changes to our executive compensation program as appropriate in response to input from shareholders and evolving factors such as the business environment and competition for talent.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 3:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s ‘named executive officers,’ as disclosed in this Proxy Statement under the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the compensation tables and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables.”

Vote Required

This advisory proposalEach nominee will be approvedelected to the Board if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolutionsuch director or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution.such director. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 3.

PROPOSAL NO. 4

APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”)Holders of proxies solicited by this Proxy Statement will vote the proxies received by them as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, and has further directed that we submit the selection of E&Y for approval by our shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.

The Audit Committee reviews andpre-approves all audit andnon-audit services performed by its independent registered public accounting firm, as well as the fees charged for such services. All fees incurred in fiscal 2018 for services rendered by E&Y were approved in accordance with these policies. In its review ofnon-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible impact of the performance of such services on the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee has determined thatproxy card or, if no direction is made, then FOR thenon-audit services performed by E&Y election of all the nominees named in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 were compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence. Additional information concerning the Audit Committee and its activities can be found in the following sections of this Proxy Statement: “Board Committees” and “Report of the Audit Committee.”

E&Y commenced auditing our annual financial statements with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Representatives of E&Y are expected to be available telephonically at the Annual General Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate shareholder questions.

Fees for Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—E&Y

The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by E&Y for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Audit fees are for services relating to the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 as described in (1) below and allnon-audit fees are for services invoiced in 2018 and 2017.

   2018   2017 

Audit Fees(1):

  $1,663,527   $1,287,379 

Audit-Related Fees:

  $—     $—   

Tax Fees(2):

  $15,394   $5,924 

All Other Fees:

  $—     $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total All Fees:

  $1,678,921   $1,293,303 

(1)

Audit fees for 2018 include fees incurred in connection with the audit of our financial statements as of December 31, 2018, as prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), costs incurred in connection with the audit of statutory financial statements as of December 31, 2017, as prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and costs incurred in connection with registration statement filings.

(2)

Tax fees consist primarily of tax advisory fees and costs incurred for the preparation of tax returns and other related statutory filings.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 4:

RESOLVED, to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s auditors to hold office from the conclusion of this meeting until the conclusion of the next meeting at which the annual accounts are laid before the Company and to authorize the directors to agree upon the remuneration of the auditors.”

In the event that shareholders do not approve the foregoing resolution, we will need to engage a third-party auditor who will act as our independent registered public accounting firm under U.S. law and as our statutory auditor under UK law for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. We may proceed to engage such firm as our Board and Audit Committee deem advisable, which firm may include E&Y.

Vote Required

This proposal will be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.Statement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 4

EACH OF THE NOMINEES IDENTIFIED ABOVE.

PROPOSAL NO. 5

RENEWAL OF THE POWER OF THE DIRECTORS TO ALLOT SHARES

Under the Companies Act, the directors of a public company may exercise the power of the company to allot shares in the company or to grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares in the company if they are authorized to do so by the company’s articles of association or by resolution of the company. Any such authorization is only valid for a maximum period of five years. The grant of a general power of allotment by the Company’s shareholders is an additional step not generally required when companies domiciled in the United Sates are issuing securities.

This Proposal No. 5 seeks shareholder approval of a grant of authority to the Board to allot shares in the Company or grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares (the “Rights”) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000 (being the aggregate nominal amount of £125,000,000 in respect of ordinary shares and £23,000,000 in respect of preference shares), provided that such authority shall, unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company, expire on the fifth anniversary of the passing of the applicable resolution, except that the Company may, before such expiration, make an offer or agreement which would, or might, require shares to be allotted or Rights to be granted after the expiration of such period and the Board may allot relevant securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement notwithstanding that the authority conferred by this resolution has expired. This proposal is consistent with the authorization approved by our shareholders at a general meeting of the Company held on July 6, 2015 and includes the same level of limitation as the proposal that was previously approved.

The previously approved authorization, pursuant to which the Company currently may allot shares, will expire on July 6, 2020. The Board believes that it is important for the Company to retain the flexibility to allot equity securities on an accelerated basis should the Board determine it is necessary or advisable and in the best interests of shareholders, without incurring the costs or delays associated with calling a special meeting and preparing and circulating proxy materials to approve specific allotments of shares. The Board also believes that a large majority of public companies based in the United States do not require shareholder approval of each issuance and allotment of common equity. Without the approval of this Proposal No. 5, the Company may not be able to raise additional capital, in a timely manner or at all, if and as needed to fund its ongoing business and operations.

The Company has no present plans or proposals to effect share issues in a single transaction, or to a small number of persons resulting in one or more of such persons becoming a principal shareholder of the Company with the attendant ability to exercise significant influence over the Company’s affairs.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 5:

RESOLVED, to generally and unconditionally reauthorize the Board of Directors of the Company, in accordance with Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006, to exercise all powers of the Company to allot shares in the Company or grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares of the Company (“Rights”) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000 (being the aggregate nominal amount of £125,000,000 in respect of ordinary shares and £23,000,000 in respect of preference shares), provided that this authority shall, unless renewed, varied, or revoked by the Company, expire on the date five years from the date on which this resolution is passed, except that the Company may, before such expiration, make an offer or agreement which would, or might, require shares to be allotted or Rights to be granted after the expiration of such period and the Board may allot shares or grant Rights in pursuance of any such offer or agreement notwithstanding that the authority conferred by this resolution has expired.”

Vote Required

This proposal will be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present

at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 5

PROPOSAL NO. 6

DISAPPLICATION OFPRE-EMPTIVE RIGHTS TO HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES

Pre-emptive rights can be disapplied with respect to a specific allotment of securities by a special resolution of shareholders. Obtaining disapplication ofpre-emptive rights at the time of each individual proposed stock issuance is time-consuming and costly. To reduce such costs, minimize the delays associated with convening special meetings of shareholders, and provide the Company with sufficient flexibility in the issuance of equity securities on such terms and conditions as the Board considers to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Board is asking the Company’s shareholders to resolve, subject to Proposal No. 5 being passed and in accordance with Section 570 of the Companies Act, that the directors be generally empowered to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 560 of the Companies Act) pursuant to the authority conferred by Proposal No. 5, as if Section 561(1) of the Companies Act did not apply to any such allotment, provided that this power shall (1) be limited to the allotment of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000 (being the aggregate nominal amount of £125,000,000 in respect of ordinary shares and £23,000,000 in respect of preference shares) and (2) expire on the date being the fifth anniversary of the date of passing of this resolution (unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company prior to or on that date), except that the Company may, before such expiration, make an offer or agreement which would, or might, require equity securities to be allotted after such expiration and the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement notwithstanding that the authority conferred hereby has expired. The securities in respect of which the Board is seeking disapplication of shareholders’pre-emption rights are equity securities as defined in Section 560 of the Companies Act.

The Company has no present plans or proposals to effect share issues in a single transaction, or to a small number of persons resulting in one or more of such persons becoming a principal shareholder of the Company with the attendant ability to exercise significant influence over the Company’s affairs.

The Company currently may allot shares without such allotment being subject to statutorypre-emptive rights of its ordinary shareholders pursuant to an authorization approved by our shareholders at a general meeting of the Company held on 6 July 2015. This authorization expires on July 6, 2020. The Board believes that a large majority of public companies based in the United States do not have mandatorypre-emptive rights provisions with respect to their common equity. Without the approval of this Proposal No. 6, the Company may not be able to raise additional capital, in a timely manner or at all, if and as needed to fund its ongoing business and operations.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 6:

RESOLVED, to generally empower the Board, subject to the passing of Resolution No. 5 above and in accordance with Section 570 of the Companies Act 2006, to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 560 of the Companies Act) pursuant to the authority conferred upon them by Resolution No. 5, as if Section 561(1) of the Companies Act did not apply to any such allotment, provided that the power hereby conferred shall (a) be limited to the allotment of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000 (being the aggregate nominal amount of £125,000,000 in respect of ordinary shares and £23,000,000 in respect of preference shares); and (b) expire on the date five years from the date on which this resolution is passed (unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company prior to or on that date), except that the Company may, before such expiration, make an offer or agreement which would, or might, require equity securities to be allotted after the expiration of such period and the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement notwithstanding that the authority conferred by this resolution has expired.”

Vote Required

Approval of this proposal requiresEach nominee will be elected to the Board if (i) on a show of hands, the affirmative votea majority of at least 75% of the holders of sharesshareholders present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of such director or (ii) on a poll, the affirmative vote of at least 75%a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal.proposal are voted in favor of such director. As a result, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

Holders of proxies solicited by this Proxy Statement will vote the proxies received by them as directed on the proxy card or, if no direction is made, then FOR the election of all the nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

EACH OF THE NOMINEES IDENTIFIED ABOVE.

PROPOSAL NO. 5

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Background

As recommended by our shareholders at our 2017 annual general meeting and subsequently approved by our Board, we give our shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers,” each year (a so-calledsay-on-pay” vote). At the 2021 annual general meeting, the Company’s shareholders supported the say-on-pay vote with approximately 72.5% of the votes cast in favor of the proposal.

The say-on-pay vote is a non-binding vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers,” as described in this Proxy Statement under the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure on pages 34 to 49 of this Proxy Statement. Our philosophy in setting compensation policies for executive officers has two fundamental objectives: (1) to attract and retain a highly skilled team of executives and (2) to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by rewarding short-term and long-term performance and tying compensation to increases in shareholder value. The Remuneration Committee believes that executive compensation should be directly linked both to continuous improvements in corporate performance (so-calledpay for performance”) and accomplishments that are expected to increase shareholder value. The “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section herein provides a more detailed discussion of the executive compensation program and compensation philosophy, including how we align compensation elements with our annual goals and long-term business strategies and objectives, as well as review of incentive compensation, which is intentionally heavily weighted to equity compensation in an effort to align such compensation with investors, and review the Company’s performance against predefined goals.

The vote under this Proposal No. 5 is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board or our Remuneration Committee. However, our Board, including our Remuneration Committee, values the opinions of our shareholders and, considers changes to our executive compensation program as appropriate in response to input from shareholders and evolving factors such as the business environment and competition for talent.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 5:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s ‘named executive officers,’ as disclosed in this Proxy Statement under the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the compensation tables and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables.”

Vote Required

This advisory proposal will be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution. As a result, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 5.

PROPOSAL NO. 6

APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, and has further directed that we submit the selection of E&Y for approval by our shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.

The Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by its independent registered public accounting firm, as well as the fees charged for such services. All fees incurred in fiscal year 2020 for services rendered by E&Y were approved in accordance with these policies. In its review of non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible impact of the performance of such services on the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee has determined that the non-audit services performed by E&Y in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 were compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence. Additional information concerning the Audit Committee and its activities can be found in the following sections of this Proxy Statement: “Board Committees” and “Report of the Audit Committee.”

E&Y commenced auditing our annual financial statements with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Representatives of E&Y are expected to be available telephonically at the Annual General Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate shareholder questions.

Fees for Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by E&Y for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Audit fees are for services relating to the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 as described in (1) below and all non-audit fees are for services invoiced in 2021 and 2020.

   2021   2020 

Audit Fees(1):

  $1,595,277   $1,600,763 

Audit-Related Fees:

  $—     $—   

Tax Fees(2):

  $6,750   $22,833 

All Other Fees:

  $—     $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total All Fees:

  $1,602,027   $1,623,596 

(1)

Audit fees for 2021 include fees incurred in connection with the audit of our financial statements as of December 31, 2021, as prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), costs incurred in connection with the audit of statutory financial statements as of December 31, 2021, as prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and costs incurred in connection with registration statement filings.

(2)

Tax fees consist primarily of tax advisory fees and costs incurred for the preparation of tax returns and other related statutory filings.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 6:

RESOLVED, to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s auditors to hold office from the conclusion of this meeting until the conclusion of the next meeting at which the annual accounts are laid before the Company and to authorize the directors to agree upon the remuneration of the auditors.”

In the event that shareholders do not approve the foregoing resolution, we will need to engage a third-party auditor who will act as our independent registered public accounting firm under U.S. law and as our statutory auditor under

UK law for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. We may proceed to engage such firm as our Board and Audit Committee deem advisable, which firm may include E&Y.

Vote Required

This proposal will be approved if (i) on a show of hands, a majority of shareholders present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal vote in favor of the resolution or (ii) on a poll, a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal are voted in favor of the resolution. As a result, abstentions will have no effect on the vote outcome. Because brokers and other nominees can exercise their discretionary authority on this matter, there will not be any broker non-votes for this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 6

PROPOSAL NO. 7

ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S 2020 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Proposal

Our Board believes that share-based incentive awards can play an important role in the success of the Company by encouraging and enabling the employees, officers, non-employee members of our Board (the “directors”) and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depends for the successful conduct of its business to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company. Consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives, our Board believes that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company assures a closer identification of the interests of such individuals with those of the Company and its shareholders, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.

On May 14, 2022, our Board, based on input from Aon’s Human Capital Solutions practice, a division of Aon plc (“Aon”) (previously known as Radford) as independent external compensation consultants and the recommendation of our Remuneration Committee, adopted, subject to shareholder approval, an amendment (the “Plan Amendment”) to the Company’s 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan” and, as amended by the Plan Amendment, the “Amended Plan”) to increase the share reserve under the 2020 Plan by 10,000,000 Ordinary Shares or ADSs, as the case may be (“Shares”) and to increase the number of Shares that may be issued in the form of incentive stock options by 10,000,000 Shares. The 2020 Plan was originally adopted by our Board on March 16, 2020 and approved by our shareholders at our 2020 annual general meeting.

Say-on-Pay Results and Shareholder Outreach

At our 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, our non-binding advisory vote regarding the compensation of our named executive officers (our “say-on-pay”) received the support of 72.5% of the votes cast at the meeting. The Remuneration Committee has considered and will continue to consider the outcome of such say-on-pay votes when evaluating our compensation programs. We make a point of annually engaging with our shareholders to solicit feedback on our executive compensation program, regardless of our say-on-pay result. However, given this past year’s vote result, we felt it was particularly important to solicit feedback on our executive compensation program. Since the 2021 annual meeting, we met with institutional investors representing over 20% of outstanding shares and over 50% of our institutional investors. Representatives from the Company included our CEO, our CFO and our head of investor relations.

From these conversations, we heard many supportive comments about the direction of the Company, the structure of the compensation program as a whole, and for the increased emphasis in recent years on performance-based equity. Feedback from investors suggested that our shareholders appreciated that 2021 was a transitional year with unusual circumstances (e.g., the major transition of our senior management team, including the retirement of our CEO) but that the principles underlying our compensation philosophy and the components of our compensation for our ongoing executive team were aligned with shareholder values.

Based on the feedback received from this type of engagement, over the past several years we have relied more heavily on performance-based equity compensation, and may adjust our compensation arrangements based on future feedback. For example:

in 2017 and early 2018, executive officers of the Company were granted performance-based restricted stock units which were earned if the Company’s REDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes study was deemed to be successful and only if product revenue reaches pre-defined annual milestone levels ranging from $300 million to $500 million and then vest only if the recipient remains with the Company for an extended period of time following completion of the REDUCE-IT study;

in 2019, certain executive officers and other senior management of the Company were granted performance-based restricted stock units which are earned only if the Company’s aggregate revenue reaches a pre-defined annual milestone level of $1.0 billion;

in 2020, certain executive officers and other senior management of the Company were granted performance-based restricted stock units which are earned only if the Company’s aggregate revenue reaches pre-defined annual milestone levels of $1.25 billion (in which case 50% of the award will vest) or $1.50 billion (in which case 100% of the award will vest) while others in senior management were granted performance-based restricted stock units, prior to VAZKEPA approval in Europe and prior to securing market access in Europe, based on rapidly achieving net revenue levels in Europe of at least $125 million (in which case 50% of the award will vest) or $250 million (in which case 100% of the award will vest); and

in 2021, certain executive officers and other senior management of the Company were granted performance-based restricted stock units which are earned only:

with respect to U.S. centric employees, (x) if the Company’s U.S. net revenues in 2021 or any calendar year thereafter reaches $1 billion or (y) if the market share for icosapent ethyl exceeds 50% in 2022 or any calendar year thereafter or (z) if the Company achieves greater than $200 million in annual U.S. operating income in 2022 or any calendar year thereafter (the “U.S. Goals”);

with respect to European-centric employees, (x) as to 50% if the Company achieves at least $300 million in European net revenue in 2021 or any calendar year thereafter and (y) as to 50% if the Company achieves greater than $50 million in annual European operating income in 2021 or any calendar year thereafter (the “European Goals”); and

for global-sales centric employees, as to 25% of such award, upon the Company’s achievement of each U.S. Goal and/or the European Goal.

Alternatively, the awards granted in 2021 will become fully vested upon achievement of global net income of $300 million (excluding non-cash stock- based compensation charges) in 2021 or any calendar year thereafter. With respect to each milestone for the 2021 awards, achievement must occur with respect to financial performance during calendar years 2021—2027, in each case as certified by the Remuneration Committee with reference to the audited financial statements for such period included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We will continue to engage with shareholders and believe that our shareholders will continue to support our core compensation principles and our executive compensation program.

Summary of Material Features of the Amended Plan

The material features of the Amended Plan are:

The maximum number of Shares that can be issued under the Amended Plan shall not exceed the sum of (i) 30,000,000 Shares, and (ii) the Shares that remained available for grant under the Company’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2011 Plan”) as of July 13, 2020 (the “Plan Limit”);

The Amended Plan provides for the award of stock options (both incentive and non-qualified stock options), restricted stock units and certain limited unrestricted share awards;

The Amended Plan will continue to be administered by the Remuneration Committee;

Stock options may not be repriced in any manner without shareholder approval;

Shares subject to grants under the 2011 Plan and the Company’s 2002 Stock Option Plan that were outstanding as of the date of shareholder approval of the 2020 Plan but subsequently expire, are forfeited, surrendered, canceled or otherwise terminated in whole or in part, other than through exercise, may be made available for subsequent grants under the Amended Plan at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee;

Shares that are tendered or held back to cover the exercise price of an award or for taxes are not added to the reserved pool under the Amended Plan;

Any dividends and dividend equivalent rights payable with respect to any award under the Amended Plan are subject to the same vesting provisions as the underlying award;

The definition of “change of control” in the Amended Plan requires the consummation of a specified change of control transaction and is not a “liberal” change of control definition (i.e., our Board does not have the ability to exercise discretion with respect to what does and does not constitute a “change of control”);

Any material amendment to the Amended Plan is subject to approval by our shareholders; and

The term of the Amended Plan will expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of shareholder approval of the 2020 Plan.

Based solely on the closing price of our ADSs as reported by NASDAQ on May 23, 2022 and the maximum number of Shares that would have been available for awards as of such date under the Amended Plan, the maximum aggregate market value of the Shares that could potentially be issued under the Amended Plan is approximately $21.5 million, of which approximately $7.4 million represents Shares that were available for grant under the 2020 Plan as of such date and approximately $14.1 million represents the 10,000,000 new Shares which can be issued under the Plan Amendment. The Shares available for issuance under the Amended Plan will be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares acquired in the open market or otherwise.

Rationale for the Plan Amendment

The Plan Amendment is critical to our ongoing effort to build shareholder value. Equity incentive awards are an important component of our executive and non-executive employees’ compensation. Our Remuneration Committee and our Board believe that we must continue to offer a competitive equity compensation program in order to attract, retain and motivate the talented and qualified employees necessary for our continued growth and success in Ireland, the United States and internationally.

We manage our long-term shareholder dilution by limiting the number of equity incentive awards granted annually. The Remuneration Committee carefully monitors our annual net burn rate, total dilution and equity expense in order to maximize shareholder value by granting only the number of equity incentive awards that it believes is necessary and appropriate to attract, reward and retain our employees.

Our compensation philosophy reflects broad-based eligibility for equity incentive awards for high performing employees. As of March 31, 2022, 100% of our employees held outstanding equity awards in varying levels or were within a three-month provisional period to become eligible to receive equity awards. By ensuring that our employees hold equity awards, we link the interests of those employees with those of our shareholders and motivate our employees to act as owners of the business.

Burn Rate

The following table sets forth information regarding historical awards granted and earned for the 2019 through 2021 period, and the corresponding burn rate, which is defined as the number of shares subject to equity-based awards granted in a year divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for that year, for each of the last three fiscal years.

Based on input from Radford, the Remuneration Committee and the Board determined the size of reserved pool under the Amended Plan based on projected equity awards to anticipated new hires, projected annual equity awards to existing employees and an assessment of the magnitude of increase that our institutional investors and the firms that advise them would likely find acceptable. We anticipate that if our requested share reserve is approved by our shareholders, it will be sufficient to provide equity incentives to attract, retain, and motivate employees for the next one to two years.

Share Element

  2021  2020  2019 

Time- and Performance-Based Stock Options Granted(1)

   4,813,388   3,101,389   2,648,121 

Time- and Performance-Based Full-Value Awards Granted(2)

   7,724,500   3,459,527   1,472,965 

Adjusted Full-Value Awards Granted(3)

   11,586,750   5,189,291   2,209,448 

Total Awards Granted(4)

   16,400,138   8,290,680   4,857,569 

Weighted average common shares outstanding during the fiscal year

   395,992,009   381,759,067   342,538,086 

Annual Burn Rate

   4.14  2.17  1.42

Three Year Average Burn Rate(5)

    2.58 

Weighted average common shares outstanding during the fiscal year, including shares issuable upon conversion of preferred stock

   395,992,009   391,838,157   371,470,086 

Annual Burn Rate Including Shares Issuable Upon Conversion of Preferred Stock

   4.14  2.12  1.31

Three Year Average Burn Rate Including Shares Issuable Upon Conversion of Preferred Stock(5)

    2.52 

(1)

Includes zero performance-based stock options granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

(2)

Includes 2,008,800, 1,483,400, and 645,000 performance-based full-value awards granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

(3)

In accordance with corporate governance policy updates published by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), Adjusted Full-Value Awards Granted represents the total Time- and Performance-Based Full-Value Awards Granted subject to a multiplier based on our recent historic stock price volatility. Based on our recent historical stock price volatility and ISS metrics, we have utilized a full-value award multiplier of 1.5 for purposes of calculating the average burn rate for the last three fiscal years.

(4)

Total Awards Granted represents the sum of Stock Options Granted and Adjusted Full-Value Awards Granted.

(5)

As illustrated in the table above, our three-year average burn rate for the last three fiscal years was 2.52% based on weighted average common shares outstanding and 2.58% based on weighted average common shares outstanding including shares issuable upon conversion of preferred stock, which are both below the ISS industry category burn rate benchmark of 7.65% for Russell 3000 pharmaceuticals and biotechnology companies.

Summary of the Amended Plan

The following description of certain features of the Amended Plan is intended to be a summary only. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2020 Plan filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 14, 2020 and the Plan Amendment, which is attached hereto as Appendix A.

Eligibility. Eligible persons include any employee, officer, consultant or director providing services to the Company or any affiliate of the Company, as determined by the Remuneration Committee. As of May 23, 2022, approximately 602 individuals were eligible to participate in the 2020 Plan, which includes five executive officers, approximately 587 employees who are not executive officers, nine non-employee directors and one consultant.

Stock Options. The Amended Plan permits the granting of (1) options to purchase Shares intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and

(2) options that do not so qualify. Options granted under the Amended Plan will be non-qualified stock options if

they fail to qualify as incentive stock options or exceed the annual limit on incentive stock options. Incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of the Company and any subsidiary or parent (each as defined in Section 424 of the Code) of the Company. Non-qualified stock options may be granted to any persons eligible to receive awards under the Amended Plan. The option exercise price of each option is determined by the Remuneration Committee but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Shares on the date of grant. Fair market value for this purpose is the closing sale price of the Shares on Nasdaq on the date of grant. The exercise price of an option may not be reduced after the date of the option grant, other than to appropriately reflect changes in our capital structure. Incentive stock options cannot be granted in respect of more than 10,000,000 Shares.

The term of each option may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The Remuneration Committee will determine at what time or times each option may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments. In general, unless otherwise permitted by the Remuneration Committee, no option granted under the Amended Plan is transferable by the optionee other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and options may be exercised during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee, or by the optionee’s legal representative or guardian in the case of the optionee’s incapacity. The method of payment to be used to exercise an option is determined by the Remuneration Committee and may consist of, alone or in combination, (a) cash or check, (b) surrender (or attestation to the ownership following such procedures as the Company may prescribe) of other Shares that are not then subject to restrictions under any Company plan and have a fair market value on the date of surrender or attestation equal to the aggregate exercise price of Shares as to which such option shall be exercised or (c) delivery of a properly executed exercise notice together with such other documentation as the Remuneration Committee and the broker, if applicable, shall require to effect an exercise of the option and delivery to the Company of the sale or loan proceeds required to pay the aggregate exercise price and any applicable income or employment taxes. In addition, non-qualified stock options can be exercised for consideration in the form of cancelled indebtedness or by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of Shares issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a fair market value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price. The Remuneration Committee can also provide for the payment of such other consideration and method of payment permitted under applicable laws.

To qualify as incentive stock options, options must meet additional U.S. federal tax requirements, including a $100,000 limit on the value of shares subject to incentive stock options that first become exercisable by a participant in any one calendar year.

Restricted Stock Units. The Remuneration Committee may award restricted stock units to any eligible persons. Restricted stock units are payable in Shares or, at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, in cash or a combination of cash and Shares, and may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Remuneration Committee may determine. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance objectives and/or continued service with the Company through a specified vesting period.

Unrestricted Share Awards. The Remuneration Committee may also grant to directors Shares that are free from any restrictions under the Amended Plan, provided that the director shall pay an amount for the Shares at least equal to their aggregate nominal values. A director may elect to receive such an award of unrestricted Shares in lieu of cash meeting fees to which the director is otherwise entitled.

Dividend Equivalent Rights. During the vesting period for restricted stock units, restricted stock units may be credited with dividend equivalent rights, which entitle the participant to receive credits for dividends that would have been paid if the recipient had held the Shares underlying the restricted stock units that vest since the date of grant of those restricted stock units. Any such dividend equivalent rights shall provide that such rights be settled only upon settlement or payment of, or lapse of restrictions on, such restricted stock unit award, and that such dividend equivalent right shall expire or be forfeited or annulled under the same conditions as the restricted stock unit award.

Change of Control Provisions. The Amended Plan provides that upon the effectiveness of a “change of control” (as defined in the Amended Plan), except as otherwise provided by the Remuneration Committee in an award agreement, (i) participants may exercise their options to the extent vested immediately prior to the change of control within 12 months of the change of control (or through the expiration date, if earlier), (ii) all unvested awards held by directors (other than the Chief Executive Officer of the Company) will automatically vest in full and (iii) all unvested awards held by other participants (i.e., the Chief Executive Officer and participants who are not directors) shall continue to vest following a change of control and, if any such participant’s employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than “cause” (as defined in the Amended Plan) within two years of the change of control, shall fully vest, and in the case of options become exercisable and remain exercisable for a period of 12 months following such termination (or through the expiration date, if earlier). In addition, the Company may provide for awards to be substituted by equivalent awards or for a cash payment to be paid to participants in respect of all awards held by participants (whether or not vested) upon the change of control, in which case all original awards shall lapse upon the consummation of the change of control.

Adjustments for Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, Etc. The Amended Plan requires the Remuneration Committee to make appropriate adjustments to the number of Shares that are subject to the Amended Plan, to certain limits in the Amended Plan, and to any outstanding awards to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, extraordinary cash dividends and similar events.

Tax Withholding. Participants in the Amended Plan are responsible for the payment of any federal, state or local taxes that the Company is required by law to withhold upon the exercise of options or the receipt, vesting or settlement of other awards. The Remuneration Committee may require that tax withholding obligations be satisfied by withholding Shares that otherwise would be issued upon exercise, settlement or vesting or other Company shares. The Remuneration Committee may also require that the Company’s tax withholding obligation be satisfied, in whole or in part, by an arrangement whereby a certain number of Shares issued pursuant to any award are immediately sold and proceeds from such sale are remitted to the Company in an amount that would satisfy the withholding amount due.

Amendments and Termination. The Board may at any time amend or discontinue the Amended Plan and the Remuneration Committee may at any time amend or cancel any outstanding award for the purpose of satisfying changes in the law or for any other lawful purpose. However, no such action may adversely affect any rights under any outstanding award without the holder’s consent. To the extent required under the rules of Nasdaq, any amendments that materially change the terms of the Amended Plan will be subject to approval by our shareholders. Amendments shall also be subject to approval by our shareholders if and to the extent determined by the Remuneration Committee to be required by the Code to preserve the qualified status of incentive stock options.

Administration; Delegation. As noted above, the Amended Plan will continue to be administered by the Remuneration Committee, which has full power, subject to the provisions of the Amended Plan, to, among other things, select, from among the individuals eligible for awards, the individuals to whom awards will be granted, to make any combination of awards to participants, to determine the specific terms and conditions of each award, and to accelerate the vesting of one or more outstanding awards at such times and in such amounts as it determines. The Remuneration Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more directors or to a committee of one or more officers its authority under the Amended Plan with respect to the granting of awards to individuals who are not members of the delegated committee.

Compliance with Other Policies. Awards under the Amended Plan are subject to the Company’s insider trading policy and the Company’s clawback policy, as in effect from time to time.

Effective Date of Plan. The Board adopted the 2020 Plan on March 16, 2020, and it became effective on July 13, 2020, which was the day it was approved by shareholders. The effective date of the Plan Amendment proposed in this Proposal No. 7 will be the date the Plan Amendment is approved by shareholders. Awards of incentive stock options may be granted under the Amended Plan until March 16, 2030. No other awards may be granted under the Amended Plan after July 13, 2030.

New Plan Benefits

Because the grant of awards under the Amended Plan is within the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, the Company cannot determine the dollar value or number of Shares that will in the future be received by or allocated to any participant in the Amended Plan.

Grants Under the 2020 Plan

The following table provides information concerning the benefits that were received by the following persons and groups under the 2020 Plan: each named executive officer; all current executive officers, as a group; all current directors who are not executive officers, as a group; and all current employees who are not executive officers, as a group.

   Options   Stock
Awards
 
   Average
Exercise
Price
($)
   Number
of Awards
(#)
   Number of
Awards
(#)(2)
 

Named Executive Officers

      

Karim Mikhail

   4.05    1,127,500    1,808,500 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   4.42    421,950    478,650 

Michael W. Kalb

   4.48    325,200    550,300 

Aaron D. Berg

   4.42    421,950    478,650 

Jason M. Marks

   4.42    231,700    526,300 

John F. Thero

   5.03    775,000    1,064,300 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   5.03    193,500    230,700 

All current executive officers, as a group(1)

   4.26    2,528,300    3,842,400 

All current directors who are not executive officers, as a group(1)

   5.28    592,604    463,739 

All current employees who are not executive officers, as a group(1)

   4.84    2,546,894    9,176,750 

(1)

Represents the weighted-average exercise price for the group, and includes grants to employees who were still active employees as of May 4, 2022.

(2)

Includes performance-based restricted stock unit awards that vest and are earned only if pre-defined milestones are achieved.

Tax Aspects Under the Code

The following is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Amended Plan. It does not describe all U.S. federal tax consequences under the Amended Plan, nor does it describe non-U.S., state or local tax consequences.

Incentive Stock Options. No taxable income is generally realized by the optionee upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If Shares issued to an optionee pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option are sold or transferred after two years from the date of grant and after one year from the date of exercise, then (i) upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price (the amount paid for the shares) will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain, and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and (ii) the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The exercise of an incentive stock option will give rise to an item of tax preference that may result in alternative minimum tax liability for the optionee.

If Shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are disposed of prior to the expiration of the two-year and one-year holding periods described above (a “disqualifying disposition”), generally (i) the optionee will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of the Shares at exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on a sale of such Shares) over the exercise price thereof, and (ii) we will be entitled to deduct such amount. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the incentive option is paid by tendering Shares. If an incentive option is exercised at a time when it no longer qualifies for the tax treatment described above, the option is treated as a non-qualified option. Generally, an incentive stock option will not be eligible for the tax treatment described above if it is exercised more than three months following termination of employment (or one year in the case of termination of employment by reason of disability). In the case of termination of employment by reason of death, the three-month rule does not apply.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. No income is realized by the optionee at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted. Generally (i) at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the Shares on the date of exercise, and we receive a tax deduction for the same amount, and (ii) at disposition, appreciation or depreciation after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the Shares have been held. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option is paid by tendering Shares. Upon exercise, the optionee will also be subject to U.S. Social Security taxes on the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price of the option.

Other Awards. The Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with other awards under the Amended Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by the participant at the time the participant recognizes such income. Participants typically are subject to income tax and recognize such tax at the time that an award is exercised, vests or becomes non-forfeitable, unless the award provides for a further deferral.

Parachute Payments. The vesting of any portion of an option or other award that is accelerated due to the occurrence of a change of control may cause a portion of the payments with respect to such accelerated awards to be treated as “parachute payments” as defined in the Code. Any such parachute payments may be non-deductible to the Company, in whole or in part, and may subject the recipient to a non-deductible 20% federal excise tax on all or a portion of such payment (in addition to other taxes ordinarily payable).

Limitation on Deductions. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company’s deduction for certain awards under the Amended Plan are limited to the extent that any “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code) receives compensation in excess of $1 million a year.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2021 with respect to the Shares that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, consisting of the 2020 Plan, the 2011 Plan, and the Amarin Corporation plc 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) .

Plan category  Number of
securities

to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(a)
  Weighted
Average
exercise
price of
outstanding

options,
warrants
and rights
(b)
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plan
(excluding
securities
referenced in
column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

   27,770,479 (1)  $7.32 (2)   15,047,319 (3) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

   —     —     —   

Total

   27,770,479 (1)  $7.32 (2)   15,047,319 (3) 

(1)

Includes 18,493,303 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 9,277,176 shares issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units.

(2)

Represents the weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding under the 2020 Plan and the 2011 Plan. The weighted-average exercise price does not take into account restricted stock unit awards since such awards have no exercise price.

(3)

As of December 31, 2021, a total of 13,229,046 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2020 Plan and a total of 1,818,273 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the ESPP. No shares were available for grant under our 2011 Plan.

Shareholders will be asked at the Annual General Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 7:

RESOLVED, to approve the Plan Amendment to the Company’s 2020 Stock Incentive Plan.”

Vote Required

This proposal must be approved by a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote on the proposal (whether voting is by show of hands or a poll is taken). As a result, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote outcome.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 7

ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

As a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales, it is a statutory requirement that the Board lay before the Annual General Meeting the Company’s statutory accounts, which are the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, as prepared in conformity with GAAP (the “Annual Report”) and the accounts for the financial year ended December 31, 2018,2021, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting StandardsIFRS (the “Statutory Accounts”). As required by the Companies Act and the Articles, the Statutory Accounts will be madeare available for download in “PDF” format on the Company’s website (http://investor.amarincorp.com) as soon as they are complete, but no later than April 28, 2019, which is at leasttwenty-one clear days in advance of the Annual General Meeting.. In addition, hard copies of the Statutory Accounts may be obtained once they are complete, by contacting the Company’s investor relations department at Amarin Corporation plc, c/o Amarin Pharma, Inc., 1430 Route 206, Bedminster,440 US Highway 22, Bridgewater, NJ 0792108807 or by telephone at (908)719-1315. Shareholders of the Company will not be asked to take any action in respect of the Statutory Accounts at the Annual General Meeting but shareholders in attendance will have opportunity to ask questions relating to the Statutory Accounts.Meeting.

We know of no other matters to be submitted to a vote of shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the Annual General Meeting or any adjournment thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the shares they represent in accordance with their judgment. In order for any shareholder to nominate a candidate at a given annual general meeting, he or she must provide timely written notice to our corporate secretary pursuant to the terms of our Articles, as described below.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

We believe that the Company benefits from having a strong and independent Board. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company that would affect his or her exercise of independent judgment. On an annual basis, the Board reviews the independence of all directors under guidelines established by NASDAQNasdaq and in light of each director’s affiliations with the Company and members of management, as well as significant holdings of Company securities. This review considers all known relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination. Based on this review, the Board has made an affirmative determination that all directors, other than Mr. Thero,Mikhail, are independent. It was determined that Mr. Thero lacks independenceMikhail is not independent because of his status as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees. We believe that our Board and its committees, led by a group of strong and independent directors, provide the necessary leadership, wisdom and experience that the Company needs in making sound business decisions. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics helps clarify the operating standards and ethics that we expect of all of our officers, directors and employees in making and implementing those decisions. Waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the benefit of a director or an executive officer may only be granted by the Board or, if permitted, a committee of the Board, and will be publicly announced promptly in our SEC filings.Board. Waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the benefit of other employees may be made by our Compliance Officer, the Board or, if permitted, a committee of the Board. There have been no material modifications to, or waivers from, the provisions of such code. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the corporate governance section of our website (which is a subsection of the investor relations section of our website) at the following address: https://investor.amarincorp.com/corporate-governance. You may also request a printed copy of the code, without charge, by writing to us at Amarin Pharma, Inc., 440 Route 22, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, Attention: Investor Relations. In furthering our commitmentaddition, should any changes be made to these principles, we invite you to review our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and other corporate governance materials locatedwe intend to disclose within four business days on our website atwww.amarincorp.com.(or in any other medium required by law or Nasdaq): (a) the date and nature of any amendment to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and (b) the nature of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of our code of business conduct and ethical responsibility that is granted to one of these specified officers, the name of such person is granted the waiver, and the date of the waiver.

Shareholder Communications

Generally, shareholders who have questions or concerns regarding the Company should contact our Investor Relations department at (908)719-1315. However, any shareholders who wish to address questions regarding the business or affairs of the Company directly with the Board, or any individual director, should direct his or her questions in writing to the Lead Independent DirectorChairman of the Board, Amarin Corporation plc, 2 Pembroke House, Upper Pembroke Street28-32,77 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Block C, Grand Canal Docklands, Dublin 2, Ireland or c/o Amarin Pharma, Inc., 1430 Route 206, Bedminster, NJ 07921.440 US Highway 22, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807. Upon receipt of any such communications, the correspondence will be directed to the appropriate person, including individual directors.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES

During our 20182021 fiscal year, our Board met in person four times and met by teleconference one time.ten times. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of which he or she was a member in our last fiscal year. During fiscal year 2018, ourOur Board had anhas a standing Audit Committee, a Remuneration Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All members of the Audit, Remuneration and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees arenon-employee directors who are deemed independent.

AllIn light of the COVID-19 restrictions and protocols, the members of our Board who were directors atdid not attend the time attended the 20182021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders either in person or via telephone.and attendance at the 2022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders will likely be depending on COVID-19 conditions at the time. Although the Company has no formal policies regarding director attendance at annual general meetings, it generally encourages directors to attend annual general meetings and expects that all members of the Board will attend the 2019 Annual General Meeting.annual general meetings when conditions permit.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Dr. Lars Ekman isAs previously announced, on May 16, 2022, Mr. Wold-Olsen was appointed as our Chairman of the Board. Dr. EkmanMr. Wold-Olsen is independent and all key committees of the Board are comprised solely of, and chaired by, independent directors. The Board believes that this structure, combined with the Company’s established corporate governance guidelines, provides an effective leadership structure for the Company. In addition, to ensure effective independent oversight of the Company, the Board holds meetings of the independent directors of the Board at every meeting.

The Board has overall responsibility for the oversight of the Company’s risk management process, which is designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance and enhance shareholder value. Risk management includes not only understanding company-specific risks and the steps management implements to manage those risks, but also what level of risk is acceptable and appropriate for the Company. Management is responsible for establishing our business strategy, identifying and assessing the related risks and implementing appropriate risk management practices. The Board periodically reviews our business strategy and management’s assessment of the related risk, and discusses with management the appropriate level of risk for the Company. The Board also delegates oversight to Board committees to oversee selected elements of risk as set forth below.

As part of the Board’s risk oversight role, our Remuneration Committee reviews and evaluates the risks associated with our compensation programs. Our Remuneration Committee has reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to our employees and believes that our policies do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Amarin. In making this determination, our Remuneration Committee considered the following:

 

the Company’s use of different types of compensation vehicles to provide a balance of long and short-term incentives with fixed and variable components;

 

the granting of equity based awards with time-based vesting and performance-based vesting, both of which encourage participants to look to long-term appreciation in equity values;

 

the Company’s annual bonus determinations for each employee being tied to achievement of company goals, which goals promote long-term value; and

 

the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting and code of conduct and ethics, which among other things, reduce the likelihood of manipulation of the Company’s financial performance to enhance payments under any of its incentive plans.

Board Committees

Audit Committee.The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Ms. Enright (Chairwoman, effective upon her appointment to the Board in May 2022), Mr. van Heek (Chairman)(Chairman until the appointment of Ms. Enright as Chairwoman in May 2022), Mr. O’Sullivan and Ms. Peterson. The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting

processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in overseeing the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the external auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and external auditors and performs other duties, as set forth in the Audit Committee charter. The Audit Committee charter is available on our website atfurnished herewith as www.amarincorp.comAppendix B. The Audit Committee met by teleconference sevenfive times during our 20182021 fiscal year. All members of the Audit Committee satisfy the current independence standards promulgated by NASDAQNasdaq and the SEC, and the Board has determined that Ms. Enright and Mr. van Heek is each an “audit committee financial expert,” as the SEC has defined that term in Item 407 of RegulationS-K.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Currently, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of Mr. O’Sullivan (Chairman), Mr. Zakrzewski and Dr. Ekman. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also develops and implements policies and processes regarding corporate governance matters, assesses Board membership needs and acts as the Company’s nominating committee by reviewing potential director nominees and recommending nominees to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter is available on our website atfurnished herewith as www.amarincorp.comAppendix C. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met in person twofive times during our 20182021 fiscal year. All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfy the current NASDAQNasdaq independence standards.

Remuneration Committee.The Remuneration Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Wold-Olsen (Chairman, effective as of May 2022), Mr. Stack (Chairman)(Chairman until the appointment of Mr. Wold-Olsen in May 2022), Ms. Peterson and Mr. van Heek. The Remuneration Committee, together with the Board, determines the framework for the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and such other members of executive management as it is designated to consider. The Remuneration Committee also determines the corporate and individual performance goals under the Company’s management incentive plan and achievement of these goals, as well as reviews and reassess the Company’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive remuneration. Further, the Remuneration Committee oversees any major changes in employee benefit structures throughout the Company, reviews and authorizes the reimbursement of any claims for expenses of the Chief Executive Officer and chairmanChairman in excess of €10,000 and performs other duties as set forth in the Remuneration Committee charter. Additionally, the Remuneration Committee reviews and evaluates the risks associated with our compensation programs. The Remuneration Committee may delegate its authority to a subcommittee composed of one or more of its members. The Remuneration Committee charter is available on our website atfurnished herewith as www.amarincorp.comAppendix D. The Remuneration Committee met in person two times, met by teleconference one time, and acted by unanimous written consent twothree times during our 20182021 fiscal year. All members of the Remuneration Committee satisfy the current NASDAQNasdaq and SEC independence standards and qualify as “outside“non-employee directors” under Section 162(m) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the 2018 fiscal year, Mr. Stack (Chairman), Ms. Peterson and Mr. van Heek served as members of the Remuneration Committee. During the last completed fiscal year, no member of the Remuneration Committee was an officer or employee of Amarin and no member of the Remuneration committee has ever served as an officer of Amarin. None of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or board of directors serving the compensation function) of another entity where such entity’s executive officers served on our Remuneration Committee. Moreover, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee of the board of directors serving the compensation function) of another entity where such entity’s executive officers served on our Board or Remuneration Committee.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our current executive officers and their respective positions are set forth in the following table. Biographical information regarding each executive officer is set forth following the table.

Name

Age

Position

Executive Officers

John F. Thero

58President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

Joseph T. Kennedy

51Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives, Secretary

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

54President of Research and Development, Senior Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer

Michael W. Kalb

48Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

Aaron Berg

56Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

John F. Thero. Please refer to Proposals No. 1 and No. 2 “Election of Directors” for Mr. Thero’s biography.

Joseph T. Kennedyjoined Amarin in December 2011 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and was named Amarin’s Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer in February 2012. He was promoted to Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives in July 2015 and no longer serves as the company’s compliance officer for pharmaceutical industry matters as of August 2017. From March 2009 to December 2011, he was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., where he played a lead role negotiating the company’s strategic collaboration with Purdue Pharma, helped obtain U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval for the company’s lead product and had responsibility for all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. Mr. Kennedy represented large pharmaceutical companies, developing life science companies and venture capital firms in private law practice from January 2006 to March 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Kennedy served as Chief Corporate Counsel, then Vice President, Acting Chief Legal Officer with Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. His work at Eyetech included transitioning the company from private to public, legal matters related to the company’s development and commercialization collaboration with Pfizer Inc., public company and pharmaceutical industry compliance, and the sale of the company to OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. Previously, Mr. Kennedy served as Vice President and U.S. Counsel, Corporate Business Development, with Élan Corporation, plc where he helped acquire technologies, managed legal issues related to multiple collaborations and participated in the company’s sale of assets that raised over $2.0 billion in a restructuring. Mr. Kennedy was honored by the President of Ireland as one of the inaugural “Irish Life Science 50” which recognized Irish-Americans for contributions to the life science industry, byFinancial Times in its recognition of Amarin in 2016 as a standout legal innovator in its North American Most Innovative Lawyers awards and was named as one of the top general counsel in the industry in connection with his selection on theLegal500 GC Powerlist: United States 2019. He also serves as a member of the Business Advisory Board of Fountain Healthcare Partners, a life science venture capital fund.

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D., joined Amarin in February 2012 as Senior Vice President and President of Research and Development. He was named Chief Scientific Officer in January 2016. Dr. Ketchum has 20 years of experience in late-stage product development and clinical regulatory strategy. From 2008 to 2012, Dr. Ketchum served as Senior Vice President of Research and Development for Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. where he provided strategic direction for all facets of research and development, including clinical strategy and operations, regulatory affairs, and pharmaceutical development and has served on its board of directors since his departure. From 2005 to 2008, Dr. Ketchum served as Senior Vice President of Research and Development and Medical Affairs for Reliant Pharmaceuticals where he led development and support activities for Lovaza and other commercialized cardiovascular products. Prior to 2005, Dr. Ketchum was Senior Vice President of Operations and Regulatory Affairs at IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and also held positions of increasing

responsibility in regulatory affairs during his nearly eight-year tenure at ALZA Corporation, where he supported the development and commercialization of a number of products, including Concerta. Dr. Ketchum earned a Ph.D. in pharmacology from University College London and a B.S. in biological sciences from Stanford University.

Michael W. Kalb joined Amarin in June 2016 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kalb served as Group Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. from August 2014 to June 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Kalb was GVP, Interim CFO and CAO from November 2010 to August 2014 and GVP, Chief Financial Officer—U.S. and CAO from May 2010 to November 2010. Mr. Kalb joined Taro in June 2009 as VP, Chief Financial Officer—U.S. He has over 20 years of financial and accounting advisory experience. From June 2004 to June 2009, Mr. Kalb served as a Director in the Accounting and Financial Consulting Group of Huron Consulting Group Inc. His experience also includes over ten years at Ernst & Young, LLP within the Transaction Advisory Services Group and Audit and Assurance Services Group. Mr. Kalb received a B.S. in Accounting from the University at Albany, State University of New York. Mr. Kalb is a Certified Public Accountant.

Aaron Berg joined Amarin in November 2012 as Vice President, Marketing and Managed Care and has since served in roles of increasing responsibility, including as Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales from February 2014 until April 2018. Since April 2018, Mr. Berg has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer.Before joining Amarin, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer for Essentialis, Inc., a development stage pharmaceutical company, where he led the company’s work on triglyceride management. Prior to joining Essentialis, Mr. Berg served as Vice President of Marketing and Sales at Kos Pharmaceuticals, where he was instrumental in driving annual revenues approaching $1 billion until the acquisition of the company by Abbott Laboratories in December 2006. Mr. Berg began his pharmaceutical industry career as a sales representative with Bristol-Myers Squibb, followed by various commercial positions with Schering-Plough and GlaxoSmithKline. He obtained his B.S. in Business Management, Marketing from the University of Maryland.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Parties

Other than the compensation arrangements described below under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation,” we are not a party to any transactions between us and certain “related parties,” which are generally considered to be our directors and executive officers, nominees for director, holders of 5% or more of our outstanding Ordinary Shares and members of their immediate families.

Related-Party Transaction Review and Approval

Our Board has adopted policies and procedures for the review and approval of related-party transactions and has delegated to our Compliance Officer the authority to review and approve the material terms of any proposed related-party transactions.

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest should be promptly reported to the Compliance Officer. Our Compliance Officer may notify the Board or a committee thereof as deemed appropriate. Conflicts of interest may arise in the following situations: if an individual is simultaneously employed or engaged by Amarin and another business (particularly a client or business partner of Amarin); if an individual participates in any activity that enhances or supports a competitor’s position; if an individual or member of such person’s immediate family accepts a gift with the intent to improperly influence the normal business relationship between Amarin and its clients or business partners or gives to or accepts gifts from a competitor; if an individual or a member of such person’s immediate family holds a financial interest in another business (particularly a client or business partner of Amarin); and if an individual conducts business on behalf of Amarin with a business in which a family member of such individual is associated in any significant role.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a)Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the 2021 fiscal year, Mr. Stack (Chairman throughout 2021), Ms. Peterson and Mr. van Heek served as members of the Remuneration Committee. During the last completed fiscal year, no member of the Remuneration Committee was an officer or employee of Amarin and no member of the Remuneration Committee has ever served as an officer of Amarin. None of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or other committee of the board of directors serving the compensation function or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity where such entity’s executive officers served

on our Remuneration Committee. Moreover, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee of the board of directors serving the compensation function or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity where such entity’s executive officers served on our Board or Remuneration Committee.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our current executive officers and their respective positions are set forth in the following table. Biographical information regarding each executive officer is set forth following the table.

Name

Age

Position

Executive Officers

Karim Mikhail

51President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

57President of Research and Development, Senior Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer

Michael W. Kalb

51Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

Aaron D. Berg

59Executive Vice President, President-US

Jason Marks

46Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary

Karim Mikhail is also a member of our Board. Please refer to Proposals No. 1, 2, 3 and No. 4 “Election of Directors” for Mr. Mikhail’s biography.

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D., joined Amarin in February 2012 as Senior Vice President and President of Research and Development. He was named Chief Scientific Officer in January 2016. Dr. Ketchum has 25 years of experience in late-stage product development and clinical regulatory strategy. From 2008 to 2012, Dr. Ketchum served as senior vice president of research and development for Viracta Therapeutics, Inc., formerly known as Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (which subsequently merged with, and was renamed, Viracta Therapeutics, Inc. in February 2021) where he provided strategic direction for all facets of research and development, including clinical strategy and operations, regulatory affairs, and pharmaceutical development and where he continued to serve on its board of directors until February 2021. From 2005 to 2008, Dr. Ketchum served as senior vice president of research and development and medical affairs for Reliant Pharmaceuticals where he led development and support activities for Lovaza and other commercialized cardiovascular products. Prior to 2005, Dr. Ketchum was senior vice president of operations and regulatory affairs at IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and also held positions of increasing responsibility in regulatory affairs during his nearly eight-year tenure at ALZA Corporation, where he supported the development and commercialization of a number of products, including Concerta. Dr. Ketchum earned a Ph.D. in pharmacology from University College London and a B.S. in biological sciences from Stanford University.

Michael W. Kalb joined Amarin in June 2016 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kalb has over 20 years of financial and accounting advisory experience. Mr. Kalb served as group vice president, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer of Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. from August 2014 to June 2016. Prior to that, he was general vice president, interim chief financial officer and chief accounting officer from November 2010 to August 2014 and general vice president, chief financial officer—U.S. and chief accounting officer from May 2010 to November 2010. Mr. Kalb joined Taro in June 2009 as vice president, chief financial officer—U.S. Prior to Taro, from June 2004 to June 2009, Mr. Kalb served as a director in the Accounting and Financial Consulting Group of Huron Consulting Group Inc. His experience also includes over 10 years at Ernst & Young LLP within the Transaction Advisory Services Group and Audit and Assurance Services Group. Mr. Kalb received a B.S. in Accounting from the University at Albany, State University of New York. Mr. Kalb is a Certified Public Accountant.

Aaron D. Berg joined Amarin in November 2012 as Vice President, Marketing and Managed Care and has since served in roles of increasing responsibility, including as Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales from February 2014 until April 2018, as Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer from April 2018 through July 2021, and currently as Executive Vice President, President-US, a position he has held since August 2021.

Before joining Amarin, Mr. Berg served as president and chief executive officer of Essentialis, Inc., a development stage pharmaceutical company, where he led the company’s work on triglyceride management. Prior to joining Essentialis, Mr. Berg served as vice president of marketing and sales at Kos Pharmaceuticals, where he was instrumental in driving annual revenues approaching $1 billion until the acquisition of Kos by Abbott Laboratories in December 2006. Mr. Berg began his pharmaceutical industry career as a sales representative with Bristol-Myers Squibb, followed by various commercial positions with Schering-Plough and GlaxoSmithKline. He obtained his B.S. in Business Management, Marketing from the University of Maryland.

Jason Marks joined Amarin in August 2021 as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, and in April 2022, was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining Amarin, Mr. Marks served as the chief legal officer and head of corporate development at TerrAscend Corp. from August 2020 to August 2021. Prior to his role at TerrAscend, Mr. Marks was chief legal officer, general counsel & corporate secretary of InflaRx N.V., a NASDAQ-listed biotechnology company, from December 2018 until August 2020 and senior vice president, head of legal branded Rx (Salix) and global litigation & government investigations at Bausch Health, a multinational specialty pharmaceutical company. Mr. Marks has also held senior roles at Novartis’s Alcon division, including as head of legal for North America and at Stryker Corporation. Mr. Marks received a J.D. from the George Washington University School of Law and an A.B. in History from the University of Chicago.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Parties

Other than the compensation arrangements described below under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation,” we are not a party to any transactions between us and certain “related parties,” which are generally considered to be our directors and executive officers, nominees for director, holders of 5% or more of our outstanding Ordinary Shares and members of their immediate families.

Related-Party Transaction Review and Approval

Our Board has adopted policies and procedures for the review and approval of related-party transactions and has delegated to our Compliance Officer the authority to review and approve the material terms of any proposed related-party transactions.

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest should be promptly reported to the Compliance Officer. Our Compliance Officer may notify the Board or a committee thereof as deemed appropriate. Conflicts of interest may arise in the following situations: if an individual is simultaneously employed or engaged by Amarin and another business (particularly a client or business partner of Amarin); if an individual participates in any activity that enhances or supports a competitor’s position; if an individual or member of such person’s immediate family accepts a gift with the intent to improperly influence the normal business relationship between Amarin and its clients or business partners or gives to or accepts gifts from a competitor; if an individual or a member of such person’s immediate family holds a financial interest in another business (particularly a client or business partner of Amarin); and if an individual conducts business on behalf of Amarin with a business in which a family member of such individual is associated in any significant role.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors andgreater-than-10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all reports filed under Section 16(a). To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on the review of copies of the reports filed with the SEC, all such reports required to be filed by our executive officers, directors andgreater-than-10% shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 were timely filed, except for one inadvertently late filing on Form 4 for each of Joseph S. Zakrzewski, Jan G. van Heek, David M. Stack, Kristine Peterson, Patrick J. O’Sullivan and Lars Ekman.filed.

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

Amarin has an insider trading policy that applies to all officers, directors and employees and certain affiliated persons. Amarin’s insider trading policy prohibits sale of any Amarin securities that are not owned by such persons at the time of the sale, so called short sales. Those persons subject to Amarin’s insider trading policy may not pledge Amarin’s securities as collateral for a loan (or modify an existing pledge) unless the pledge has been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board. Amarin does not have a policy regarding the ability of employees and directors to enter into hedging transactions with respect to Amarin securities, and hedging transactions are generally permitted, subject to the insider trading policy described above.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Based on information available to us and filings with the SEC, the following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership (as defined by Rule13d-3 of the Exchange Act) of our outstanding Ordinary Shares for (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our “named executive officers,” as defined in Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis below, (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) persons known to us to beneficially hold more than 5% of our outstanding Ordinary Shares. Unless otherwise noted, the following information is presented as of March 31, 2019.2022.

Beneficial ownership and percentage ownership are determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and include voting or investment power with respect to our Ordinary Shares. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, Ordinary Shares issuable under stock options, warrants, or other convertible securities that are vested or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 20192022 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the options or warrant(s), or other convertible securities, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Unless otherwise indicated and subject to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each shareholder named in the following table possesses sole voting and investment power over their Ordinary Shares, except for those jointly owned with that person’s spouse. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address of each person listed on the table is c/o Amarin Pharma, Inc., 1430 Route 206, Bedminster, NJ 07921.440 US Highway 22, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807.

The percentage of shares beneficially owned is computed on the basis of 396,940,908 Ordinary Shares outstanding as of March 31, 2022.

 

  Shares Beneficially
Owned
 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Number(1)   Percent of
Class(2)
   Shares Beneficially Owned 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Number   Percent of Class 
        

Baker Bros. Advisors LP. (3)

   42,592,824    12.88 

Baker Bros. Advisors LP (1)

   21,169,805    5.33 

Sarissa Capital Management LP(2)

   24,000,000    6.05 

Current directors and named executive officers:

        

John F. Thero(4)

   6,294,601    1.88 

Karim Mikhail(3)

   212,809    * 

Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.D.(5)(4)

   136,016    *    47,170    * 

Kristine Peterson(6)

   165,968    * 

Erin Enright

   —      —   

Jan van Heek(7)(5)

   136,289    *    180,752    * 

Patrick J. O’Sullivan(8)(6)

   254,468    *    253,931    * 

Per Wold-Olsen(7)

   94,000    * 

Kristine Peterson(8)

   210,431    * 

David Stack(9)

   51,991    *    84,463    * 

Joseph S. Zakrzewski(10)

   1,089,057    *    406,978    * 

Joseph T. Kennedy(11)

   34,604    * 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.(12)

   664,720    * 

Michael W. Kalb(13)

   91,003    * 

Mark W. Salyer(14)

   209,086    * 

All current directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)(15)

   9,275,527    2.75 

Alfonso Zulueta

   —      —   

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.(11)

   686,819    * 

Michael W. Kalb(12)

   588,967    * 

Aaron D. Berg(13)

   797,686    * 

Jason Marks

   —      —   

John F. Thero(14)

   7,774,730    1.94 

Joseph T. Kennedy(15)

   613,708    * 

All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)(16)

   3,564,006    * 

 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent.

(1)

Represents Ordinary Shares, or Shares, held as of March 31, 2019, plus Shares that may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.

(2)

Based on 330,578,168 Ordinary Shares outstanding as of March 31, 2019. The percentage ownership and voting power for each person (or all directors and executive officers as a group) is calculated by assuming the exercise or conversion of all options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019 held by such person and thenon-exercise andnon-conversion of all outstanding options held by all other persons.

(3)

Based on information provided in aan Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13G filed by Baker Bros. Advisors LP, Baker Bros. Advisors (GP) LLC, Felix J. Baker and Julian C. Baker on February 13, 2019.14, 2022. Consists of (i) 5,474,310 Shares1,784,805 shares held by 667, L.P. and (ii) 37,118,514 Shares19,385,000 shares held by Baker Brothers Life Sciences, L.P. (collectively, or collectively with 667,

L.P., “Baker Funds”). The number of Shares reported herein excludes the Shares issuable upon conversion of Series A Preference Shares of the Company held by the Baker Funds. The Series A Preference Shares are only convertible to the extent that the holders thereof together with their affiliates would beneficially own, for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no more than 4.99% of the outstanding Ordinary Shares or ADS of the Company after conversion (“Series A Beneficial Ownership Limitation”). By written notice to the Company, Baker Funds may from time to time increase or decrease the Series A Beneficial Ownership Limitation applicable to each fund to any other percentage not in excess of 19.9%. Any such increase will not be effective until the 61st day after such notice is delivered to the Company. Baker Bros. Advisors LP is the investment advisor to the Baker

Funds and has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares held by the Baker Funds. Baker Bros. Advisors (GP) LLC is the sole general partner of Baker Bros. Advisors LP. The managing members of Baker Bros. Advisors (GP) LLC are Julian C. Baker and Felix J. Baker. Julian C. Baker and Felix J. Baker disclaim beneficial ownership of all shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest. Each of Julian C. Baker and Felix J. Baker holds 123,372 Ordinary Shares not reflected in the table. The address for each of these entities is 860 Washington Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10014.

(2)

Based on information provided in a Schedule 13D filed by Sarissa Capital Management LP and Alexander J. Denner on January 24, 2022. Sarissa Capital Management LP and the fund and other private investment vehicles for which Sarissa Capital Management LP acts as the investment advisor own the shares. Sarissa Capital Management LP has the authority to vote and to dispose of the shares. Alexander J. Denner is the Chief Investment Officer, and the ultimate general partner, of Baker Bros. Advisors LP. The managing membersSarissa Capital Management LP, and, by virtue of Baker Bros. Advisors (GP) LLC are Julian C. Baker and Felix J. Baker. Julian C. Baker and Felix J. Baker disclaimsuch positions, may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest.shares. The address for each of these entitiesSarissa Capital Management LP and Alexander J. Denner is 860 Washington Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10014.660 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(4)(3)

Includes 2,110,17131,031 Shares directly owned, and 4,184,430130,675 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022, and 51,103 Shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2022.

(5)(4)

Includes 136,01647,170 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(6)(5)

Includes 165,96814,168 Shares directly owned and 166,584 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(7)(6)

Includes 14,168 Shares directly owned and 122,121253,931 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(7)

Includes 94,000 Shares directly owned.

(8)

Includes 254,468210,431 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(9)

Includes 51,99140,000 Shares directly owned and 44,463 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(10)

Includes 84,547196,547 Shares directly owned and 1,004,510210,431 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(11)

Includes 31,260496,912 Shares directly owned and 3,344189,907 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(12)

Includes 354,492250,747 Shares directly owned and 310,228338,220 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(13)

Includes 20,551392,084 Shares directly owned and 70,452405,602 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019.2022.

(14)

Includes 209,0863,252,752 Shares directly owned per his final Form 4 filed on August 3, 2021 and 4,521,978 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable aswithin 60 days of the date of the termination of Mr. Salyer’s employment.March 31, 2022.

(15)

See notesIncludes 317,860 Shares directly owned per his final Form 4 through 13 above; also includes Aaron Berg, who is a current executive officer but not a named executive officer.filed on August 3, 2021 and 295,848 Shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2022.

(16)

Includes an aggregate of 1,515,489 Shares directly owned, 1,997,414 Share issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2022 and 51,103 Shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2022 held by our directors and executive officers as a group.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2021 with respect to the Ordinary Shares or ADSs, as the case may be, that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, consisting of the 2020 Plan, the 2011 Plan, and the ESPP.

Plan Category

  Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise  of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights Weighted-
Average
  Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights Number of
Securities
Remaining
  Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity

Compensation
Plans  (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in the
First Column)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

   27,770,479(1)  $7.32(2)   15,047,319(3) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

   —     —     —   

Total

   27,770,479(1)  $7.32(2)   15,047,319(3) 

(1)

Includes 18,493,303 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 9,277,176 shares issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units.

(2)

Represents the weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding under the 2020 Plan and the 2011 Plan. The weighted-average exercise price does not take into account restricted stock unit awards since such awards have no exercise price.

(3)

As of December 31, 2021, a total of 13,229,046 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2020 Plan and a total of 1,818,273 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the ESPP. No shares were available for grant under our 2011 Plan.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following compensation discussion and analysis (“CD&A”) describes the philosophy, objectives and structure of our fiscal year 20182021 executive compensation program. This section is intended to be read in conjunction with the tables that immediately follow, which provide further historical compensation information for our named executive officers, (“NEOs”), who for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, were:

 

John F. TheroKarim Mikhail

  President and Chief Executive Officer

Joseph T. Kennedy

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives, Secretary

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

  President of Research and Development, SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer

Michael W. Kalb

  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary

Mark W. Salyer*Aaron D. Berg

Executive Vice President and President, U.S.

Jason M. Marks

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary

John F. Thero

  Former Senior Vice President and Chief CommercialExecutive Officer (retired effective August 1, 2021)

Joseph T. Kennedy

*  Mr. Salyer’s employment with the Company commenced on September 11, 2017

Former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and terminated on April 18, 2018.

Strategic Initiatives, Corporate Secretary (retired effective August 1, 2021)

20182021 Operating Highlights

WeIn 2021, we made tremendoussignificant progress this year on multiple fronts,in laying the foundation to support our long-term growth strategy, and we did so despite the continued global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and headwinds resulting from the impact of generic availability of VASCEPA in the United States. Our achievements included strong and key addition to one management team, greater geographic reach for VASCEPA, including the achievementcommercial launch of various commercial, regulatory, clinical development and other milestones, highlightedVAZKEPA in Germany in September 2021 following approval by our announcementthe European Commission of positive results of theREDUCE-IT outcomes study marketing authorization application in the second halfEuropean Union in March 2021, as well as the submission of 2018market access and reimbursement dossiers in ten European countries. We also expanded operations, diversified our strong stock price performance.pipeline and launched our Go-To-Market strategy. As discussed more fully below, achievement of these objectives werewas considered by our Remuneration Committee in determining executive compensation for 2018.2021. Key operating highlights from the past year include the following:following global achievements and status of progress as of December 31, 2021:

United States

U.S. net product revenue was $577.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 amidst the ongoing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of additional generic icosapent ethyl market entrants

U.S. commercial operations remain positive supporting our investments to expand into Europe

The launch of the Go-To-Market strategy and progress across all three initiatives:

Expanding provider engagement

Enhanced awareness and use of VASCEPA with optimized sales force and expanded reach to approximately 150,000 healthcare providers

Continued evaluation of resources and encouraging pay-for-performance partnerships, such as BlinkRx, elements of Omnichannel and other initiatives

Focusing on managed care access

In December 2021, Amarin had approximately 40% of total commercial and Medicare Part D lives on a weighted average basis with VASCEPA as the exclusive IP product, and additional anticipated decisions could positively impact our exclusive coverage level in 2022 beyond 40%

Improved access for VASCEPA for 25% of all commercial lives

Optimizing fulfillment of VASCEPA prescriptions for cardiovascular (“CV”) risk reduction

Launched new VASCEPA campaign focused on prior myocardial infarction and stroke patients at a heightened risk of a subsequent event to generate immediate growth acceleration

Partnered with BlinkRx to support fulfillment process across the continuum of care, to ensure patients can start and remain on VASCEPA

Europe

 

  

REDUCE-IT Results: In the second halfReceived market approval of 2018, the Company presented and published results, which were positive, of theREDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes study of Vascepa® (icosapent ethyl) capsules. This study demonstrated, compared to placebo, a 25% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, with a number needed to treat of 21, including a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death. These results are the largest shown as anadd-on to statin therapy, by any therapy in any studied patient population. This important result, recognized by theNew England Journal of Medicine Journal Watch Cardiology 2018 as a top story, and includedVAZKEPA by the American College of CardiologyEuropean Commission and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products regulatory agency (“MHRA”) as one of its top clinical trials for 2018, positions Vascepathe first and only treatment to potentially help millions of patients. During 2018, the Company supported 40 scientific publicationsreduced CV risk in high-risk, statin-treated adult patients who have elevated triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL) and presentations.other risk characteristics

Revenue Growth and Gross Margin Improvement: The Company recognized a record level of total revenue of $229.2 million in 2018 mostly comprised of $228.4 million in net product revenue from sales of Vascepa in the United States. The net product revenue for 2018 represented an increase of $48.5 million over 2017. Gross margin on product revenues was 76% in 2018, versus 75% in 2017.

LOGO

 

Prescription Growth: The Company increased normalized prescriptions for Vascepa by 25%Submitted market access and 27%reimbursement dossiers in 2018 compared to 2017 based on data from Symphony Healthten European countries (namely Germany, UK, Italy, France, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and IQVIA, respectively, further increasing its market sharethe Netherlands) ahead of prescriptionomega-3 products in the United States.plan

 

Commercial Expansion:The Company began its transition from a U.S. sales presence with a relatively small specialty sales team reliant on aco-promotion partner promoting Vascepa based on biomarker data to a broader direct sales model with more sales representatives, more physician targetsClinical and promotion which includes reference to cardiovascular outcomes study results. Prior to learning results of theREDUCE-IT study, the Company had approximately 150 sales representativesHealth Technology Assessments processes and reimbursement discussions progressed in the United States. After recruitment, hiring and training, the Company increased to having approximately 400 sales representatives in the United States in January 2019.all targeted markets

 

Strengthened Balance Sheet:AsLaunched VAZKEPA in Germany despite resurging COVID-19 disruptions. Progressed commercial launch plans of December 31, 2018,VAZKEPA in up to six countries as expected, with preparations underway in several key markets

Actively negotiated partnerships to bring VAZKEPA to Central and Eastern European markets via marketing and distribution agreements with partners who have established infrastructure in such markets

International

Expects regulatory filings, approvals and potential launches of VASCEPA, via partners, in up to six new countries, including Australia, New Zealand, and certain Asia-Pacific markets in 2022

Received acceptances of VASCEPA for regulatory review in Australia and Israel, and have embarked on initiatives to engage a commercial partner to market/distribute VASCEPA in this region

The National Medical Products Administration (“NMPA”) accepted for review the new drug application for VASCEPA submitted by

Edding, Amarin’s partner in China

Expects final decisions from the Company had $249.2 million of cashNMPA in mainland China and cash equivalents with no outstanding term debt or convertible debt.

Superior Stock Price Performance.As depictedfrom the regulatory authority in Hong Kong in the graph below,second half of 2022

Expanded VASCEPA commercialization in several Middle Eastern countries, including Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar through partners

Continued execution of international expansion strategy that features plans to bring the CV reduction benefits of VASCEPA/VAZKEPA to approximately 20 additional countries over the three-year time period through December 31, 2018, cumulative total return for Amarin’s ADSs exceeded both the NASDAQ Composite Index and NASDAQ Biotechnology Index. In particular, the total return for Amarin’s ADSs well exceeded the cumulative returns for the NASDAQ Composite Index and NASDAQ Biotechnology Index in eachcourse of the pastnext three calendar years.years through a series of distribution agreements and partnerships

 

LOGOAmarin’s partner in Canada, HLS Therapeutics, announced a co-promotional agreement for VASCEPA with Pfizer in Canada

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Pay for Performance

Our philosophy in setting compensation policies for executive officers has two fundamental objectives: (1) to attract and retain a highly skilled team of executives and (2) to align our executives’ interests with those of our

shareholders by rewarding short-term and long-term performance and tying compensation to increases in shareholder value. The Remuneration Committee believes that executive compensation should be directly linked both to continuous improvements in corporate performance (“pay for performance”) and accomplishments that are expected to increase shareholder value. In furtherance of this goal, the Remuneration Committee has adhered to the following guidelines as a foundation for decisions that affect the levels of compensation:

 

provide a competitive total compensation package that enables the Company to attract and retain highly qualified executives with the skills and experience required for the achievement of business goals;

 

align compensation elements with the Company’s annual goals and long-term business strategies and objectives;

 

promote the achievement of key strategic and financial performance measures by linking short-term and long-term cash and equity incentives to the achievement of measurable corporate and individual performance goals; and

 

align executives’ incentives with the creation of shareholder value.

The Remuneration Committee has historically compensated executive officers with three primary compensation components: base salary, annual and short-term incentive bonuses, and long-term equity-based compensation. The Remuneration Committee believes that cash compensation in the form of base salary and incentive bonuses provides our executives with short-term rewards for success in operations, and that long-term compensation through the grant of equity awards aligns the objectives of management with those of our shareholders with respect to our long-term performance and success.

As part of establishing competitive compensation and evaluating performance, the Remuneration Committee takes into account the Company’s plans and the Company’s performance against such plans as well as the Company’s performance with respect to unforeseen opportunities and challenges such as the prolonged impact in 2021 of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chief Executive Officer Performance and Compensation

Our Remuneration Committee believes that it is especially important to set compensation for our Chief Executive Officer in a manner that address the two fundamental objectives described above.

John F. Thero has served as our The compensation discussion below pertains to the 2021 compensation of Karim Mikhail, who succeeded to the role of President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2014. Before that, he servedon August 1, 2021, upon the retirement of John F. Thero. Prior to his appointment as our President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2010 and before that as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2009. Mr. Thero has over 25 years of executive level experience and, in the view of the Remuneration Committee, a strong record of accomplishment before and during his tenure at the Company.

Mr. Thero became Chief Executive Officer in 2014 to stabilize and grow the Company following significant corporate setbacks emanating from a change in position by the FDA regarding requirements for approval of the ANCHOR indication as became evident in an FDA advisory committee meeting in late 2013, which meeting concluded with a vote against a significant proposed label expansion for Vascepa followed by the FDA rescinding the related ANCHOR study special protocol assessment agreement. Since becoming President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Thero has played a critical role in selecting, retaining and motivating experienced personnel throughout the Company, repositioning the Company’s commercial strategy and tactics resulting in significant product revenue growth, expanding managed care coverage for Vascepa, entering into multiple strategic transactions, ensuring that theREDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes study was successfully completed, pursuing and achieving multiple remedies through favorable court decisions and achieving the 2018 operating highlights described above.Mikhail had been our Senior Vice President, Commercial Head Europe since July 2020.

Throughout his tenure as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Thero’sMikhail’s cash compensation has been at or below the 50th percentile of the Company’s peer groupwas set by the Remuneration Committee with greater emphasis on Mr. Thero’s compensation in the form of equity incentive awards. Effective February 2018, Mr. Thero’s base compensation was adjusted to $664,800 per year, which was at the 50thmarket 25th percentile of other Chief Executive Officers in our 2021 peer group.

Mr. Thero’sMikhail’s bonus potential is tied to achievement ofpre-defined corporate goals for the applicable year, with no consideration given to individual performance goals as his individual goals were deemed to be the corporate goals. For 2018,2021, Mr. Thero’sMikhail’s target cash bonus potential, which was 75%70% of his base compensation and slightly belowat approximately the 50th25th percentile for other Chief Executive Officers in our peer group, was tied to achievement of meaningful and challengingthe corporate goals established atby the start ofRemuneration Committee.

The Remuneration Committee established Mr. Mikhail’s compensation on the year.

belief his experience, leadership and abilities would be critical to the Company’s efforts to overcome challenges and to focus on Amarin’s long-term growth strategy. The Remuneration Committee believes that Mr. Thero’s cashMikhail’s total compensation ishas been strongly aligned with corporate performance and the interests of our shareholders. Ourshareholders, including consideration of base compensation, target cash bonus potential and equity incentive awards. With regard to incentive cash bonuses, our Remuneration Committee has an established practice of paying no or partial incentive cash bonuses when thepre-defined corporate goals are not achieved or achieved only in part. For example, for 2013,2021, Mr. TheroMikhail was awarded no cashan annual bonus followingfor 2021 in the failureamount of $430,000 based on 83% achievement of the FDA to approve the ANCHOR indication, a key corporate goal for that year, and in 2015 and 2014, Mr. Thero was awarded 98% and 75% of his bonus target, respectively, based on only partial achievement of thepre-defined corporate goals for those years. Conversely, whenpre-defined corporate goals are achieved in whole, or whenpre-defined “stretch” goals are achieved, incentive cash bonuses are paid commensurate with the level of achievement in that year. For example, in 2017 and 2016, both years in which corporate achievement was especially strong, including the achievement ofpre-defined corporate goals andpre-defined stretch goals, Mr. Thero was awarded 117% and 122% of his bonus target, respectively. In 2018, Mr. Thero was awarded 95% of his bonus target based on substantial achievement of thepre-defined corporate goals and an additional 50% of his bonus target based on the achievement of onepre-defined stretch goal pertaining to the results of theREDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes study exceeding expectations.goals.

Moreover,

Intentionally, a substantial portion of Mr. Thero’sMikhail’s compensation is in the form of equity incentive awards, which the Remuneration Committee believes further aligns Mr. Thero’sMikhail’s interests with those of our shareholders. The equity incentive awards are made in the form of stock options and restricted stock units, all subject to vesting requirements, that target the 50th of the Company’s peer group. These equity incentive awards are subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting criteria.

Time-based stock options generally vest over a four-year period. Performance-based stock options generally vest only if certainpre-defined performance criteria are achieved (e.g., commercial, clinical or regulatory milestones), plus an additional time-based vesting schedule if and only if those performance milestones are achieved. The stock options realize value only if our stock price increases after the date of grant. Time-based restricted stock units generally vest over a three- or four-year period. Performance-based restricted stock units generally vest only if certainpre-defined performance criteria are achieved (e.g., commercial, clinical or regulatory milestones). Certain of the performance-based restricted stock units also include an additional time-based vesting schedule if and only if those performance milestones are achieved. The restricted stock units realize more value the better our stock price performs.

As noted in the graph below, approximately 82%Approximately 80% of Mr. Thero’s 2018Mikhail’s 2021 total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table below including the value of the performance-based restricted stock units referred to in footnote 2 of such table, relates to stock options and restricted stock units and 91%87% of his total target compensation is performance-based andand/or at risk, in either the form of equity awards or incentive bonus:

LOGObonus.

In lightconnection with his promotion to the roles of the Company’s performance since Mr. Thero becamePresident and Chief Executive Officer, in January 2014,April 2021, Mr. Mikhail was granted a one-time (a) stock option award exercisable for up to 290,200 ordinary shares of Amarin, which vests in equal annual installments over four years, (b) award of 215,200 time-based restricted stock units relating to ordinary shares of Amarin, which vests in equal annual installments over three years and (c) award of 200,000 performance-based restricted stock units relating to ordinary shares of Amarin, which vests upon the Company’s stock price performance during his tenureachievement of certain performance-based milestones, as Chief Executive Officer, including eachdiscussed in more detail in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of the past one, two and three year periods and his compensation during that same time periods, thePlan-Based Awards table below.

The Remuneration Committee believes that the amount and nature of Mr. Thero’sMikhail’s compensation in 2018 are2021 were at levels that strongly aligned with Mr. Mikhail’s level of experience, Amarin’s corporate performance and goals and the interests of our shareholders.

Roles in Determining Compensation

Remuneration Committee

The Remuneration Committee, together with the Board, determines the framework for the compensation of the Company’sAmarin’s executive officers. The Remuneration Committee also determines the corporate and individual performance goals under the Company’sour management incentive plan and the level of achievement of these goals, and determines the policy for and scope of service agreements for the executive officers and contractual severance payments. While the Remuneration Committee draws on a number of resources, including input from the Chief Executive Officer and independent compensation consultants, to make decisions regarding the Company’sour executive compensation program, ultimate decision-making authority rests with the Remuneration Committee, subject in key cases to ratification by the independent members of the Board. The Remuneration Committee relies upon the judgment of its members in making compensation decisions, after reviewing the performance of the Company and evaluating an executive’s performance during the year against established goals, operational performance, and business responsibilities. In addition, the Remuneration Committee incorporates judgment in the assessment process to respond to and adjust for the evolving business environment.

Risks Related to Compensation Policies and Practices

As part of the Board’s risk oversight role, our Remuneration Committee reviews and evaluates the risks associated with our compensation programs. Our Remuneration Committee has reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to our employees and believes that our policies do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Amarin. In making this determination, our Remuneration Committee considered the following:

 

the Company’s use of different types of compensation vehicles to provide a balance of long- and short-term incentives with fixed and variable components;

 

the granting of equity-based awards with time-based vesting and performance-based vesting, both of which encourage participants to work towards long-term appreciation in equity values;

 

the Company’s annual bonus determinations for each employee and vesting of performance-based equity awards being tied to achievement of Company goals, which goals promote long-term value; and

the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting and codeCode of conductBusiness Conduct and ethics,Ethics, which among other things, reduce the likelihood of manipulation of the Company’s financial performance to enhance payments under any of its incentive plans.

Compensation Consultant

The Remuneration Committee retains the services of Radford, an Aon company, as independent external compensation consultants.Aon. The mandate of the consultants includes assisting the Remuneration Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices, including the competitiveness of pay levels, executive compensation design, and benchmarking with the Company’s peers in the industry. The Remuneration Committee regularly evaluates the performance of its compensation consultants, considers alternative compensation consultants, and has the final authority to engage and terminate such services.

The Remuneration Committee has assessed the independence of RadfordAon pursuant to Nasdaq and SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent RadfordAon from serving as an independent consultant to the Remuneration Committee.

Chief Executive Officer

Our Chief Executive Officer attends Remuneration Committee meetings and works with the Remuneration Committee Chairman and its compensation consultants to develop compensation recommendations for executive officers (excluding the Chief Executive Officer) and other key executives, based upon individual experience and breadth of knowledge, internal considerations, individual performance during the fiscal year, and other factors deemed relevant by the Remuneration Committee. The recommendations are then submitted to the Remuneration Committee for review and consideration. The Remuneration Committee works directly with its compensation consultants to determine compensation actions for the Chief Executive Officer. In accordance with NASDAQNasdaq listing rules, our Chief Executive Officer is not present during voting or deliberations concerning his own compensation.

Say-on-Pay

Annually, at our general meeting of shareholders, we hold anon-binding advisory vote regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, which we refer to assay-on-pay. The Remuneration Committee has considered and will continue to consider the outcome of suchsay-on-pay votes, including the percentage of votes cast in favor and against thesay-on-pay proposal, when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers. The Remuneration Committee believes that the most relevant period of time to assess

the performance of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer is the period over which he has held this position, which commenced in January 2014, during which period of time the Company’s stock price significantly outperformed both its peer group and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index as a whole. The Remuneration Committee also relies on advice from its compensation consultants, its evaluation of Company performance againstpre-defined corporate goals, its understanding of the challenges facing the Company and its observations of executive officer performance to determine executive officer compensation.

At our last annual general meeting2021 Annual General Meeting of shareholders in May 2018,Shareholders, thenon-binding advisory vote of shareholders supported the compensation of our named executive officers as reported in our 20182021 proxy statement by 96.2%72.5% of the votes cast at the meeting. These votes for and against thesay-on-pay proposal, together with available feedback from investors, have been and will continue to be considered by the Remuneration Committee in connection with the evaluation of executive compensation.

Shareholder Outreach Program

We make a point of annually engaging with our shareholders to solicit feedback on our executive compensation program. From time to time, we meet with our institutional shareholders to obtain their feedback and views on matters relating to our Company, including our executive compensation program. Based on the feedback received from this type of engagement, we relied more heavily on performance-based equity compensation in the past couple of years and may adjust our compensation arrangement based on future feedback. For example, in 2017 and early 2018, executive officers of the company were granted performance-based restricted stock units which are earned only if the Company’sREDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes study was deemed to be successful and only if product revenue reachespre-defined annual milestone levels ranging from $300 million to $500 million and then vest only if the recipient remains with the Company for an extended period of time following completion of theREDUCE-IT study, subject to acceleration in the event of a change in control transaction. We will continue to engage with shareholders and believe that our shareholders will continue to support our core compensation principles and our executive compensation program.

Competitive Market Benchmarking

The Remuneration Committee draws on a number of resources to assist in the evaluation of the various components of the Company’s executive compensation program. While we do not establish compensation levels based solely on benchmarking, pay practices at other companies are a factor that the Remuneration Committee considers in assessing the reasonableness of compensation and ensuring that our compensation practices are competitive in the marketplace.

Our peer companies usedreferenced in determining compensation actions with respect to 20182021 fiscal year compensation were selected by the Remuneration Committee with the support of Radford,Aon, which, beginning in 2011, has been retained to conduct comprehensive reviews of the Company’s executive compensation practices.

Our peer companies for 20182021 compensation evaluation were selected prior to the start of 20182021 in consultation with RadfordAon on the basis of their similarity to us in terms of competition for talent, their status as a commercial or near-commercial stage company,business segment and size metrics, including market capitalization, revenue, levelheadcount and other financial attributes, phase of products in development, research and development expenditures, employee number, and market capitalization. Radfordbusiness model. Aon also qualitatively evaluated each company based on business focus and corporate strategy. For the 2021 peer group, Aon also took into account Amarin’s planned headcount expansion.

The Remuneration Committee considered the foregoing analysis in selecting the following 1817 publicly-traded peer companies for use in evaluating compensation actions in the 20182021 fiscal year:

 

Accorda Therapeutics

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

  Eagle Pharmaceuticals

Halozyme Therapeutics*

  Repligen Corporation*

Pacira Biosciences*

AMAG Pharmaceuticals*

Akcea Therapeutics*

  Halozyme Therapeutics*

Intercept Pharmaceuticals*

  SciClone Pharmaceuticals*

PTC Therapeutics*

Amicus Therapeutics*

Akebia Therapeutics

  ImmunoGen*

Ionis Pharmaceuticals*

  Spectrum Pharmaceuticals*

Repligen Corporation*

Arena Pharmaceuticals*

Alkermes*

  Lexicon

Ironwood Pharmaceuticals*

  Sucampo

Supernus Pharmaceuticals*

Corcept Therapeutics*

Emergent BioSolutions

  Pacira

Jazz Pharmaceuticals*

  Supernus Pharmaceuticals*

United Therapeutics

Depomed*

Exelixis*

  Momenta Pharmaceuticals

Neurocrine Biosciences*

  Vanda Pharmaceuticals*

 

*

Included in prior-year peer group.

In addition to the peer group above, the Remuneration Committee also reviews competitive compensation data from the RadfordAon Global Life Sciences Compensation Survey. For 20182021 compensation decisions, the Radford survey group included 34 publicly traded biopharmaceutical companies with fewer than 5,000between 300 and 3,000 employees, annual revenue under five million dollars, and market value between $200 million and $12.0$1.5 billion, and market capitalization of between $500 million and $8.0 billion. Seventeen companies in our named peer group participated in this market survey. For benchmarking purposes, RadfordAon then developed a competitivefinal market composite of which 50% isdata point based equally on proxy data from the named peer group and 50% is based on a market survey composite. Radforddata. Aon then assessed Amarin’s 2018the Company’s 2021 compensation against market pay elements such as base salary, target short-term incentives as a percentage of base salary, target total cash compensation, long-term incentives and target total direct compensation. Additionally, Amarin’sthe Company’s incumbent officers were matched to benchmark positions according to each officer’s primary responsibilities.

The Remuneration Committee reviews the Company’s list of peer companies periodicallyannually to reflect changes in market capitalization, developments at the Company relative to its peer companies, and other factors.

For purposes of compensation for 2019, the Remuneration Committee, with the advice of Radford, examined our 2018 peer group in light of our continued growth throughout 2018, the stage of our commercialization efforts, changes in our market capitalization, and changes in the size and status of comparative companies. With reference to these and other key business metrics, the Remuneration Committee approved the following 20 companies as our 2019 peer group for evaluating compensation actions for 2019:

Accorda Therapeutics*ExelixisPacira Pharmaceuticals*
Akcea TherapeuticsHalozyme Therapeutics*PTC Therapeutics
Alnylam PharmaceuticalsImmunoGen*Repligen Corporation*
AMAG Pharmaceuticals*Intercept PharmaceuticalsSpectrum Pharmaceuticals*
Clovis OncologyIonis PharmaceuticalsSupernus Pharmaceuticals*
Corcept Therapeutics*Ironwood PharmaceuticalsVanda Pharmaceuticals*
Eagle Pharmaceuticals*Momenta Pharmaceuticals*

*

Included in prior-year peer group.

Implementation of Objectives

In fiscal 2018,year 2021, our executive compensation program consisted of the following forms of compensation, each of which areis described below in greater detail:

 

Base Salary

 

Annual Incentive Bonus

 

Equity Compensation (subject to time and/or performance vesting)

 

Employee Benefit Programs

In general, our Remuneration Committee aims to set executives’ total cash compensation (base salary plus target bonus) at levels near the 50th percentile for executives with similar roles in the Company’s peer group. Long-term incentive awards include stock options and restricted stock units and the value of such awards is generally targeted at the 50th percentile of our peer group. Our Remuneration Committee believes that the 50th percentile for total compensation is the minimum total compensation level that will allow us to attract and retain highly skilled executives.

Base Salary

Overview

Our Remuneration Committee aims to set executives’ base salaries, in the aggregate, at levels near the 50th percentile of salaries of executives with similar roles at the Company’s peer group. The Remuneration Committee believes it is important to provide adequate fixed compensation to our executive officers working in a highly volatile and competitive industry. The Remuneration Committee’s choice of this target percentile reflects consideration of our shareholders’ interests in paying what is necessary to attract and retain qualified executives and achieve our corporate goals, while conserving cash and equity as much as practicable. We believe that, given the industry in which we operate and our compensation philosophy and objectives, base salaries at the 50th percentile are generally sufficient to retain our current executives and to hire new executives when and as required. In determining appropriate base salary levels for a given executive officer, the Remuneration Committee also considers the following factors:

 

individual performance of the executive, as well as overall performance of the Company, during the prior year;

 

level of responsibility, including breadth, scope and complexity of the position;

 

level of experience and expertise of the executive;

 

internal review of the executive’s compensation relative to other executives to ensure internal equity;

 

level of the executive’s compensation in the form of equity incentive awards; and

 

executive officer compensation levels at other similar companies to ensure competitiveness.

Salaries for executive officers are determined on an individual basis at the time of hire and are set to be competitive with peer companies in our industry. Adjustments to base salary are considered annually in light of each executive officer’s individual performance, the Company’s performance and compensation levels at peer companies in our industry, as well as changes in job responsibilities or promotion. The Chief Executive Officer assists the Remuneration Committee in its annual review of the base salaries of other executive officers based on the foregoing criteria.

Changes in Base Salaries for Fiscal 20182021

In January 2018,2021, the Remuneration Committee approved salary increases, effective February 1, 2021, for 2018 an average salary increase of 3.5% for all employees other than certainthe named executive officers including those identified below, each of whom received individually targeted salary increases.as set forth below. These increases were determined to take into consideration the rate of inflation and to approximate the estimated rate of compensation increase in the Company’s peer group.

Individual

  2020 Base Salary   2021 Base Salary   % Increase 

Dr. Ketchum

  $530,000   $545,900    3.0

Mr. Kalb

  $460,000   $475,200    3.3

Mr. Berg

  $460,000   $475,200    3.3

Mr. Thero

  $820,000   $844,600    3.0

Mr. Kennedy

  $530,000   $545,000    2.8

In the case ofconnection with his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2021, Mr. Thero, aMikhail’s base salary of $664,800, effective February 1, 2018, was approved.increased to $750,000. This base salary was targetedis at the 50th25th percentile for Chief Executive Officers within our peer group. In the case ofWhen Mr. Kennedy, a salary of $462,300,Marks was hired as our Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, effective February 1, 2018, was approved. Thisin August 2021, his base salary was higher thanapproved at $475,000, below the 50th percentile for officers of similar position within our peer group; this determination was made in light of the Remuneration Committee’s recognition of Mr. Kennedy’s extensive experience and significant contributions to the Company during his tenure with the Company, in particular in connection with our ongoing regulatory

group.

efforts, several litigation matters and continued advancement of the Company’s intellectual property estate. In the case of Dr. Ketchum, a salary of $462,300, effective February 1, 2018, was approved. This base salary was higher than the 50th percentile for officers of similar position within our peer group; this determination was made in light of the Remuneration Committee’s recognition of Dr. Ketchum’s extensive experience and significant contributions to the Company during his tenure with the Company, in particular in connection with our ongoing regulatory efforts and continued advancement of the Company’sREDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes trial, the scope of which is larger than advanced by most peer sized companies. In the case of Mr. Kalb, a salary of $424,400, effective February 1, 2018, was approved. This base salary approximated the 50th percentile for CFOs within our peer group; this determination was made in light of the Remuneration Committee’s recognition of Mr. Kalb’s experience and his contributions to the Company during his tenure with the Company, in particular in connection with strengthening our balance sheet and managing our cash flow. In the case of Mr. Salyer, a salary of $459,000, effective February 1, 2018, was approved. This base salary was higher than the 50th percentile for Chief Commercial Officers within our peer group; this determination was made in light of Mr. Salyer’s compensation prior to joining the Company and the Remuneration Committee’s recognition of his experience.

Cash Incentive Awards

The Company also provides executive officers with the opportunity to earn annual performance-based cash bonuses, which are specifically designed to reward executives for overall corporate performance as well as, for executives other than the Chief Executive Officer, individual performance in a given year.

The Board has adopted a Management Incentive Compensation Plan (“MICP”), under which the Remuneration Committee each year determines and approves corporate and individual performance goals and achievement of these goals for purposes of determining annual performance-based cash bonuses. The MICP is intended to provide structure and predictability regarding the determination of performance-based cash bonuses. Specifically, the MICP is intended to:

 

 (i)

increase management focus on realistic goals that are challenging but achievable and intended to create value for shareholders;

(ii)

encourage management to work as a team to achieve the Company’s goals;

 

 (iii)

encourage individuals to realize goals that are meaningful to the Company;

 

 (iv)

provide incentives for management to strive for achievement above and beyond the Company goals; and

 

 (v)

help attract and retain high quality senior management personnel.

The MICP provides that the bonus potential for our executive officers will be established on an annual basis by the Remuneration Committee. Under the MICP, the actual amount of the bonus paid is calculated on a formulaic basis based upon achievement ofpre-determined performance goals. In order to be eligible to receive a bonus, the Company must have achieved at least a specified percentage of the corporate and individual goals for that year. The corporate goals and the relative weighting of the corporate and individual performance goals, as well as the relative weighting for each individual of individual performance goals, are established by the Remuneration Committee on an annual basis, shortly after our Board approves our annual operating plan.plan (referred to herein as the Company’s “2021 operating plan” or the “Company’s plan”). The Remuneration Committee has determined it appropriate to have our Chief Executive Officer’s goals match our corporate goals and for no portion of his annual incentive bonus to be determined based on individual performance goals. For all other executive officers, individual goals are determined on an annual basis by the Remuneration Committee based on their areas of functional responsibility.

Under the MICP, the Remuneration Committee reserves the right to make subjective assessments of executive performance and to separately reward performance beyond established individual or corporate goals and targets, and to award a smaller or larger bonus than provided for in the MICP, or to award no bonus.

For fiscal 2018,year 2021, the target bonus potential for our management employees as a percentage of base salary ranged from 75%80% for our former President and Chief Executive Officer, 45%70% for our current President and Chief Executive Officer, 50% for our Executive Vice President, 40%Presidents, 40-50% for our

Senior Vice Presidents, 30%30-35% for our Vice Presidents, and 15 to 25%15-25% for our Directors and Managers. All of the bonus potential for both our current and former President and Chief Executive Officer was tied to the 20182021 corporate goals.

Fiscal 2018Year 2021 Annual Bonus Incentive

Following our announcementUpon completion of the positive results ofREDUCE-IT study, in December 2018,fiscal year 2021, the Remuneration Committee assessed the CompanyCompany’s performance against corporate performance goals established for 2021 and, for executive officers other than our executive officer’scurrent and former President and Chief Executive Officer, the executive’s overall performance and achievement ofagainst individual performance goals established for 2021. In accordance with our customary practice, theREDUCE-IT stretch goal established Board approved the 2021 corporated goals in 2018.

Set forth below is thepre-specified stretch goal, which achievement that was approved byDecember 2020. Although during 2021 neither the Remuneration Committee nor the Board approved any adjustments to the goals approved in assessing overall performance for the 2018 fiscal year and reviewed at the December 2018 meeting2020 in light of the Remuneration Committee, as well ascontinued impact of the relative weighting of this goal and the Remuneration Committee’s determination of achievement for this goal.

Pre-SpecifiedCOVID-19 “Stretch” Goal:

REDUCE-IT: Achieve 20% or more in relative risk reduction for primary endpoint: 50%

In addition, upon completion of fiscal 2018, the Remuneration Committee assessedpandemic or other unanticipated events, the Company did take into account the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations when determining achievement and, for executives other than our executive officer’s overall performance againstcurrent and former President and Chief Executive Officer (for whom the bonus potential is tried entirely to the achievement of corporate andgoals), adjusted the individual performance goals established in 2018.achievement level to be eligible for a bonus from 80% to 70% of the person’s individual goals.

Set forth below are the corporate goals (except for theREDUCE-IT stretch goal discussed above) that were approved by the Remuneration Committee in assessing overall performance for the 20182021 fiscal year, as well as the relative weighting of these goals and the Remuneration Committee’s determination of achievement for each goal.

2018

2021 Corporate GoalsGoals*

U.S. Commercial (40%Profitability Improvement (20%):. These goals established target performance for the Company regarding the commercialization of Vascepa.VASCEPA in the United States. The specific goals were as follows:

 

Revenues: Achieve net revenue target of $245.0 million

Improve profit from U.S. commercial activities to exceed $200 million** (80%)

 

Compliance: Favorable outside audit report regarding compliance program and no lost claim due to untruthful or misleading statements to healthcare professionals

Compliance: Favorable year-end report to our Board on adherence to, and compliance with, corporate compliance program and no lost claim due to untruthful or misleading statements to healthcare professionals (20%)

 

Pre-REDUCE-IT Readiness:Increase Vascepa awareness; launch media campaign regarding MARINE indication*

Post-REDUCE-IT Results:Hire, train and activate expanded sales team within 90 days of corporate approval*

REDUCE-IT (30%): These goals established target performance for the Company regarding theREDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes trial. The specific goals were as follows:

 

*

Close-out Plan:Perform and complete all required procedures anticipating adjudicationCertain of targeted number of primary events by target dates; submit regulatory approval applications by target deadline*

Final Study Quality:Achieve target rate for patients with compliance data, target rate of final visit contact with patients on study, and target rate of patients with vital status information

Timing of Publication: Complete study report for consideration as late breaker for American Heart Association in 2018, and, assuming success, publish results intop-tier journal in parallel with late breaker presentation in the fourth quarter of 2018

Media/KOL Education and Support: Engage withmetrics under the advisory board and national / regional key opinion leader (“KOL”) groups;REDUCE-IT results reported by major national media with supportive statements from KOLs

Quality & Supply (10%): These goals established target performance for the Company regarding the commercial and clinical supply. The specific goals were as follows:

Quality: Ensure uninterrupted supply of commercial and clinical material based on supply chain schedule

Supply: Purchase inventory needed for operating plan (plus safety stock) at an average price consistent with operating plan*

Financial and Public Relations / Investor Relations (20%): These goals established target performance for the Company regarding the operational finance performance and with respect to public and investor relations matters. The specific goals were as follows:

Cash Outflow from Operations: Ensure gross cash outflow is not greater than operating plan*

Cash Flow Positive from Operations(excluding R&D, interest and royalty costs): Achieve for full year 2018

Financing: Complete financings as needed, subject to corporate approval, to ensure the Company is adequately financed

Pre-Specified “Stretch” Goals: The specific goals were as follows:

Exceed net revenue target per 2018 Operating Plan ($245 million): Zero for < 5% above net revenue target; 10% for 5% or more above net revenue target increasing ratably to 100% maximum for achievement of 50% above net revenue target

*

The above-described metricsMICP tied to the 2018 Operating Plan2021 operating plan above and throughout this Amendment include highly sensitive data, including international expansion projections, inventory purchase requirements, cash flows, expense targets, research goalsoutflows and clinical trials.support for supplier capacity expansion. We do not disclose the specific target levels for these metrics, including as they inform certain individual performance goals, because we believe that such disclosure would result in competitive harm to our Company. We purposely set these target levels at aggressive levels. Revealing these metrics, including the reasoning for setting targets at specific levels, could potentially reveal insights about our commercialization plans and research and other objectives that our competitors could use against us in the marketplace for similar pharmaceutical products. We believe each of these target levels werewas designed to be challenging but attainable under assumed conditions if we had what we considered to be a successful year.

**

In 2021, the Company utilized a profitability metric rather than a revenue-based performance metric to further encourage top-line growth and administrative efficiencies. The profitability figure above refers to U.S. gross margin minus U.S. sales and marketing related expenses.

European Commercialization (20%). These goals establish target performance for the Company regarding the commercialization of VAZKEPA in the European Union (“EU”). The specific goals were as follows:

Secure approval of marketing authorization (“MAA”) for CV risk reduction by the end of the first quarter of 2021 (25%)

Launch commercially in Germany in the third quarter of 2021 (50%)

Secure market access with pricing consistent with the Company’s plan in at least one country (25%)

International Expansion (10%). These goals establish target performance for the Company regarding the commercialization of VAZKEPA in the rest of the world. The specific goals were as follows:

China: Support Edding’s submission for VASCEPA regulatory approval in mainland China (50%)

China: Garner recommendation from medical society regarding use of VASCEPA based on REDUCE-IT results (25%)

Canada and the Middle East and North Africa : Support revenue growth consistent with the Company’s plan (25%)

R&D/Business Development (20%). These goals establish target performance for the Company regarding research and development, as well as business development activities. The specific goals were as follows:

Secure an in-license for development of (or develop organically) a new product or a new indication capable of supporting at least a specified amount in peak sales and advance such opportunity to status of clinically viable with business plan supported by our Board (75%)

Complete ongoing COVID-19 studies (25%)

Supply (20%). These goals established target performance for the Company regarding the commercial and clinical supply. The specific goals were as follows:

Supply price: Purchase active pharmaceutical ingredient at an average price consistent with the Company’s plan (50%)

Suppliers: Ensure adequate qualified supply to meet 2021 demand and to exit 2021 with capacity on-line (or schedule to be on-line) to meet or exceed a specified percentage of base case revenue scenarios for 2022 and 2023 as determined for next year’s plan (50%)

Financial (10%). This goal established target performance for the Company regarding the operational finance performance. The specific goal was as follows:

Cash outflow from operations: Ensure gross cash outflow is not greater than the Company’s 2021 operating plan

In reviewing the Company’s performance against thepre-specified corporate goals set by the Remuneration Committee as described above, the Remuneration Committee determined the goals were achieved as follows: (i) that each of

the commercial goals was achieved at the 100% level, except for the achievement of revenuesU.S. Commercial Profitability Improvement goal which was achieved at the 90% level, resulting in a weighted score of 35% for this component of the corporate goals; (ii) that each of theREDUCE-IT goals was achieved at the 100% level, resulting in a combined weighted score of 30%20% for this component of the corporate goals; (iii) that each of

the quality and supply goalsEuropean Commercialization goal was achieved at the 100% level, resulting in a combinedweighted score of 20% for this component of the corporate goals;

the International Expansion goal was achieved at the 75% level, resulting in a weighted score of 7.5% for this component of the corporate goals;

the R&D/Business Development goal was achieved at the 25% level, resulting in a weighted score of 5% for this component of the corporate goals;

the Supply goal was achieved at the 100% level, resulting in a weighted score of 20% for this component of the corporate goals; and

the Financial goal was achieved at the 100% level, resulting in a weighted score of 10% for this component of the corporate goals; and (iv) that each of the financial and public relations/investor relations goals was achieved at the 100% level, resulting in a combined weighted score of 20% for this component of the corporate goals.

In total, the Remuneration Committee determined that thesepre-defined corporate goals were achieved at the 95%approximately 83% level. In addition, theThe Remuneration Committee determined that theno pre-defined net revenue stretch goal was not achieved and that theREDUCE-IT stretch goal was achieved, resultingachieved.

In addition, to provide added incentive and reward for potential key value adding accomplishment, “stretch” award opportunities were set for certain of the named executive officers if specific accomplishments were successful, including an additional (i) $75,000 payable to Dr. Ketchum if the European Commission approved VASCEPA before June 30, 2021 with a label consistent with prior presentation to our Board; (ii) $50,000 payable to Mr. Mikhail for each successful market access in certain EU geographies within 18 months of EU approval, subject to certain pricing parameters; (iii) $75,000 payable to Mr. Kennedy conditioned upon governmental support for VASCEPA as a total score of 50%COVID treatment; and (iv) $100,000 payable to Mr. Kennedy for successful legal achievements related to the stretch goals and 145% cumulative achievement of thepre-defined corporate and stretch goals.

generic market.

Individual Performance-Based Cash Bonus Awards

John F. Thero,Karim Mikhail, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

The Remuneration Committee calculated Mr. Thero’s 2018Mikhail’s 2021 MICP bonus to be $473,670$430,000 in connection with, and based entirely on, the Company’s achievement of base corporate goals as described above (95%(83% level). This amount is separate from the $249,300 cash bonus award the Remuneration Committee calculated for Mr. Thero based on the 50%

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D., President of target bonus amount in connection with the Company’s achievement of thepre-definedREDUCE-IT stretch goal described above.

Joseph T. Kennedy,Research and Development, Executive Vice President General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives, SecretaryChief Scientific Officer

For Mr. Kennedy,Dr. Ketchum, individual performance goals for fiscal 2018year 2021 were focused on the areas outlined below:

Litigation: 25%European Commercialization: 35%

 

a)

ANDA litigation: Manage legal resources to support progression of the ANDA litigation

Secure first-cycle positive opinion on EU MAA from the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) and European Commission approval

b)

IP litigation: Aggressively assert Amarin patents, subject to corporate decisions from time to time

Supplement Issues: 35%

a)

Achieve or take further legal steps to help distinguish Vascepa from dietary supplements

SEC Compliance/Investor Relations: 10%

a)

Statutory: Ensure timely filing of SEC filings and compliance of public disclosures with applicable law

b)

IR: Provide timely and constructive advice on investor relations issues while helping to ensure accurate disclosures consistent with industry practice

General Corporate: 10%

a)

Operational support: Ensure timely value-adding legal advice to support all Company functions, including business development, finance, regulatory, managed care, sales and marketing, manufacturing, human resources and general corporate matters, the effectiveness of which will be judged by the Chief Executive Officer and Board

b)

Minutes: Timely completion of committee meeting minutes for meetings attended, conduct orderly annual meeting

c)

Documentation: Oversee legal systems to help manage risks affecting the company and ensure access to key information as needed, including disaster recovery, document control and long-term staff turnover considerations

Pharmaceutical Industry Compliance: 10%

a)

Industry: Stay abreast of developments on First Amendment issues and advise company on pharmaceutical industry compliance matters consistent with First Amendment settlement, including disclosures regarding knowledge derived from theREDUCE-IT study

Intellectual Property: 10%

a)

Patents: Obtain and defend robust patent coverage for Company products consistent with Company plan, including prompt review ofREDUCE-IT results and creating appropriate documentation to protect the Company’s intellectual property rights

Support commercial launch in Germany

Leverage “Reliance Route” to submit UK MAA within one month of CHMP positive opinion; secure first-cycle approval of UK MAA for CV risk reduction by the end of 2021 and support product launch in UK per the Company’s plan

Incorporate Swissmedic pre-submission feedback into final dossier and submit Swiss MAA

Determine and implement short-and long-term strategies for meeting country-specific Responsible Person requirements per the Company’s plan

Submit variations to add certain drug substance suppliers and secure EU approval by end of 2021

Successfully complete required process validation lots to enable EU launch

Qualify EU-based packaging facility and submit variation to MAA per the Company’s plan

U.S. Commercialization and International Expansion: 30%

Support existing ex-US partnerships and future potential partnering activities throughout 2021

Ensure product quality and uninterrupted supplies that meet near-term and future commercial demands and research needs throughout 2021

Continue data flow for REDUCE-IT throughout 2021

Future Development Strategy and Life Cycle / Pipeline Management: 35%

In-license for development (or develop organically) a new product or a new indication capable of supporting a specified amount in peak sales and advance such opportunity to status of clinically viable with business plan supported by the Board and execute per the Company’s plan

Support completion of ongoing COVID-19 studies and help create recommended next steps for presentation to the Board by the end of 2021

Submit pre-investigation new drug rationale for a proscribed indication pursuant the Company’s plan

Under the Company’s MICP, 75% of Mr. Kennedy’sDr. Ketchum’s bonus for 20182021 was based on achievement of the corporate goals (in proportion to the extent such goals were achieved) and 25% of his bonus was based on achievement of his individual goals (in proportion to the extent such goals were achieved).

The Remuneration Committee approved the achievement of 20182021 corporate goals at the 95%83% level as described above, in addition to the 50% achievement of theREDUCE-IT stretch goal.above. In reviewing the above-described individual performance goals, the Remuneration Committee determinedconcluded that Mr. KennedyDr. Ketchum had fully achieved all of his individual goals (100%).at the 95% level.

The Remuneration Committee thus calculated Mr. Kennedy’s 2018Dr. Ketchum’s 2021 MICP bonus to be $200,234,$258,000 (not including the special achievements described below), or 96%85% of his target bonus amount. The calculation was based on 75% weight given to the 95%83% achievement of 20182021 corporate base goals and 25% weight given to the 100%95% achievement of Mr. Kennedy’sDr. Ketchum’s individual goals. This amount is separate from the $104,018 cash bonus award the Remuneration Committee calculated for Mr. Kennedy based on the 50% of target bonus amount in connection with the Company’s achievement of thepre-definedREDUCE-IT stretch goal described above.

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D., President of Research and Development,Michael W. Kalb, Senior Vice President and Chief ScientificFinancial Officer, Assistant Secretary (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

For Dr. Ketchum,Mr. Kalb, individual performance goals for fiscal 2018year 2021 were focused on the areas outlined below:below as:

REDUCE-IT: 80%Business Financial Management: 30%

 

a)

Close-out plan:Perform and complete all required procedures anticipating adjudication of targeted number of primary events by target dates; submit regulatory approval applications by target deadline*

Ensure gross cash outflow is not greater than the Company’s 2021 operating plan (except if supported by higher than plan revenues)

b)

Final study quality: Achieve target rate for patients with compliance data, target rate of final visit contact with patients on study, and target rate of patients with vital status information

c)

Timing: Complete topline data analyses in time to support a late breaker presentation for American Heart Association in 2018

d)

Publication and congress support: Work withREDUCE-IT steering committee and medical affairs team to secure publication ofREDUCE-IT results intop-tier journal in parallel with late breaker presentation in the fourth quarter of 2018

Additional Clinical &Non-Clinical Initiatives: 10%

a)

Serum to plasma & red blood cell (RBC) correlation research: Support fatty acid measurements and report completion and correlation analyses by target dates *

b)

Mechanisticnon-clinical and clinical initiatives: SupportREDUCE-IT differentiation through mechanisticnon-clinical and clinical initiatives aimed at defining eicosapentaenoic acid mechanisms of action/uniqueness of activity; support three or more publications; consider/support new mechanistic studies through detailed interactions with six or more potential investigators; continue ongoing assessment for investigator initiated trials, design, conduct, and publication of seven or more investigator initiated trials

c)

Clinical/Scientific support of other Departments: Provide timely support and training to various other departments including regulatory, medical affairs, business development, corporate strategy, finance, legal and commercial teams*

Regulatory & Quality Control: 10%

a)

Ex-US partnership: Support clinical trial application approval and initiation of registration clinical trial(s) in China; support registration activities in Middle East and North Africa territories, achieving

approval in at least two countries for partner to market Vascepa before the end of 2018; supportpre-NDS meeting and create regulatory strategy with partner in Canada

Manage cash balance and net operating cash flow such that it is equal to or greater than the Company’s 2021 operating plan: create and implement quarterly internal risk/return analysis in compliance with investment policy and improve cash inflow/outflow analysis with quarterly explanations of any major plan variances leading to improved cash forecasting to satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer

 

b)

Existing NDA maintenance: Ensure all regulatory required reporting elements are prepared and submitted on time; support vendors’ timely transitions from paper drug master files to electronic submissions; and ensure they have no impact on Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (“CMC”) portions of new Drug application (“NDA”)

Improve processes by which 2021 and 2022 financial assumptions are updated on a rolling basis and goal performance are reviewed quarterly with department and functional leads to enhance 2021 accountability and to ensure alignment/identify changes; present significant assumption changes to the Chief Executive Officer on a timely basis as warranted; launch formal operating plan kickoff approximately one week following the Company’s strategic meeting and complete the operating plan, including certain goals, at least one week before December Board meeting

Financial Reporting, Expense Control and Tax: 25%

 

c)

Post-marketing safety compliance: Review and assess all serious adverse events and timely submit all required reports in compliance with strategic operating plans

Maintain operational expenses for Finance/Accounting and Investor Relations which do not exceed the Company’s 2021 operating plan

 

*

The above-described metrics tied to the 2018 Operating Plan include highly sensitive data including research goals and clinical trials. We do not disclose the specific target levels for these metrics because we believe that such disclosure would result in competitive harm to our Company. We purposely set these target levels at aggressive levels. Revealing these metrics, including the reasoning for setting targets at specific levels, could potentially reveal insights about our commercialization plans and research and other objectives that our competitors could use against us in the marketplace for similar pharmaceutical products. We believe each of these target levels were designed to be challenging but attainable under assumed conditions if we had what we considered to be a successful year.

Implement efficiencies relating to auditor, press release and website matters related to quarterly and annual reporting

Ensure no material control weaknesses from 2021 compliance testing or from 2020 compliance testing completed in 2021

Update policies and procedures to ensure adequacy of infrastructure in Europe to ensure timely reporting (including statutory reporting), tax compliance and value-added tax compliance

Work with accountants and advisors to establish internal controls over financial reporting throughout Europe by the end of the second quarter of 2021

Continue creation and implementation of EU corporate structure with Legal, including maintaining consistency with current corporate structure; update transfer pricing study for current structure

Commercial & Business Development Support: 35%

Work with U.S. commercial team to proactively address and respond to market dynamics (e.g., COVID-19 and generic entry) to ensure achievement of target U.S. commercial operating income

Build the necessary European financial infrastructure to ensure timely and accurate financial closes and reporting

In conjunction with the business development team, support the evaluation of potential transactions per the Company’s plan, including providing and updating corporate forecasts as applicable and providing other financial support

Investor Relations: 10%

Coordinate U.S. website refresh to be live by February 2021, ensure it is perpetually updated and ensure that potential increase in activity from EU investors is addressed consistent with peer company standards

Assist Investor Relations with responsiveness to investor inquiries

Draft press releases, to the extent possible, at least one week prior to target release dates

Under the Company’s MICP, 75% of Dr. Ketchum’sMr. Kalb’s bonus for 20182021 was based on achievement of the corporate goals (in proportion to the extent such goals were achieved) and 25% of his bonus was based on achievement of his individual goals (in proportion to the extent such goals were achieved).

The Remuneration Committee approved the achievement of 20182021 corporate goals based at the 95%83% level as described above, in addition to the 50% achievement of theREDUCE-IT stretch goal.above. In reviewing the above-describedabove- described individual performance goals, the Remuneration Committee concluded that Dr. KetchumMr. Kalb had fully achieved allapproximately 96% of his individual goals (100%).goals.

The Remuneration Committee calculated Dr. Ketchum’s 2018Mr. Kalb’s 2021 MICP bonus to be $177,986,$204,930, or 96%86.25% of his target bonus amount. The calculation was based on 75% weight given to the 95%83% achievement of 20182021 corporate base goals and 25% weight given to the 100%96% achievement of Dr. Ketchum’sMr. Kalb’s individual goals. This amount is separate from the $92,460 cash bonus award the Remuneration Committee calculated for Dr. Ketchum based on the 50% of target bonus amount in connection with the Company’s achievement of thepre-definedREDUCE-IT stretch goal described above.

Michael W. Kalb, SeniorAaron D. Berg, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialCommercial Officer Assistant Secretary (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

For Mr. Kalb,Berg, individual performance goals for fiscal 2018year 2021 were focused on the areas outlined below as:

Financial Reporting & Budgeting: 40%U.S. Commercial Profitability: 50%

 

a)

Manage cash balance and net operating cash flow such that it is equal to or greater than the operating plan*

Improve profit from U.S. commercial activities per the Company’s plan

 

b)

Timely completion and filing of all required SEC and foreign statutory filings

c)

Timely file all domestic and international tax returns

d)

Maintain tax compliance and professional fees for routine items

e)

Shorten quarterly close process

f)

Assume lead role in preparation of Board of Directors meeting presentations

Favorable year-end report to the Board on adherence to and compliance with corporate compliance program and no lost claim due to untruthful or misleading statements to healthcare professionals

Internal Controls: 15%Sales: 20%

 

a)

Ensure no material control weaknesses from 2018 compliance testing or from 2017 compliance testing completed in 2018

Strategic & Tax Matters, including Preparation forConduct comprehensive analysis of REDUCE-ITRead-out:COVID-19/generic 15%launch impact and recommend prudent optimization strategy; subject to Board approval, implement in the second quarter of 2021 and achieve strategic triggers

Increase sales professionals’ cost-effective productivity as per 2021 operation plan

Increase sales reach and productivity of target as per the Company’s 2021 operating plan

Marketing: 20%

 

a)

Working Capital Line: Engage with financial institutions to obtain asset-based lending, subject to receiving waiver from debt holder and subject to corporate approval

Before the end of the first quarter of 2021, create and implement strategies and tactics to increase awareness of the need for preventative CV care as patients returning to routine medical care and achieve objectives established in such plans

b)

Compliance: Work with tax advisors to comply with all Internal Revenue Service (“IRS), and other taxing authorities, requests for information

c)

Tax: Complete assessment of global tax position for the Company and subsidiaries considering potential changes in U.S. corporate tax law and evaluate discontinuing inactive subsidiaries

Commercial & Business Development Support:Managed Markets and Trade: 10%

 

a)

Support: Support commercial operations, including pricing and contracts review and negotiation and decision-making regarding managed care and marketing to achieve gross margin levels as per operating plan*; support business development, including diligence, and other strategic initiatives as needed

Increase formulary access for covered lives in accordance with the Company’s 2021 operating plan

b)

Strategic Model: Work with investment bank to create robust multi-scenario long-term model to support strategic analysis

c)

Fund Raising: Coordinate successful fund raising efforts as needed, subject to Board approval

Investor Relations: 20%

a)

Financial and Corporate Communications: Oversee and direct all financial and corporate communications by developing, managing and controlling the message platform and information flow; benchmark current communications metrics and obtain Chief Executive Officer and CFO approval for 2018 improvement metric

b)

Investor Outreach: Complete peer ownership analysis, identify at least 10 high quality investors, and establish meetings with these firms; create plan for expanded use of social media and, subject to necessary approval, implement such plan

*

The above-described metrics tied to the 2018 Operating Plan include highly sensitive data including research goals and clinical trials. We do not disclose the specific target levels for these metrics because we believe that such disclosure would result in competitive harm to our Company. We purposely set these target levels at aggressive levels. Revealing these metrics, including the reasoning for setting targets at specific levels, could potentially reveal insights about our commercialization plans and research and other objectives that our competitors could use against us in the marketplace for similar pharmaceutical products. We believe each of these target levels were designed to be challenging but attainable under assumed conditions if we had what we considered to be a successful year.

Under the Company’s MICP, 75% of Mr. Kalb’sBerg’s bonus for 20182021 was based on achievement of the corporate goals (in proportion to the extent such goals were achieved) and 25% of his bonus was based on achievement of his individual goals (in proportion to the extent such goals were achieved).

The Remuneration Committee approved the achievement of 20182021 corporate goals based at the 95%83% level as described above, in addition to the 50% achievement of theREDUCE-IT stretch goal.above. In reviewing the above-described individual performance goals, the Remuneration Committee concluded that Mr. KalbBerg had achieved 95%90.5% of his individual goals (reflecting partial achievement of the goal pertaining to assuming lead role in preparation of Board of Directors meeting presentations and creation and implementation of investor outreach initiatives).goals.

The Remuneration Committee calculated Mr. Kalb’s 2018Berg’s 2021 MICP bonus to be $161,272,$233,406, or 95%approximately 85% of his target bonus amount. The calculation was based on 75% weight given to the 95%83% achievement of 20182021 corporate base goals and 25% weight given to the 95%90.5% achievement of Mr. Kalb’sBerg’s individual goals. This amount is separate from

Jason M. Marks, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Office and Corporate Secretary

In connection with his appointment as Amarin’s Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in August 2021 and pursuant to his employment agreement with the $84,880 cash bonus awardCompany, the Remuneration Committee calculatedapproved a 2021 bonus amount for Mr. Kalb based onMarks in the 50%amount of target bonus amount in connection with the Company’s achievement of thepre-definedREDUCE-IT stretch goal described above.$207,219.

Mark W. Salyer, Former Senior ViceJohn T. Thero, former President and Chief CommercialExecutive Officer

For Mr. SalyerThero, pursuant to and conditioned upon Mr. Thero’s compliance with his separation agreement, Mr. Thero was not eligible for a 2021 annual bonus, calculated on a pro rata basis based on his 2021 service and subject to receivethe achievement of our Board’s approved corporate goals, with such bonus targeted at 80% level of his

base salary. Consistent with this arrangement, in January 2022, the Board approved a 2021 bonus underfor Mr. Thero in the MICPamount of $536,738

Joseph T. Kennedy, former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives, Secretary

For Mr. Kennedy, pursuant to and conditioned upon Mr. Kennedy’s compliance with his separation agreement, Mr. Kennedy was eligible for 2018 as a result2021 annual bonus, calculated on a pro rata basis based on his 2021 service and subject to the achievement of the terminationour Board’s approved corporate goals, with such bonus targeted at 50% of his employmentbase salary. Consistent with this arrangement, in January 2022, the CompanyBoard approved a 2021 bonus amount for Mr. Kennedy in April 2018.the amount of $216,824.

Special Incentive Bonus Programs

From time to time, the Remuneration Committee establishes special bonus programs to incentivize individual performance toward goals that are judged by the Remuneration Committee as important for corporate progress, very difficult to achieve, and of significant shareholder value if achieved.achieved or to reward exceptional achievement.

At the time that it approved annual bonuses for 2021, the Remuneration Committee approved an additional bonus of $50,000 for Mr. Mikhail for his significant achievements during 2021, including a smooth transition following Mr. Thero’s retirement, his vision and strategy, his leadership with the Go-To-Market strategy development, successes in driving progress in Europe, building out the management team and driving a performance-driven culture focused on meritocracy.

In December 2021, the Remuneration Committee approved a special retention bonus award for Dr. Ketchum in the amount of $25,000, in recognition of his undertaking additional business development responsibilities, and his performance with respect to such responsibilities.

Equity Compensation

Overview

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units. As an additionalimportant component of our compensation program, executive officers are eligible to receive equity compensation, which has historically been in the form of stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units. The Remuneration Committee grants stock options and restricted stock units (both time-based and performance-based) to executive officers to aid in their retention, to motivate them to assist with the achievement of both near-term and long-term corporate objectives and to align their interests with those of our shareholders by creating a return tied to the performance of our stock price. In determining the form, date of issuance and value of a grant, the Remuneration Committee considers the contributions and responsibilities of each executive officer, appropriate incentives for the achievement of our long-term growth, the size and value of grants made to other executives at peer companies holding comparable positions, individual achievement of designated performance goals, and the Company’s overall performance relative to corporate objectives.

We believe that equity awards, through stock options and restricted stock units, align the objectives of management with those of our shareholders with respect to long-term performance and success. We believe that equity awards serve as useful performance-recognition mechanisms with respect to key employees, as most awards are subject to time-based vesting provisions. Stock options are typically awarded to executive officers upon their hiring. We believe that such equity awards encourage executive officers to remain with the Company and also focus on our long-term performance as well as the achievement of specific performance goals.

Equity Award Grant Policy. We have an equity award grant policy that formalizes our process for granting equity-based awards to officers and employees. Under our equity award grant policy, all grants to executive officers must

be approved by our Board or Remuneration Committee and all grants to other employees must be granted within guidelines approved by our Board or Remuneration Committee. All stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our Ordinary Shares, calculated based on our closing market price on the applicable grant date. Under our equity award grant policy, equity awards will generally be granted as follows:

 

grants made in conjunction with the hiring of a new employee or the promotion of an existing employee will generally be made at meetings of the Remuneration Committee, and effective on the first trading day of the month following the later of (1) the hire date or the promotion date or (2) the date on which such grant is approved; and

grants made to existing employees other than in connection with a promotion will be made, if at all, on an annual basis and generally shall be made effective on the first trading day of the month following the date on which such grant is approved.

Equity Grants Awarded in Fiscal 2018Year 2021

In considering annual equity awards for our executive officers in 2018,2021, our Remuneration Committee aimed to grant equity at a levelthat generally targeted betweentargets the 50th andpercentile of the Company’s peer group, with some performance-based awards targeted at the 75th percentile of the Company’s peer group. Equity awards in 20182021 were comprised of a mix of time-based stock options (vesting over a four-year period), time-based restricted stock unit awards (vesting over a three-year period) and performance-based restricted stock unit awards (vesting tied to the achievement ofpre-defined performance milestones (specificallymilestones; including the achievement of both (i) a successful outcome of theREDUCE-IT study and(ii) pre-defined commercial salesrevenue milestones), and subsequent to such achievement, time-based vesting and acceleration in the event of a change in control). Equity awards in 2018made in 2021 were granted with a view towards both retaining and incentivizing our executives in future periods.

The grant date fair values of the equity awards granted to executive officers for the 20182021 fiscal year are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below and the number of shares subject to equity awards granted in 20182021 is reflected in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below.

With respect to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model required under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 and discussed further below, historical variable assumptions and other variables can cause model prices to be more or less than the actual value of an option when exercised or in an ultimate exit. Actual option value is instead based on stock performance, which can vary significantly from these historical variable assumption basedassumption-based valuation estimates. Because the actual value is based on stock performance, the Remuneration Committee believes that the equity awards granted create added and important alignment of management with our other shareholders regarding our long-term growth.

Employee Benefit Programs

Executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, in each case on the same basis as other employees, subject to applicable law. We also provide vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including executive officers, all of which we believe to be comparable to those provided at peer companies. These benefit programs are designed to enable us to attract and retain our workforce in a competitive marketplace. Health, welfare and vacation benefits ensure that we have a productive and focused workforce through reliable and competitive health and other benefits. Our executive officers participate in the same employee benefit plans as other employees in the Company on the same terms as such employees.

Our retirement savings plan (“401(k) Plan”) is atax-qualified retirement savings plan, pursuant to which all employees, including the named executive officers, are able to contribute certain amounts of their annual compensation, subject to limits prescribed by the IRS, which contributed amounts are eligible for a discretionary percentage match, in cash, as defined in the 401(k) Plan and determined by the Board of Directors. We recognized $0.7$1.9 million of related compensation expense for the 401(k) Plan for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deductibility of Executive Compensation.In making compensation decisions affecting our executive officers, the Remuneration Committee considers our ability to deduct under applicable federal corporate income tax law compensation payments made to executives. Specifically, the Remuneration Committee considers the requirements and impact of Section 162(m) of the Code. With respectUnder Section 162(m) of the Code compensation paid to taxable years before January 1, 2018,

remuneration in excesseach of the company’s “covered employees” that exceeds $1 million was exempt from this deduction limit if it qualified as “performance-based compensation” withinper taxable year is generally non-deductible for tax purposes unless the meaning of Section 162(m) and was payablecompensation qualifies for certain grandfathered exceptions for certain compensation paid pursuant to a written binding written agreementcontract in effect on November 2, 2017 that wasand not subsequently materially modified. Undermodified on or after such date.

Although the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, (1) the scope of Section 162(m) was expanded such that all named executive officers are “covered employees” and anyone who was a named executive officer in any year after 2016 will remain a covered employees for as long as he or she (or his or her beneficiaries) receive compensation from the Company and (2) the exception to the deduction limit for commission-based compensation and performance-based compensation was eliminated except with respect to certain grandfathered arrangements in effect as of November 2, 2017 that are not subsequently materially modified. Accordingly, compensation paid to our named executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017, as described above.

The Remuneration Committee considers tax implications as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Remuneration Committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions and believes that stockholder interests are best served if the Committee retains maximum flexibility to design executive compensation programs that meet stated business objectives. The Remuneration Committee considers the Section 162(m) rules as a factor in determining compensation, but does not necessarily limit compensation to amounts deductible under Section 162(m).

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board believes it is important to align the interests of our executive officers with those of its shareholders. To this end, in March 2013, the Board established Stock Ownership Guidelines for its executive officers. The guidelines require that each executive officer maintain an equity interest in the Company with a value at least equal to a multiple of the executive officer’s base salary, as follows:

 

Position

  

Target

Chief Executive Officer

  3x annual base salary

Other Executive Officers

  1x annual base salary

Equity interests that count toward the satisfaction of the ownership guidelines include the value of Ordinary Shares beneficiallyordinary shares owned (other than unvested restricted stock)(including shares purchased on the open market or issuableacquired upon the settlementexercise of vested restricted stock units.options). The calculation of an individual’s equity interest, however, does not include the value of stock options (whether or not vested), unvested restricted stock, and unvested restricted stock units, except unvested deferred stock units. Executive officers have five years from the date of the policy adoption in March 2013 or later commencement of their appointment as an executive officer to attain these ownership levels. If an executive officer does not meet the applicable guideline by the end of the five-year period, the officer is required to hold a minimum of 50% to 100% of the shares resulting from any future equity awards until the applicable guideline is met, net of shares sold or withheld to exercise stock options and pay withholding taxes. The Remuneration Committee, however, may make exceptions for any officer on whom this requirement could impose a financial hardship.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement,Amendment, all of the Company’s named executive officers have satisfied these ownership guidelines, or have time to do so.

Additionally, we have instituted Stock Ownership Guidelines for ournon-employee directors. For information regarding these guidelines, see the section entitled Director“Director Compensation—Non-Employee Director Compensation.

Clawback

As of the date of this Proxy Statement,Amendment, we do not have a formal compensation recovery policy, often referred to as a “clawback” policy, which would typically provide that the officers or directors subject to the

policy must reimburse the Company for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation improperly received. The Remuneration Committee intends to adopt a formal clawback policy once the final rules relating to such policies are issued pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act. The Company has not had an accounting restatement. Furthermore, the majority of the Company’s cash incentive awards have over the years been for matters pertaining to third-party regulatory approvals and other milestone achievements that are objective in nature or otherwise able to be evaluated by the Remuneration Committee without risk of accounting restatement.

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be (1) “soliciting material,” (2) “filed” with the SEC, (3) subject to Regulations 14A or 14C of the Exchange Act, or (4) subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. This report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any of our other filings under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on such review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

Submitted by the Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors

David Stack (Chairman)(Chairman until May 2022)

Jan van Heek

Kristine Peterson

*

Mr. Wold-Olsen was appointed to the Remuneration Committee as Chairman on May 16, 2022, after the reviews, discussions and determinations described above were conducted.

2018 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.indicated.

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Fiscal
Year
  Salary ($)  Bonus ($)(1)  Stock
Awards ($)(2)
  Option
Awards ($)(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)(4)
  All Other
Compensation ($)(7)
  Total ($) 

John F. Thero

  2018   660,383   —     1,409,800   1,405,914   722,970   6,712   4,205,779 

President and

Chief Executive

Officer

  2017   609,175   26,088   1,098,540   1,160,461   513,912   6,612   3,414,788 
  2016   575,275   —     504,000   561,689   530,974   6,512   2,178,450 
        

Joseph T. Kennedy

  2018   461,175   —     296,400   294,788   304,251   6,712   1,363,326 

Executive Vice
President,

General Counsel and

Strategic Initiatives,

Secretary

  2017   447,533   11,007   330,480   348,138   320,136   6,612   1,463,906 
  2016   432,542   12,685   112,000   127,656   227,315   6,512   918,710 
        
        
        

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

  2018   461,175   —     296,400   294,788   270,446   6,712   1,329,521 

President of
Research and

Development, Senior
Vice President and
Chief Scientific
Officer

  2017   447,533   9,717   266,220   280,621   194,330   6,612   1,205,033 
  2016   432,542   —     112,000   127,656   199,022   6,512   877,732 
        
        
        
        

Michael W. Kalb(5)

  2018   423,367   —     296,400   294,788   246,152   6,712   1,267,419 

Senior Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer,
Assistant Secretary

  2017   411,000   8,899   266,220   280,621   177,984   6,612   1,151,336 
  2016   200,000   —     —     978,489   93,200   606   1,272,295 
        
        

Mark W. Salyer(6)

  2018   138,838   —     296,400   294,788   —     251,882   984,897 

Former Senior Vice
President and Chief
Commercial Officer

  2017   141,458   128,250   —     1,627,659   —     61,841   1,959,208 
        
        

Name and Principal Position

 Fiscal
Year
  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)(2)
  Stock
Awards
($)(3)
  Option
Awards
($)(4)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(5)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
  Total
($)
 

Karim Mikhail

  2021   672,747   50,000   3,099,291   1,546,456   430,000   36,059   5,834,553 

President and Chief Executive Officer(1)

        

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

  2021   562,608   —     1,462,784   1,084,166   258,000   7,012   3,374,570 

President of Research and Development, Senior Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer

  2020   525,975   —     2,396,186   1,283,786   225,250   6,912   4,438,109 
  2019   480,083   —     1,487,934   697,694   350,905   6,712   3,023,328 

Michael W. Kalb

  2021   473,933   —     1,765,147   765,949   204,930   7,012   3,216,971 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary

  2020   458,275   —     2,396,186   1,283,786   191,475   6,912   4,336,634 
  2019   438,058   —     1,487,934   697,694   227,832   6,712   2,858,230 

Aaron D. Berg

  2021   505,100   —     1,462,781   1,084,166   233,406   7,012   3,292,468 

Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

  2020   458,275   —     2,396,186   1,283,786   190,900   6,912   4,336,059 
  2019   438,058   —     1,487,934   697,694   228,820   6,712   2,859,218 

Jason Marks

  2021   173,766   207,219   1,086,000   423,522   —     1,811   1,892,318 

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary(7)

        

John F. Thero

  2021   670,923   —     5,353,429   3,067,754   536,738   6,810   9,635,654 

Former President and Chief Executive Officer(8)

  2020   810,000   —     11,882,188   4,665,531   551,040   6,912   17,915,671 
  2019   697,067   —     3,645,607   3,944,907   635,250   6,712   8,929,543 

Joseph T. Kennedy

  2021   443,645   —     1,160,421   765,949   216,824   6,503   2,593,342 

Former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives, Secretary(9)

  2020   525,975   —     2,396,186   1,283,786   229,888   6,912   4,442,747 
  2019   480,083   60,000   1,487,934   697,694   250,905   6,712   2,983,328 

 

(1)

Mr. Mikhail was promoted to, and began serving as, our President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2021, and did not serve as our executive officer during fiscal years 2020 and 2019. Accordingly, his compensation with respect to fiscal years 2020 and 2019 are not included. In addition to serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mikhail serves as a member of our board of directors, but receives no additional compensation for his service in such role.

(2)

The amounts reported in the “Bonus” column for 20172021 and 20162019 for Mr. Mikhail and Mr. Kennedy, respectively, consist of discretionary cash bonuses awarded under the MICP for significant achievements during 2021 and exceptional performance in 2017 or 2016,2019, respectively. In addition, theThe amount reported in the “Bonus” column for 20172021 for Mr. Salyer includes asign-onMarks consists of the bonus of $60,000 and an annual cash bonus of $65,000, each paid pursuant to the terms ofagreed upon in his employment agreement with the Company.Company that he entered into when he joined the Company in August 2021.

(2)(3)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of time- and performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards granted in each year calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting. For performance-basedperformance- based restricted stock units, the value reported reflects the value of the award at the grant date based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. For the performance-based restricted stock units granted to Mr. Thero in 2018, as achievement of the performance criteria was deemed not probable on the grant date, the grant date fair value of such award included in the table is $0. The value of Mr. Thero’s 2018 performance-based restricted stock units, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved, is $3,559,900. For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2017, as achievement of the performance criteria was deemed not probable on the grant date,2021, the grant date fair value of each such award included in the table for each was $0. The valueassuming the probable outcome of the 2017 performance-based restricted stock units, assuming thatperformance conditions (which is assumed to be the highestmaximum level of performance conditions will be achieved,achievement) is $795,600$1,671,000 for Mr. Kennedy and $673,200Mikhail, $439,622 for each of Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb, Mr. Berg and Mr. Kalb.Kennedy, $543,000 for Mr. Marks and $2,465,706 for Mr. Thero. For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2020, the grant date fair value of each such award included in the table assuming the probable outcome of the performance conditions (which is assumed to be the maximum level of achievement) is $9,014,778 for Mr. Thero and $1,607,286 for each of Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb, Mr. Berg and Mr. Kennedy. For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2019, the grant date fair value of each such award included in the table assuming the probable outcome of the performance conditions (which is assumed to be the maximum level of achievement) is $843,500 for each of Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb, Mr. Berg and Mr. Kennedy. Assumptions used in the calculations for these amounts are set forth in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onthe Original Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019.Filing.

(3)(4)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based stock option awards granted in each year and calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculations for these amounts are set forth in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onthe Original Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019.Filing.

(4)(5)

This column reflects payments made under the MICP and special incentive bonus programs in respect of the year earned. See the discussion regarding annual and special incentive compensation in “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding the performance measures.

(5)

Mr. Kalb joined the Company on June 30, 2016. His annualized base salary for 2016 was $400,000.

(6)

Mr. Salyer joined the Company on September 11, 2017. His employment with the Company terminated on April 18, 2018. His annualized base salary for 2017 was $455,000. His annualized base salary for 2018 was $459,000.

(7)

The amounts included in this column represent company-paid match of 401(k)/pension contributions and life insurance premiums unless otherwise noted. The amount reported in 2018 for premiums.

(7)

Mr. Salyer includes the following severance payments, which were paid to him in connection with the termination of his employment pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with the Company: (i) $229,500 for six months of base salary continuation, (ii) $10,592 for accrued paid time off, and (iii) $8,397 forMarks joined the Company portionin August 2021 as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary and was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary in April 2022.

(8)

Mr. Thero resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer, and a member of the COBRA premiumsboard of directors, of the Company, effective August 1, 2021, and provided transitional services through October 31, 2021. Mr. Thero received no additional compensation for six months following termination. In addition,his service as a member of our board of directors.

(9)

Mr. Kennedy resigned as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Strategic Initiatives and Secretary of the vesting of Mr. Salyer’s equity awards subject to time-based vesting was accelerated by six months upon the termination of his employment pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. The amount reported for 2017 for Mr. Salyer includes $61,538 of relocation costs paid pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with the Company.Company, effective August 1, 2021, and provided transitional services through October 31, 2021.

Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table

The amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table, including base salary, stock awards, option awards, and payments made under the MICP, are described more fully under “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based option awards to the named executive officers during fiscal year 2018:2021:

 

Name

  Grant Date   All Other Option
Awards:
Number of Securities
Underlying Options (#)
  Exercise
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Option
Awards ($)(1)
 

John F. Thero

   2/1/2018    558,000(2)   3.80    1,405,914 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   2/1/2018    117,000(2)   3.80    294,788 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   2/1/2018    117,000(2)   3.80    294,788 

Michael W. Kalb

   2/1/2018    117,000(2)   3.80    294,788 

Mark W. Salyer(3)

   2/1/2018    117,000(2)   3.80    294,788 

Name

  Grant Date   All Other Option
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
  Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Option
Awards ($)(1)
 

Karim Mikhail

   1/4/2021    46,000   5.03    182,086 
   4/12/2021    290,200(2)(2)   4.97    1,364,370 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   1/4/2021    193,500   5.03    765,949 
   8/2/2021    96,750(2)(2)   4.22    318,217 

Name

  Grant
Date
   All Other Option
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
  Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Option
Awards ($)(1)
 

Michael W. Kalb

   1/4/2021    193,500(2)   5.03    765,949 

Aaron D. Berg

   1/4/2021    193,500   5.03    765,949 
   8/2/2021    96,750(2)(2)   4.22    318,217 

Jason Marks

   9/1/2021    100,000(3)   5.43    423,522 

John F. Thero

   1/4/2021    775,000(2)   5.03    3,067,754 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   1/4/2021    193,500(2)   5.03    765,949 

 

(1)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted in 2018,2021, and is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculations for these amounts are set forth in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onthe Original Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019.Filing.

(2)

These options vest monthly over 48 months beginningfour years, with 25% vesting on February 28, 2018.the first anniversary of the grant date and the balance vesting ratably over the subsequent 12 calendar quarters.

(3)

Mr. Salyer’s employmentThese options vest over four years, with 25% vesting on August 19, 2022 and the Company terminated in April 2018. As ofbalance vesting ratably over the termination date, options to purchase 19,502 shares with a total grant date fair value of $49,136 had vested and all remaining unvested options were immediately forfeited.subsequent 12 calendar quarters.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based restricted stock unit awards subject to time-based vesting to the named executive officers during fiscal year 2018:2021:

 

Name

  Grant Date   All Other Stock
Awards:
Number of Shares
of Stock or
Units (#)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards ($)(1)
 

John F. Thero

   2/1/2018    371,000(2)   1,409,800 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   2/1/2018    78,000(2)   296,400 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   2/1/2018    78,000(2)   296,400 

Michael W. Kalb

   2/1/2018    78,000(2)   296,400 

Mark W. Salyer

   2/1/2018    78,000(2)   296,400 

Name

  Grant Date   All Other Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock
or Units (#)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards ($)(1)
 

Karim Mikhail

   1/4/2021    34,100   171,523 
   4/12/2021    215,200(2)(3)   1,256,768 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   1/4/2021    143,300   720,799 
   8/2/2021    71,650(2)(4)   302,363 

Michael W. Kalb

   1/4/2021    143,300   720,799 
   8/2/2021    143,300(2)(4)   604,726 

Aaron D. Berg

   1/4/2021    143,300   720,799 
   8/2/2021    71,650(2)(4)   302,363 

Jason Marks

   9/1/2021    100,000(5)   543,000 

John F. Thero

   1/4/2021    574,100(2)   2,887,723 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   1/4/2021    143,300(2)   720,799 

 

(1)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based restricted stock unit awards granted in 2018,2021, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculations for these amounts are set forth in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onthe Original Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019.Filing.

(2)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in three equal annual installments on each of JanuaryDecember 31, 2019, January2021, December 31, 20202022 and JanuaryDecember 31, 2021.2023.

(3)

Mr. Salyer’s employment with the Company terminated in April 2018, at which time the entireThese restricted stock unit award was immediately forfeited.awards vest in three equal annual installments on each of April 12, 2022, April 12, 2023 and April 12, 2024.

(4)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in three equal annual installments on each of July 31, 2022, July 31, 2023 and July 31, 2024.

(5)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in three equal annual installments on each of August 19, 2022, August 19, 2023 and August 19, 2024.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based restricted stock unit awards subject to performance-based vesting to the named executive officers during fiscal year 2018:2021:

 

Name

      Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
     Grant Date   Estimated
Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards Target
(#)(1)
 Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock Awards
($)(2)
 
Grant Date   Target (#)(1) Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards ($)(2)
 

Karim Mikhail

   1/4/2021    100,000   503,000 
   4/12/2021    200,000(3)   1,168,000 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   1/4/2021    87,400(3)   439,622 

Michael W. Kalb

   1/4/2021    87,400(3)   439,622 

Aaron D. Berg

   1/4/2021    87,400(3)   439,622 

Jason Marks

   9/1/2021    100,000(3)   543,000 

John F. Thero

   3/12/2018    970,000(3)  3,559,900    1/4/2021    490,200(3)   2,465,706 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   —      —     —      1/4/2021    87,400(3)   439,622 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   —      —     —   

Michael W. Kalb

   —      —     —   

Mark W. Salyer

   —      —     —   

 

(1)

There is no threshold for these awards and the target equates to the maximum.

(2)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718 assuming the probable outcome of the performance conditionscondition on the grant date, which was assumed to be maximum achievement of such conditions.condition.

(3)

This amount represents restricted stock unit awards that vest and are earned only if both of the following performance goalspre-defined sales and operational milestones are achieved by December 31, 2027: (i) a successful outcome of theREDUCE-IT study and(ii) pre-defined commercial sales milestones.2027. To date, only the successful outcome of theREDUCE-ITpre-defined study hassales and operational milestones have not been achieved soand, as a result, none of the restricted stock units have vested.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants ofnon-equity incentive plan-based awards to the named executive officers during fiscal year 2018:2021:

 

Name

      Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards ($)
   Grant
Date
   Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)
 
Grant Date   Target(1)   Maximum(1)  Target(1) Maximum(1) 

Karim Mikhail

   —      525,000(1)   525,000(1) 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   —      300,000(1)   300,000(1) 

Michael W. Kalb

   —      237,600(1)   237,600(1) 

Aaron D. Berg

   —      275,000(1)   275,000(1) 

Jason Marks

   —      87,466(2)   87,466(2) 

John F. Thero

   —      498,600    1,246,500    —      675,680(3)   675,680(3) 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   —      208,035    442,074    —      272,950(3)   272,950(3) 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   —      184,920    392,955 

Michael W. Kalb

   —      169,760    360,740 

Mark W. Salyer(2)

   —      183,600    390,150 

 

(1)

The amounts in the “Target” and “Maximum” columns reflect the potential payouts under the 20182021 MICP. The amounts in the “Maximum” column represent the amounts that could be earned if all corporate performance, individual performance and pre-defined stretch goals under the 2021 MICP are achieved. Actual bonuses awarded to the individuals were based on achievement of objectives, as discussed in the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above.section.

(2)

Mr. Salyer’s employment withRepresents potential payouts under the Company terminated2021 MICP as described in April 2018 and therefore(1) above, pro-rated for the amount of time he was not eligiblean employee in 2021.

(3)

Represents potential payouts under the 2021 MICP as described in (1) above. Pursuant to receiveand conditioned upon compliance with Mr. Thero’s and Mr. Kennedy’s separation agreements, each of Mr. Thero’s and Mr. Kennedy’s actual bonus was calculated on a cash incentive bonus for 2018.pro-rata basis based on their 2021 service.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired by the named executive officers upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units in fiscal year 20182021 as well as the value realized upon exercise or vesting. The value realized represents the aggregate difference between the fair market value of shares on the dates of exercise or vesting and the exercise prices, if any, multiplied by the number of shares acquired upon exercise or vesting, prior to payment of any applicable withholding taxes.

 

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
   Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
 

John F. Thero

   407,611    7,223,410    1,914,917    6,992,224 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   1,149,625    10,130,754    536,854    2,962,941 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   1,518,551    9,093,787    316,104    1,033,770 

Michael W. Kalb

   150,000    1,234,245    29,000    108,750 

Mark W. Salyer

   189,584    1,689,193    —      —   

Name

  Option Awards   Stock Awards 
  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
   Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

Karim Mikhail

   —      —      44,701    184,082 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   470,595    2,528,885    237,276    1,456,803 

Michael W. Kalb

   120,000    348,440    237,276    1,456,803 

Aaron D. Berg

   —      —      237,276    1,394,143 

Jason Marks

   —      —      —      —   

John F. Thero

   —      —      1,039,209    6,460,352 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   —      —      261,718    1,619,740 

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table shows information regarding outstanding stock option awards at December 31, 20182021 for our named executive officers:

 

  Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
($/Sh)
   Option
Expiration
Date
 

Name

  Exercisable
(#)
   Unexercisable
(#)
   Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
($/Sh)
   Option
Expiration
Date
 

John F. Thero

   750,000    —    3.40    11/10/2020 
   83,230    —    8.86    2/1/2022 
   52,500    —    8.10    1/2/2023 
   607,500    —    2.04    1/8/2024 
   391,667    8,333(1)  1.02    2/2/2025 
   524,993    75,007(2)  2.50    7/6/2025 
   350,002    49,998(3)  2.50    7/6/2025 
   350,002    49,998(3)  2.50    7/6/2025 
   401,044    148,956(4)  1.40    2/1/2026 
   263,542    286,458(5)  2.95    2/1/2027 
   127,875    430,125(6)  3.80    2/1/2028 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   600,000    —    6.35    12/16/2021 
   62,500    —    8.86    2/1/2022 
   33,750    —    8.10    1/2/2023 
   1,953    1,953(1)  1.02    2/2/2025 
   18,750    112,511(2)  2.50    7/6/2025 

Name

Exercisable
(#)
   Unexercisable
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($/Sh)
   Option
Expiration
Date
 
   31,250    68,750(1) 
   2,604    33,854(4)  1.40    2/1/2026    —      46,000(2)   5.03    1/4/2031 
   79,063    85,937(5)  2.95    2/1/2027    —      290,200(3)   4.97    4/12/2031 
   26,813    90,187(6)  3.80    2/1/2028 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   23,436    1,953(1)  1.02    2/2/2025    29,250    2,437(4)   3.80    2/1/2028 
   —      24,998(2)  2.50    7/6/2025    36,782    16,718(5)   16.87    2/1/2029 
   30,438    22,500(3)  2.50    7/6/2025    42,219    54,281(6)   18.39    2/3/2030 
   —      22,500(3)  2.50    7/6/2025    —      193,500(2)   5.03    1/4/2031 
   209,999    30,001(7)  2.50    7/6/2025    —      96,750(7)   4.22    8/2/2031 
   —      33,854(4)  1.40    2/1/2026 
   500    69,270(5)  2.95    2/1/2027 
   26,813    90,187(6)  3.80    2/1/2028 

Michael W. Kalb

   240,626    234,374(8)  2.19    7/1/2026    55,000    —     2.19    7/1/2026 
   63,730    69,270(5)  2.95    2/1/2027    39,000    —     2.95    2/1/2027 
   26,813    90,187(6)  3.80    2/1/2028    83,563    2,437(4)   3.80    2/1/2028 

Mark W. Salyer

   19,502    —  (9)  3.49    4/18/2019 
   36,782    16,718(5)   16.87    2/1/2029 
   42,219    54,281(6)   18.39    2/3/2030 
   —      193,500(2)   5.03    1/4/2031 

Aaron D. Berg

   3,906    —     1.02    2/2/2025 
   49,998    —     2.50    7/6/2025 
   36,458    —     1.40    2/1/2026 
   69,270    —     2.95    2/1/2027 
   75,555    12,185   2.80    5/1/2028 
   36,782    16,718(5)   16.87    2/1/2029 
   42,219    54,281(6)   18.39    2/3/2030 
   —      193,500(2)   5.03    1/4/2031 
   —      96,750(7)   4.22    8/2/2031 

Name

  Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
($/Sh)
   Option
Expiration
Date
 
  Exercisable
(#)
   Unexercisable
(#)
 

Jason Marks

   —      100,000(8)   5.43    9/1/2031 

John F. Thero(9)

   83,230    —     8.86    2/1/2022 
   52,500    —     8.10    1/2/2023 
   558,475    —     2.04    1/8/2024 
   293,628    —     1.02    2/2/2025 
   600,000    —     2.50    7/6/2025 
   400,000    —     2.50    7/6/2025 
   363,400    —     2.50    7/6/2025 
   550,000    —     1.40    2/1/2026 
   550,000    —     2.95    2/1/2027 
   546,375    11,625(4)   3.80    2/1/2028 
   207,969    94,531(5)   16.87    2/1/2029 
   153,432    197,268(6)   18.39    2/3/2030 
   —      775,000(2)   5.03    1/4/2031 

Joseph T. Kennedy(10)

   18,228    —     1.40    2/1/2026 
   65,310    —     2.95    2/1/2027 
   73,123    2,437(4)   3.80    2/1/2028 
   36,782    16,718(5)   16.87    2/1/2029 
   42,219    54,281(6)   18.39    2/3/2030 
   —      193,500(2)   5.03    1/4/2031 

 

(1)

TheTwenty-five percent (25%) of the shares underlying thesethis stock optionsoption vested on July 1, 2021, and the remaining 75% of the shares underlying this option vest monthlyratably over 48 months beginning February 28, 2015.the next 12 quarters.

(2)

TheTwenty-five percent (25%) of the shares underlying thesethis stock optionsoption vested on January 4, 2022, and the remaining 75% of the shares underlying this option vest monthlyratably over 48 months beginning July 31, 2015.the next 12 quarters.

(3)

TheTwenty-five percent (25%) of the shares underlying thesethis stock options vest monthly over 48 months beginningoption vested on July 31, 2015,April 12, 2022, and relate to grants with certain financial and clinical performance milestones that were achieved during fiscal year 2016 and 2017. Upon achievementthe remaining 75% of the milestones,shares underlying this option vest ratably over the options that had vested monthly without regard to the requirement for achievement of the milestones and had been previously deferred until achievement became exercisable. Such grants will continue to vest monthly until fully vested.next 12 quarters.

(4)

The shares underlying these stock options vest monthly over 48 months beginning February 28, 2016.2018.

(5)

The shares underlying these stock options vest monthlyquarterly over 48 months16 quarters beginning February 28, 2017.May 15, 2019.

(6)

The shares underlying these stock options vest monthlyquarterly over 48 months16 quarters beginning February 28, 2018.April 30, 2020.

(7)

TheTwenty-five percent (25%) of the shares underlying this stock option vest monthly over 48 months beginning on July 31, 2015, but were deferred untilAugust 2, 2022, and the achievementremaining 75% of certain clinical performance milestones, which occurred in September

2018 upon positiveREDUCE-IT results. Upon the achievement of the milestone, the shares underlying this option vest ratably over the options vested to the extent they would have vested on a monthly basis without regard to the requirement for achievement of the performance criteria and will continue to vest monthly thereafter.next 12 quarters.

(8)

Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares underlying this stock option vestedvest on June 30, 2017,August 19, 2022, and the remaining 75% of the optionsshares underlying this option vest ratably over the next 36 months.12 quarters.

(9)

Mr. Salyer’s employmentThero’s stock options stopped vesting at the conclusion of his consultancy period with the Company terminated in April 2018, at which time the vesting of all unvestedon February 28, 2022.

(10)

Mr. Kennedy’s stock options subject to time-basedstopped vesting was accelerated by six months pursuant toat the termsconclusion of his employment agreementconsultancy period with the Company and any remaining unvested stock options were immediately forfeited. Any remaining vested but unexercised options expire upon theone-year anniversary of his termination date.on March 31, 2022.

The following table shows information regarding outstanding restricted stock unit awards at December 31, 2018,2021, for our named executive officers:

 

Name

  Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
(#)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
($)(1)
   Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested ($)(1)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)(1)
 

John F. Thero

   75,000(2)  1,020,750    —     —   
   120,000(3)  1,633,200    —     —   
   239,333(4)  3,257,322    —     —   
   371,000(5)  5,049,310    —     —   
   —     —      1,265,250(6)  17,220,053 
   —     —      970,000(7)  13,201,700 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   94,374(2)  1,284,430    —     —   

Karim Mikhail

   66,666(2)   224,664    —     —   
   12,500(8)  170,125    —     —      22,733(3)   76,610    —     —   
   26,666(3)  362,924    —     —      215,200(4)   725,224    —     —   
   72,000(4)  979,920    —     —      —     —      100,000(5)   337,000 
   78,000(5)  1,061,580    —     —      —     —      100,000(5)   337,000 
   —     —      199,500(6)  2,715,195    —     —      200,000(5)   674,000 
   —     —      260,000(7)  3,538,600 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   26,666(3)  362,924    —     —      12,733(6)   42,910    —     —   
   58,000(4)  789,380    —     —      32,666(7)   110,084    —     —   
   78,000(5)  1,061,580    —     —      95,533(3)   321,946    —     —   
   —     —      199,500(6)  2,715,195    71,650(8)   241,461    —     —   
   —     —      220,000(7)  2,994,200    —     —      50,000(5)   168,500 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 

Michael W. Kalb

   58,000(4)  789,380    —     —      12,733(5)   42,910    —     —   
   78,000(5)  1,061,580    —     —      32,666(6)   110,084    —     —   
   —     —      220,000(7)  2,994,200    95,533(3)   321,946    —     —   

Mark W. Salyer(9)

   —     —      —     —   
   143,300(8)   482,921    —     —   
   —     —      50,000(5)   168,500 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 

Aaron D. Berg

   12,733(5)   42,910    —     —   
   32,666(6)   110,084    —     —   
   95,533(3)   321,946    —     —   
   71,650(8)   241,461    —     —   
   —     —      50,000(5)   168,500 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 

Jason Marks

   100,000(9)   337,000    —     —   
   —     —      100,000(5)   337,000 

John F. Thero(10)

   72,033(5)   242,751    —     —   
   118,733(6)   400,130    —     —   
   382,733(3)   1,289,810    —     —   
   —     —      490,200(5)   1,651,974 
   —     —      490,200(5)   1,651,974 

Joseph T. Kennedy(11)

   12,733(5)   42,910    —     —   
   32,666(6)   110,084    —     —   
   95,533(3)   321,946    —     —   
   —     —      50,000(5)   168,500 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 
   —     —      87,400(5)   294,538 

 

(1)

The market value of the restricted stock unit awards represents the product of the closing price of Amarinour stock as of December 31, 2018,2021, the last trading day of the year, which was $13.61,$3.37, and the number of shares

underlying each such award and, with respect to performance-based awards, assumes satisfaction of the applicable performance criteria.

(2)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in 16 equal quarterlyannual installments over three years, commencing September 30, 2015.July 1, 2021. Amount unvested at December 31, 20182021 represents the remaining two vesting tranches.

(3)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in equal annual installments over three years, commencing JanuaryDecember 31, 2017.2021. Amount unvested at December 31, 20182021 represents the third and finalremaining two vesting tranche.tranches.

(4)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in equal annual installments over three years, commencing January 31, 2018. Amount unvested at December 31, 2018 represents the remaining two vesting tranches.April 12, 2022.

(5)

These restricted stock unit awards vest upon achievement of certain sales and operational performance goals. To date, the specified criterion has not been achieved.

(6)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in equal annual installments over three years, commencing January 31, 2019.

(6)

These restricted stock unit awards vest upon achievement of a certain financial performance goal. To date,2020. Amount unvested at December 31, 2021 represents the specified criteria have not been achieved.third and final tranche.

(7)

These restricted stock unit awards vest ratably in 36 equal monthlyannual installments over three years, commencing September 30, 2018, but are deferred unless and until, and are subject to the achievement of, certain financial and clinical performance milestones, such that upon the achievement of the clinical milestone together with each individual financial milestone, the shares underlying the restricted stock units awards for the related grant shall be vested to the extent they would have vested on a monthly basis without regard to the requirement for achievement of the performance criteria and will continue to vest monthly thereafter. To date, only the clinical performance goal has been achieved, such that no awards have vested.

(8)

This restricted stock unit award vests in 16 equal quarterly installments on the last day of each quarter, commencing upon achievement of certain legal performance criteria in October 2015.February 28, 2021. Amount unvested at December 31, 20172021 represents the remaining two vesting tranches.

(9)(8)

Mr. Salyer’s employment with the Company terminated in April 2018, at which time all unvestedThese restricted stock unit awards were immediately forfeited.vest in equal annual installments over three years, commencing July 31, 2022.

(9)

These restricted stock unit awards vest in equal annual installments over three years, commencing August 19, 2022.

(10)

Mr. Thero’s restricted stock unit awards stopped vesting at the conclusion of his consultancy period with the Company on February 28, 2022.

(11)

Mr. Kennedy’s restricted stock unit awards stopped vesting at the conclusion of his consultancy period with the Company on March 31, 2022.

Pension Benefits

We do not have a defined benefit plan. Our named executive officers did not participate in, or otherwise receive any special benefits under, any pension or defined benefit retirement plan sponsored by us during fiscal year 2018.2021.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

During fiscal year 2018,2021, our named executive officers did not contribute to, or earn any amount with respect to, any defined contribution or other plan sponsored by us that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is nottax-qualified.

Employment, Change of Control and Severance Arrangements

We have entered into employment agreements or arrangements with each of our named executive officers. These agreements set forth the individual’s base salary, bonus compensation, equity compensation and other employee benefits, which are described above in the “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis”. In addition, theseOur agreements with Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb and Mr. Berg provide for severance payments and benefits upon a termination of employment under certain circumstances (we refer to these severance and benefits in this Amendment as the “Legacy Arrangements”). However, in January 2021, we adopted our Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”), pursuant to which our U.S. officers with a title of vice president and higher (at the time of termination) are eligible for certain severance benefits. Under the Executive Severance Plan, if a named executive officer’s Legacy Arrangement contains a more favorable definition of a defined term in the Executive Severance Plan or provides for more favorable terms or provisions than provided under the Executive Severance Plan, then the more favorable definition, term or provision, or relevant combination thereof, will be applicable for the benefit of the Eligible Executive, except that in no event will there be duplication of payments or benefits under the Executive Severance Plan and the named executive officer’s Legacy Arrangement. The benefits provided to our named executive officers under the Executive Severance Plan or the applicable Legacy Arrangements are described below.

John F. Thero

In

Pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan, in the event that Mr. Thero’sof a termination of a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Companyus without cause or he resignsby a named executive officer for good reason, hein each case, during the 24-month period following a change of control and subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement including, among other things, a general release of claims in favor of Amarin, our named executive officers are eligible for the following severance payments and benefits under the Executive Severance Plan:

Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb, Mr. Berg and Mr. Marks will be entitled to a lump sum cash payment equal to 1.5 times the sum of such named executive officer’s base salary plus such named executive officer’s target annual performance bonus for the year in which termination occurs or, if higher, the target annual performance bonus in effect as of immediately prior to the change of control (the higher of such amounts, the “Target Bonus”), continuation of group health plan benefits for up to 18 months and accelerated vesting of all of such named executive officer’s then-outstanding stock options, restricted stock units or other equity incentive awards (whether or not subject to time- based vesting) (the “Outstanding Equity Awards”); and

Mr. Mikhail will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of his base salary for twelve (12) months;24 months, a lump sum cash payment equal to 2.0 times his Target Bonus, continuation of group health plan benefits for up to twelve (12)24 months to the extent authorized by and consistent with 29 U.S.C. § 1161 et seq. (commonly known as “COBRA”) with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Thero as in effect on the date of termination; and twelve (12) months of accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awards toof his Outstanding Equity Awards.

Under the extent subject to time-based vesting. In lieu ofExecutive Severance Plan, in the foregoing, if Mr. Thero’sevent that a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Companyus without cause or he resigns(or, to the extent a named executive officer’s employment agreement provides good reason protection outside of a change of control, if the participant terminates employment for good reason, in either case, within twenty-four (24) monthsreason) outside the 24-month period following a change of control, heand subject to the execution and effectiveness of a separation agreement, our named executive officers are eligible for the following severance payments and benefits under the Executive Severance Plan:

Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb, Mr. Berg and Mr. Marks will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of such named executive officer’s base salary for eighteen (18) months;12 months, continuation of group health plan benefits for up to eighteen (18)12 months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the costsix months of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Thero as in effect on the date of termination; a lump sum cash payment equal to the full target annual performance bonus for the year during which the termination occurred; and 100% acceleration ofaccelerated vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awards.such named executive officer’s Outstanding Equity Awards; and

Joseph T. Kennedy

In the event that Mr. Kennedy’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause, heMikhail will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of his base salary for six (6) months;18 months, an amount equal to 1.5 times his Target Bonus to be paid in substantially equal installments over the course of 18 months, continuation of group health plan benefits for up to six (6)18 months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Kennedy as in effect on the date of termination; and six (6)12 months of accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awardshis Outstanding Equity Awards.

Pursuant to his transitional services and separation agreement, Mr. Thero’s separation was voluntary, and he was therefore not eligible for any severance pay, benefits or accelerated vesting under his employment agreement or the Executive Severance Plan. Mr. Thero was eligible for a 2021 annual bonus, calculated on a pro rata basis based on his 2021 service and subject to the extentachievement of Amarin’s Board-approved corporate goals on a basis consistent with the then-active officers of Amarin.

Pursuant to his transitional services and separation agreement, Mr. Kennedy’s separation was voluntary, and he was therefore not eligible for any severance pay, benefits or accelerated vesting under his employment agreement or the Executive Severance Plan. Mr. Kennedy was eligible for a 2021 annual bonus, calculated on a pro rata basis based on his 2021 service and subject to time-based vesting. In lieuthe achievement of the foregoing, if Mr. Kennedy’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or he resigns for good reason, in either case, within twenty-four (24) months following a change of control, then he will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of base salary for twelve (12) months; continuation of group health plan benefits for up to twelve (12) months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Kennedy as in effect on the date of termination; a lump sum cash payment equal to the full target annual performance bonus for the year during which the termination occurred; and 100% acceleration of vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awards.

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

In the event that Dr. Ketchum’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause, he will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of base salary for six (6) months; continuation of group health plan benefits for up to six (6) months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Dr. Ketchum as in effect on the date of termination; and six (6) months of accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awards to the extent subject to time-based vesting. In lieu of the foregoing, if Dr. Ketchum’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or he resigns for good reason, in either case, within twenty-four (24) months following a change of control, then he will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of base salary for twelve (12) months; continuation of group health plan benefits for up to twelve (12) months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Dr. Ketchum as in effect on the date of termination; a lump sum cash payment equal to the full target annual performance bonus for the year during which the termination occurred; and 100% acceleration of vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awards.

Michael W. Kalb

In the event that Mr. Kalb’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause, he will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of base salary for six (6) months; continuation of group health plan benefits for up to six (6) months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Kalb as in effect on the date of termination; and six (6) months of accelerated vesting on all outstanding equity incentive awards to the extent subject to time-based vesting. In lieu of the foregoing, in the event that Mr. Kalb is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, in either case, within twenty-four (24) months following a change of control, he will be entitled to severance as follows: continuation of base salary for twelve (12) months; continuation of group health plan benefits for up to twelve (12) months to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Kalb as in effect on the date of termination; a lump sum cash payment equal to the full target annual performance bonus for the year during which the termination occurred; and 100% acceleration of vesting on all outstanding equity incentive awards.

Mark W. Salyer

On April 18, 2018, Mr. Salyer’s employment relationship with the Company terminated. In connection with the termination of his employment, Mr. Salyer received the following severance payments and benefits pursuantAmarin’s Board approved corporate goals.

to the terms of his employment agreement: continuation of base salary for six (6) months; continuation of group health plan benefits for six (6) months, with the cost of the regular premium for such benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Mr. Salyer as in effect on the date of termination; and six (6) months of accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity incentive awards to the extent subject to time-based vesting. Severance amounts actually paid to Mr. Salyer in connection with the termination of his employment are set forth in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table above.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The table below shows the benefits potentially payable to each of our named executive officers assuming the named executive officer’s employment was terminated without cause by the Company or for good reason within twenty-four (24)24 months following a change of control and such termination occurred on December 31, 2018,2021, the last business day of fiscal year 2018.2021.

 

Name

  Base Salary
($)
   Bonus
Payment
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Options(1)
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
RSUs(2)
($)
   Continuation of
Health Benefits
($)
   Total ($)   Base
Salary ($)
   Bonus
Payment
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Options (1)
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units (2)
($)
   Continuation
of Health
Benefits
($)
   Total
($)
 

Karim Mikhail

   1,500,000    1,050,000    —      2,374,499    18,000    4,942,499 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   900,000    450,000    —      1,473,977    51,000    2,874,977 

Michael W. Kalb

   712,800    356,400    —      1,715,438    51,000    2,835,638 

Aaron D. Berg

   825,000    412,500    6,945    1,473,977    52,000    2,770,422 

Jason Marks

   712,500    356,250    —      674,000    52,000    1,794,750 

John F. Thero

   997,200    498,600    11,141,117    41,382,335    27,500    54,046,752    —      536,738    —      5,236,640    —      5,773,378 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   462,300    208,035    3,488,766    10,112,774    27,000    14,298,875    —      216,824    —      1,232,517    —      1,449,341 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   462,300    184,920    3,172,087    7,923,279    27,000    11,769,586 

Michael W. Kalb

   424,400    169,760    4,299,704    4,845,160    27,000    9,766,024 

Mark W. Salyer(3)

   —      —      —      —      —      —   

 

(1)

The value of the accelerated vesting of options equals the difference (if positive) between the option exercise price and the closing price per share of our ADSs on December 31, 20182021 ($13.61)3.37), multiplied by the number of shares that would have been accelerated upon a termination occurring on December 31, 2018.2021.

(2)

The value of the accelerated vesting of restricted stock units equals the closing price per share of our ADSs on December 31, 20182021 ($13.61)3.37) multiplied by the number of restricted stock units that would have been accelerated upon a termination occurring on December 31, 2018.2021. Included in these amounts are amounts related to performance-based restricted stock units that would vest upon a change in control of $30,421,753$1,348,000 for Mr. Thero, $6,253,795Mikhail, $757,576 for each of Dr. Ketchum, Mr. Kalb, Mr. Berg, and Mr. Kennedy, $337,000 for Mr. Kennedy, $5,709,395Marks, and $3,303,948 for Mr. Ketchum, and $2,994,200 for Mr. Kalb.

(3)

Mr. Salyer’s employment with the Company terminated in April 2018 and was therefore ineligible to receive severance payments as of December 31, 2018. The amounts actually paid to Mr. Salyer in connection with the termination of his employment are set forth in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table above.Thero.

The table below shows the benefits potentially payable to each of our named executive officers assuming the named executive officer’s employment was terminated by the Company without cause (and, in the case of Mr. Thero, he resigned for good reason) other than within twenty-four (24)24 months following change of control and assuming such termination occurred on December 31, 2018,2021, the last business day of fiscal year 2018.2021.

 

Name

  Base Salary
($)
   Bonus
Payment
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Options(1)
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Time-Based
RSUs(2)
($)
   Continuation of
Health Benefits
($)
   Total ($)   Base
Salary
($)
   Bonus
Payment
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Options (1)
($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stoc Units (2)
($)
   Continuation
of Health
Benefits
($)
   Total ($) 

Karim Mikhail

   1,125,000    787,500    —      392,383    14,000    2,318,883 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   600,000    —      —      97,952    34,000    731,952 

Michael W. Kalb

   475,200    —      —      97,952    34,000    607,152 

Aaron D. Berg

   550,000    —      6,945    97,952    35,000    689,897 

Jason Marks

   475,000    —      —      —      35,000    510,000 

John F. Thero

   664,800    —      6,562,410    5,965,726    18,500    13,211,436    —      536,738    —      442,818    —      979,556 

Joseph T. Kennedy

   231,150    —      1,828,754    2,661,299    13,500    4,734,703    —      216,824    —      97,952    —      314,776 

Steven B. Ketchum, Ph.D.

   231,150    —      1,647,084    1,111,474    13,500    3,003,208 

Michael W. Kalb

   212,200    —      1,212,901    748,550    13,500    2,187,151 

Mark W. Salyer(3)

   —      —      —      —      —      —   

 

(1)

The value of the accelerated vesting of time-based options equals the difference (if positive) between the option exercise price and the closing price per share of our ADSs on December 31, 20182021 ($13.61)3.37), multiplied by the number of shares that would have been accelerated upon termination.

(2)

The value of the accelerated vesting of time-based restricted stock units equals the closing price per share of our ADSs on December 31, 20182021 ($13.61)3.37) multiplied by the number of time-based restricted stock units that would have been accelerated upon termination.

(3)

Mr. Salyer’s employment with the Company terminated in April 2018 and was therefore ineligible to receive severance payments as of December 31, 2018. The amounts actually paid to Mr. Salyer in connection with the termination of his employment are set forth in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table above.

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s total annual compensation to the total annual compensation of the principal executive officer (“PEO”). TheOur PEO is Mr. Karim Mikhail. As he did not serve as PEO for the entirety of our Company is John F. Thero.2021, his compensation was annualized in the same manner as for the median employee as described below.

We believe that our compensation philosophy must be consistent and internally equitable to motivate our employees to create shareholder value. The purpose of the new required disclosure is to provide a measure of pay equity within the organization. We are committed to internal pay equity, and our Remuneration Committee monitors the relationship between the pay our PEO receives and the pay ournon-executive employees receive.

As illustrated in the table below, our 20182021 PEO to median employee pay ratio was approximately 41:42:1.

 

PEO 2018 Compensation

  $4,205,779 

Median Employee 2018 Compensation

  $101,752 

Ratio of PEO to Median Employee Compensation

   41:1 

PEO 2021 Compensation

  $5,911,806 

Median Employee 2021 Compensation

  $139,852 

Ratio of PEO to Median Employee Compensation

   42:1 

We identified the median employee using annualized base salary for 2018,2021, bonus(es) earned in 2018,2021, and aggregate grant date fair values for equity awards granted in 20182021 for all individuals who were employed by us on December 31, 2018,2021, the last day of our fiscal year (whether employed on a full-time,full- time or part-time or seasonal basis). Employees on leave of absence were excluded from the list and reportable wages were annualized for those permanent full-time or part-time employees who were not employed for the full calendar year.

The pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules, based on our internal records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. Accordingly, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

A substantial portion of the compensation included in this analysis is based on estimates. Furthermore, as discussed above, the Black-Scholes option- pricing model is used to estimate the value of option awards. Under the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, historical variable assumptions and other variables can cause model prices to be more or less than the actual value of an option when exercised or in an ultimate exit. Actual option value is instead based on stock performance, which can vary significantly from these historical variable assumption-based valuation estimates. The realized value of the long-term equity awards granted to the Company’s CEO and other employees in the future could be considerably more or less than these historical estimates as the future value of the Company’s ADSs cannot be accurately predicted by the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or by any model.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-Employee Director Compensation

Upon recommendation of the Remuneration Committee, the Board approved an amendeda non-employee director compensation program effective December 10, 2012, as most recently amended on May 20, 2013, and March 11, 2014.in January 2020. The amendednon-employee director compensation program wasis intended to approximate the 50th percentile ofnon-employee director compensation within the Company’s peer group. A summary of thenon-employee director compensation arrangements for fiscal year 20182021 is set forth below.

 

   Retainer ($) 

Annual Board Retainer Fee:

  

Non-Executive Chairman

   95,000 

Allnon-employee directors

   55,00062,500 

Annual Chairman Retainer Fees:*

  

Audit Committee Chairman

   20,00025,000 

Remuneration Committee Chairman

   15,00020,000 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman

   10,00011,000 

Annual Committee Member Retainer Fees:*

  

Audit Committee

   10,00012,000 

Remuneration Committee

   7,50010,000 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

   5,000 

 

*

These fees are in addition to the Annual Board Retainer Fee, as applicable.

The annual retainers are paid in equal installments in arrears within 30 days of the end of each calendar quarter, or upon the earlier resignation or removal of thenon-employee director. Fornon-employee directors who join the Board during the calendar year, annual retainers are prorated based on the number of calendar days served by such director in the calendar year.

Non-employee directors are given an annual election option, which option is to be exercised within ten calendar days of the end of each quarter, of receiving their annual retainers in the form of either (i) cash or (ii) unregisterednon-ADRnon-ADS ordinary shares,Ordinary Shares, with any such issuances to be priced at the greater of (i)(a) the closing price of the Company’s ADSs on NASDAQNasdaq on the date which is ten calendar days after the end of each quarter or (ii)(b) £0.50 per share (i.e., par value per ordinary share)Ordinary Share).

In addition, upon their initial appointment to the Board,non-employee directors receive equity awards with a grant date fair value of $300,000,$540,000, split equally in value between option awards and restricted stock units. The option awards vest in full upon theone-year anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock units are subject to deferred settlement upon the director’s separation of service with the Company (“DSUs”) and vest in equal installments over three years on each anniversary of the date of grant. The grant date for such awards is date of initial appointment, and the exercise price of any option award is equal to the closing market price on NASDAQNasdaq of the ADSs representing the Company’s Ordinary Sharesordinary shares on such date. In addition, for so long as thenon-employee director remains on the Board, thenon-employee director receives annual equity awards with a grant date fair value of $200,000,$360,000, split equally in value between option awards and DSUs. Such option awards vest in full upon the earlier of theone-year anniversary of the date of grant or the annual general meeting of shareholders in such anniversary year. Such DSUs vest in equal annual installments over three years, in each case upon the earlier of the anniversary of the date of grant or the annual general meeting of shareholders in such anniversary year.

In addition, aNon-Executive Chairman of the Board that continues on the Board following the Company’s annual general meeting of shareholders (and who was not first elected to the Board at such meeting) is eligible to

receive an annual equity award with a grant date fair value of $20,000, split equally in value between option awards and DSUs. Such awards have a grant date, vesting schedule and exercise price identical to other annual equity awards.

All equity awards are made pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Equity2020 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and in effect from time to time. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the EquityStock Incentive Plan), all option awards and DSUs shall immediately become fully vested.

Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings.

On MayJune 14, 2018,2021, the Company awarded options representing the right to purchase 46,973 ordinary shares45,953 Ordinary Shares and 31,15336,000 restricted stock units to each of Mr. O’Sullivan, Ms. Peterson, Mr. Stack, Mr. van Heek and Mr. Zakrzewski in connection with their service on the Board. The options vest in full upon the earlier of theone-year anniversary of the grant date or the Company’s 20192022 Annual General Meeting, while the restricted stock units vest in equal annual installments over three years, in each case upon the earlier of the anniversary of the grant date or the annual general meeting of shareholders in such anniversary year, commencing in 2019.2022. The total grant-date fair value of each of these awards is $100,001 and $100,001, respectively,approximately $180,000, based on a closing price of $3.21$5.00 on NASDAQNasdaq of the ADSs representing the Company’s Ordinary Sharesordinary shares on the date of grant.

In addition, on MayJune 14, 2018,2021, the Company awarded an option to purchase 51,671 ordinary shares48,506 Ordinary Shares and 34,26938,000 restricted stock units to Dr. Ekman in connection with his service on the Board and asNon-Executive Chairman of the Board. The option vests in full upon the earlier of theone-year anniversary of the grant date or the Company’s 20192022 Annual General Meeting, while the restricted stock units vest in equal annual installments over three years, in each case upon the earlier of the anniversary of the date of grant or the annual general meeting of shareholders in such anniversary year, commencing in 2019.2022. The total grant-date fair value of each of these awards is $110,003 and $110,003, respectively,approximately $190,000, based on a closing price of $3.21$5.00 on NASDAQNasdaq of the ADSs representing the Company’s Ordinary Sharesordinary shares on the date of grant.

Director Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation for each person who served as a non-employee member of our board of directors during the year ended December 31, 2021.

We do not provide separate compensation to our directors who are also our employees. The compensation paid into Karim Mikhail, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and John F. Thero, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, for fiscal year 2018 to the Company’snon-employee directors;2021, is set forth in “Executive Compensation.” Per Wold-Olsen was appointed in 2022 and did not serve as our director in 2021.

 

Name

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards(1)
($)
   Option
Awards(2)
($)
   Total ($)   Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards(1)(3)
($)
   Option
Awards(2)(3)
($)
   Total ($) 

Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.D.

   100,000    110,003    110,003    320,006    100,000    190,000    190,004    480,004 

Jan van Heek

   97,500    180,000    180,003    457,503 

Patrick J. O’Sullivan

   75,000    100,001    100,001    275,002    85,500    180,000    180,003    445,503 

Kristine Peterson

   72,500    100,001    100,001    272,502    84,500    180,000    180,003    444,503 

David Stack

   70,000    100,001    100,001    270,002    82,500    180,000    180,003    442,503 

Jan van Heek

   82,500    100,001    100,001    282,502 

Joseph S. Zakrzewski

   60,000    100,001    100,001    260,002    67,500    180,000    180,003    427,503 

 

(1)

The value of the stock awards reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculations for these amounts are set forth in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Form 10-K Filing.

(2)

The value of the option awards reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculations for these amounts are set forth in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onthe Original Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019.Filing.

(3)

The following table shows the amount of unexercised stock options, unvested stock unit awards and vested stock unit awards subject to deferred delivery as of December 31, 2021:

   Unexercised
Unvested Stock
Options
   Unexercised
Vested Stock
Options
   Unvested
Stock
Awards
   Vested but
Deferred
Stock Awards
 

Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.D.

   48,506    47,170    59,808    193,123 

Jan van Heek

   45,953    166,584    56,603    171,923 

Patrick J. O’Sullivan

   45,953    253,931    56,603    171,923 

Kristine Peterson

   45,953    210,431    56,603    171,923 

David Stack

   45,953    44,463    56,603    171,923 

Joseph S. Zakrzewski

   45,953    210,431    56,603    162,923 

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

In March 2013, our Board established Stock Ownership Guidelines for itsnon-employee directors. The guidelines require that eachnon-employee director maintain an equity interest in the Company at least equal to three times the amount of such director’s annual cash retainer. Equity interests that count toward the satisfaction of the ownership guidelines include the value of Ordinary Shares beneficially owned (other than unvested restricted stock)(including shares purchased on the open market or acquired upon the exercise of stock options) or issuable upon the settlement of vested DSUs. The calculation of an individual’s equity interest, however, does not include the value of stock options (whether or not vested), unvested restricted stock, and unvested restricted stock units.Non-employee directors have five years from the date of the commencement of their appointment as a director to attain these ownership levels. If anon-employee director does not meet the applicable guideline by the end of the five-year period, the director is required to hold a minimum of 50% to 100% of the shares received upon the exercise or vesting of any future equity awards until the applicable guideline is met, net of shares sold or withheld to exercise stock options and pay withholding taxes. The Remuneration Committee, however, may make exceptions for any director on whom this requirement could impose a financial hardship. As of the date of this Proxy Statement,Amendment, all of the Company’snon-employee directors have satisfied these ownership guidelines, or have time to do so.

The following table shows the amount of unexercised stock options, unvested stock unit awards and vested stock unit awards subject to deferred delivery as of December 31, 2018:

  Unexercised Unvested
Stock Options
  Unexercised Vested
Stock Options
  Unvested Stock Awards  Vested but Deferred
Stock Awards
 

Lars G. Ekman, M.D., Ph.D.

  51,671  320,138   54,622   123,584 

Patrick J. O’Sullivan

  46,973  207,495   47,806   110,101 

Kristine Peterson

  46,973  282,495   47,806   110,101 

David Stack

  46,973  177,495   47,806   110,101 

Jan van Heek

  46,973  267,495   47,806   110,101 

Joseph S. Zakrzewski

  46,973  1,723,162   47,806   101,101 

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements, evaluates auditor performance, manages relations with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and evaluates policies and procedures relating to internal control systems. The Audit Committee operates under a written Audit Committee charter that has been adopted by the Board. All members of the Audit Committee currently meet the independence and qualification standards for Audit Committee membership set forth in the listing standards provided by NASDAQ and the SEC, and the Board has determined that Audit Committee Member Jan van Heek is an “audit committee financial expert,” as the SEC has defined that term in Item 407 of RegulationS-K.

The Audit Committee members are not professional accountants or auditors. The members’ functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee serves a board-level oversight role in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the auditors on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the auditors, and the experience of the Audit Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The Company’s management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and reporting process, including the Company’s system of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed with management the audited financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021. This review included a discussion of the quality and the acceptability of the Company’s financial reporting, including the nature and extent of disclosures in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. The Audit Committee also reviewed the progress and results of the testing of the design and effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Audit Committee also reviewed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, their judgments as to the quality and the acceptability of the Company’s financial reporting and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Committee by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) AU380,, including the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, and SEC RegulationS-X Rule 207,2-07,Communication with Audit Committees. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence from management and the Company, including the matters required by the applicable rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

In addition to the matters specified above, the Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope, plans and estimated costs of their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent registered public accounting firm periodically, with and without management present, to discuss the results of the independent registered public accounting firm’s examinations, the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and the independent registered public accounting firm’s reviews of the quarterly financial statements, and drafts of the quarterly and annual reports.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements should be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,

Jan van Heek, (Chairman)Chairman until May 2022

Kristine Peterson

Patrick J. O’Sullivan

*

Ms. Enright was appointed to the Audit Committee as Chairwoman on May 16, 2022, after the reviews, discussions and determinations described above were conducted.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, shareholder proposals intended to be included in the 20202023 Annual General Meeting proxy materials must be received by the Secretary of the Company no later than December 27, 2019,January 24, 2023, or otherwise as permitted by applicable law;provided, however, that if the 20202023 Annual General Meeting date is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the 20192022 Annual General Meeting, then shareholders must submit proposals within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials. Proposals received after this timeframe will not be included in the Company’s proxy materials for the 20202023 Annual General Meeting. The form and substance of these proposals must satisfy the requirements established by the Company’s Articles, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and the SEC, and the timing for the submission of any such proposals may be subject to change as a result of changes in SEC rules and regulations.

The Company is registered in England & Wales and therefore subject to the Companies Act, which, together with our Articles of Association and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, governs the processes for shareholder proposals at the 2023 Annual Meeting. Under Section 338 of the Companies Act, in order for a shareholder proposal to be presented atincluded in a notice of an Annual General Meeting,annual general meeting, such proposal must have been requisitioned either by shareholders representing 5% of the voting rights of all members having a right to vote on such proposal at the Annual General Meetingannual general meeting or by at least 100 shareholders who have a right to vote on such proposal at the relevant Annual General Meetingannual general meeting and who hold shares in the Company on which there has been paid up an average sum, per member, of at least £100. Such proposal must have been signed or otherwise authenticated by all requisitionists and submitted to the Company not later than (1) six weeks before the Annual General Meetingannual general meeting to which the requests relate, or (2) if later, the time at which notice of that meeting is given by the Company.

Additionally, shareholders who intend to nominate a director to be elected at the 2020 Annual General Meetingannual general meeting must provide the Secretary of the Company with written notice of such nomination between 7seven and 42 days prior to the date of such meeting, together with written notice signed by the director nominee regarding his or her willingness to be elected. Any shareholder seeking to recommend a director candidate or any director candidate who wishes to be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the committee that recommends a slate of nominees to the Board for election at each annual general meeting, must also provide the Secretary of the Company with:with the following information between seven and 42 days prior to the date of such meeting: the name and address of the shareholder seeking to recommend a director candidate; a representation that the shareholder is a record holder of the Company’s securities (or, if the shareholder is not a record holder, evidence of ownership in accordance with Rule14a-8(b)(2) of the Exchange Act); the name, age, business and residential address, educational background, current principal occupation or employment for the preceding five full fiscal years of the proposed director candidate; a description of the qualifications and background of the proposed director candidate, which addresses the minimum qualifications and other criteria for Board membership approved by the Board from time to time; a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and the proposed director candidate; the consent of the proposed director candidate to be named in the proxy statement relating to the Company’s annual general meeting and to serve as a director if elected at such annual general meeting; and any other information regarding the proposed director candidate that is required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to SEC rules, if then required. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all director candidates who

To comply with these requirements and will evaluate these candidates using the criteria described aboveuniversal proxy rules (once effective), shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the caption, “NominationSecurities Exchange Act of Directors.” Director candidates who are then approved by the Board will be included in the Company’s proxy statement for that annual general meeting.1934 no later than April 28, 2023.

DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS

Our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, including audited financial statements, accompanies this Proxy Statement. Copies of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the exhibits thereto are available from the Company without charge upon written request of a shareholder. Copies of these materials are also available online through the SEC atwww.sec.gov. The Company may satisfy SEC rules regarding delivery of proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report, by delivering a single set of proxy materials to an address shared by two or more Company shareholders. This delivery method can result in meaningful cost savings for the Company. In order to take advantage of this opportunity, the Company may deliver only a single set of proxy materials to multiple shareholders who share an address, unless contrary instructions are received prior to the mailing date. Similarly, if you share an address with another shareholder and have received multiple copies of our proxy materials, you may write or call us at the address and phone number below to request delivery of a single copy of the proxy materials in the future. We undertake to deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of the proxy materials, as requested, to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the proxy materials was delivered. If you hold Ordinary Shares as a record shareholder and prefer to receive separate copies of proxy materials either now or in the future, please contact the Company’s investor relations department at Amarin Corporation plc, c/o Amarin Pharma, Inc., 1430 Route 206, Bedminster, NJ 07921440 US Highway 22, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807 or by telephone at (908)719-1315. If you hold Ordinary Shares in the form of ADSs through the Depositary or hold Ordinary Shares through a brokerage firm or bank and you prefer to receive separate copies of proxy materials either now or in the future, please contact the Depositary, your brokerage firm or bank, as applicable.

EACH ORDINARY SHAREHOLDER IS URGED TO COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN

AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY.

Appendix A

AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

2020 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The Amarin Corporation plc 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by the Board of Directors and shareholders of Amarin Corporation plc as follows:

Section 2(w) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

“ISO Limit” shall mean 10,000,000 Shares, subject to adjustment as provided in the Plan and subject to the provisions of Section 422 or 424 of the Code or any successor provisions.

Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to increase the total number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan by 10,000,000 shares, such that Section 4(a) of the Plan, as so amended, shall read in its entirety as follows:

Section 4. Shares Available for Awards

(a)

Shares Available. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the number of Shares in respect of which Awards may be made under this Plan on any day shall not exceed the sum of (i) 30,000,000 Shares and (ii) the number of Shares that remain available for grants under the 2011 Plan as of the July 13, 2020 (“the Plan Limit”). Shares to be issued under the Plan may be either authorized but unissued Shares, or Shares acquired in the open market or otherwise. If any award over Shares granted under this Plan, the 2011 Plan or the 2002 Plan expires or is forfeited, surrendered, canceled or otherwise terminated in whole or in part without Shares being issued (“Lapsed Award”), then the Shares subject to such Lapsed Award may, at the discretion of the Committee, be made available for subsequent grants under the Plan; provided, however, that Shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an Option or settlement of an Award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding shall not be considered a Lapsed Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of Shares available for granting Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall not exceed the ISO Limit.

ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: May 22, 2022

ADOPTED BY SHAREHOLDERS: , 2022

Appendix B

LOGO

AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

A. Purpose

1.

The Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is appointed by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Amarin Corporation plc (the “Company”) to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s financial statements.14

2.

The Committee shall assist the Board in overseeing (a) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (b) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (c) the external auditors’ qualifications and independence; and (d) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function (if applicable) and external auditors.

B. Membership

1.

The Committee shall be composed of a chairman and at least 2 other members, each of whom shall be a member of and appointed by the Board.

2.

Each member of the Committee shall meet, or qualify for the exceptions from, the independence requirements of the rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the Market-place Rules of NASD. If any member of the Committee serves pursuant to such exceptions, the Company shall disclose in its next annual report such member’s relationship to the Company and the basis for the Board’s determination to use such exceptions.15

3.

Each member of the Committee must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.16

4.

At least one member of the Committee shall be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).17

5.

No member of the Committee may have participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any of its current subsidiaries at any time during the past three years.18

6.

The Board shall appoint the Committee chairman. The chairman of the Board shall not be eligible to be appointed as chairman of the Committee.

7.

The Company Secretary or a nominee shall be the secretary of the Committee.

C. Meetings

1.

The Committee shall meet as often as it determines necessary and in any case on at least a quarterly basis.

14

See Nasdaq Rules 4350(d)(1)(C) and 4350(d)(2)(B).

15

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(2)(B).

16

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(iv).

17

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(2)(A).

18

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(iii).

2.

A meeting of the Committee may be called by any member of the Committee, by the chairman of the Board, by internal (if applicable) or external auditors or the chief financial officer of the Company.

3.

Notice of each meeting of the Committee confirming the venue, time and date together with an agenda of items to be discussed shall, unless otherwise agreed by all concerned, be forwarded to each member of the Committee not fewer than 3 working days prior to the date of the meeting.

4.

The quorum for meetings shall be two.

5.

In the absence of the Committee chairman and/or an appointed deputy, the remaining members present shall elect one of their number to chair the meeting.

6.

The Committee shall conduct its business as it sees fit. The provisions of the Company’s articles of association regarding the proceedings of the directors shall apply equally to the proceedings of the Committee.

7.

The Committee may call upon the Chief Financial Officer, representatives at the external auditors or other officers and employees of the Company to attend and speak at meetings of the Committee.

8.

The Committee or its chairman shall regularly report to the Board regarding such matters as the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the relationship with and performance and independence of the external auditors and the performance of the internal audit function (if applicable).

9.

The secretary of the Committee shall keep appropriate records of all meetings of the Committee with appropriate minutes of the proceedings and resolutions made.

10.

Copies of the minutes of the meetings shall be circulated to all members of the Committee and to the chairman of the Board; any director may upon request to the secretary of the Committee, as long as there is no conflict of interest, obtain copies of the Committee’s agenda and minutes.

D. Duties

The Committee shall:

1.

be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the external auditors (including resolution of disagreements between management and the external auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company; the external auditors must report directly to the Committee;19

2.

set clear hiring policies for the employees or former employees of the external auditors;20

3.

consider and recommend to the Board the appointment of internal auditors (if applicable);

4.

pre-approve all audit services (and associated fees) as well as any permitted non-audit services (and associated fees), subject to the de minimus exception provided by the Exchange Act;21 the Committee may delegate to one or more designated members the authority to grant such pre-approvals, provided that decisions of such member(s) are presented to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting;22

19

See Rule 10A-3(b)(2) under the Exchange Act.

20

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c)(iii)(G).

21

See Section 10A(i)(1) of the Exchange Act.

22

See Section 10A(i)(3) of the Exchange Act.

5.

discuss with the external auditors such issues as compliance with accounting standards and any proposals which the external auditors have made vis-a-vis the Company’s auditing standards, as well as any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response;23

6.

review the Company’s financial reporting and internal control (from 1 January 2007) procedures, including the adequacy of such controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies;24

7.

review any reports released by the internal auditors (if applicable);

8.

review the management of financial matters, including analyses prepared by management and or the external auditors setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative generally accepted accounting principle (“GAAP”) methods on the financial statements;25

9.

review the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company;26

10.

focus upon the independence and objectivity of the external auditors, including obtaining from the external auditors a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the external auditors and the Company, engaging in a dialogue with the external auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the external auditors and taking, or recommending that the full Board take, appropriate action to oversee the independence of the external auditors;27

11.

review and evaluate the qualifications and performance of the external auditors;

12.

focus on the responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Company’s internal auditors (if applicable);

13.

review the consistency of accounting policies both on a year to year basis and across the Company/Group;

14.

review major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles;28

15.

review with management and the external auditors the Company’s annual financial statements where not reviewed by the Board as a whole; in the light of the above, make whatever recommendations to the Board which it deems appropriate (including whether the audited financial statements should be included in the Company’s annual report); and, if necessary or desirable, compile a report to shareholders to be included in the Company’s annual report and accounts;

16.

discuss the Company’s earnings press releases, including any use of “pro forma” or “adjusted” non- GAAP information, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;29

17.

give due consideration to the requirements of the rules of any applicable stock exchange or association;

18.

be responsible for co-ordination of the internal (if applicable) and external auditors;

19.

ensure that the Head of Internal Audit (if applicable) and external auditors has the right of direct access to the chairman of the Committee;

23

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c)(iii)(F).

24

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c).

25

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c).

26

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c).

27

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(1)(B).

28

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c).

29

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c).

20.

ensure that the chairman of the Committee or, in his absence, an appointed deputy attends the Company’s annual general meeting prepared to respond to any shareholder questions on the Committee’s report and activities;

21.

establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the listed issuer regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;30

22.

review and recommend to the Board for approval all related party transactions to the extent required by applicable laws or stock exchange rules;31

23.

discuss policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;32

24.

evaluate the Committee’s own performance on an annual basis; and

25.

review and reassess the adequacy of these Audit Committee Terms of Reference on an annual basis and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.33

E. Authority

The Committee shall have the power and the right to:

1.

seek any necessary information it requires from any employee of the Company in order to fulfil its duties; and

2.

obtain outside legal and any other professional advice, at the Company’s expense, which might be necessary for the fulfilment of its duties.

F. Limitation of Committee’s Role

While the Committee has the duties and authority set forth in this Audit Committee Terms of Reference, the fundamental responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and disclosures rests with management and the external auditors.

Approved December 15, 2009

30

See Section 10A(m)(4) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10A-(3)(b)(3) thereunder.

31

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(h).

32

See NYSE Rule 303A.07(c)(iii)(D).

33

See Nasdaq Rule 4350(d)(1).

Appendix C

LOGO

Amarin Corporation plc

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter

I.

General Statement of Purpose

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Nominating Committee”) of Amarin Corporation plc (the “Company”) on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommending that the Board select the director nominees for election at each annual meeting of shareholders.

II.

Nominating Committee Composition

The number of individuals serving on the Nominating Committee shall be fixed by the Board from time to time but shall consist of no fewer than two members, each of whom shall satisfy the independence standards established pursuant to Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.

The members of the Nominating Committee shall be appointed annually by the Board and may be replaced or removed by the Board at any time with or without cause. Resignation or removal of the Director from the Board, for whatever reason, shall automatically constitute resignation or removal, as applicable, from this committee. Vacancies occurring, for whatever reason, may be filled by the Board. The Board shall designate one member of the Nominating Committee to serve as Chairman of the Nominating Committee.

III.

Meetings

The Nominating Committee generally is to meet no less than two times per year in person or by conference telephone or other communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other, with any additional meetings as deemed necessary or appropriate by the Nominating Committee. A majority of the members of the Nominating Committee shall constitute a quorum for purposes of holding a meeting and the Nominating Committee may act by a vote of a majority of members present at such meeting. In lieu of a meeting, the Nominating Committee may act by unanimous written consent.

Unless otherwise provided for in this Charter, the procedure for meetings of the Nominating Committee shall be governed by the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association which regulate the meetings of the Board.

IV.

Nominating Committee Activities

The Nominating Committee’s purpose and responsibilities shall be to:

A.

Review of Charter

Review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually and submit any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

B.

Annual Performance Evaluation of the Nominating Committee

Perform an annual performance evaluation of the Nominating Committee and report to the Board on the results of such evaluation.

C.

Selection of New Directors

Recommend to the Board criteria for Board and committee membership, which shall include a description of any specific, minimum qualifications that the Nominating Committee believes must be met by a Nominating Committee- recommended nominee, and a description of any specific qualities or skills that the Nominating Committee believes are necessary for one or more of the Company’s directors to possess, and annually reassess the adequacy of such criteria and submit any proposed changes to the Board for approval. The current criteria for Board membership are attached to this Charter as Exhibit A.

Establish a policy with regard to the consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders. The current policy is that the Nominating Committee will review and consider any director candidates who have been recommended by shareholders in compliance with the procedures established from time to time by the Nominating Committee and set forth in this Charter.

Establish procedures to be followed by shareholders in submitting recommendations for director candidates to the Nominating Committee. The current procedures to be followed by shareholders are set forth below:

1.

All shareholder recommendations for director candidates must be submitted to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company, who will forward all recommendations to the Nominating Committee.

2.

All shareholder recommendations for director candidates must be submitted to the Company not less than 120 calendar days prior to the date on which the Company’s proxy statement was released to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting.

3.

All shareholder recommendations for director candidates must include the following information:

a.

The name and address of record of the shareholder.

b.

A representation that the shareholder is a record holder of the Company’s securities, or if the shareholder is not a record holder, evidence of ownership in accordance with Rule 14a-8(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

c.

The name, age, business and residential address, educational background, current principal occupation or employment, and principal occupation or employment for the preceding five (5) full fiscal years of the proposed director candidate.

d.

A description of the qualifications and background of the proposed director candidate which addresses the minimum qualifications and other criteria for Board membership approved by the Board from time to time and set forth in this Charter.

e.

A description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and the proposed director candidate.

f.

The consent of the proposed director candidate (i) to be named in the proxy statement relating to the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders and (ii) to serve as a director if elected at such annual meeting.

g.

Any other information regarding the proposed director candidate that is required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, if then required.

Establish a process for identifying and evaluating nominees for the Board, including nominees recommended by shareholders. The current process for identifying and evaluating nominees for the Board is as follows:

1.

The Nominating Committee may solicit recommendations from any or all of the following sources: non-management directors, the Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, third-party search firms, or any other source it deems appropriate.

2.

The Nominating Committee will review and evaluate the qualifications of any such proposed director candidate, and conduct inquiries it deems appropriate.

3.

The Nominating Committee will evaluate all such proposed director candidates in the same manner, with no regard to the source of the initial recommendation of such proposed director candidate.

4.

In identifying and evaluating proposed director candidates, the Nominating Committee may consider, in addition to the minimum qualifications and other criteria for Board membership approved by the Board from time to time, all facts and circumstances that it deems appropriate or advisable, including, among other things, the skills of the proposed director candidate, his or her depth and breadth of business experience or other background characteristics, his or her independence and the needs of the Board.

Upon identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with the minimum qualifications and other criteria approved by the Board from time to time, recommend that the Board select the director nominees for election at each annual meeting of shareholders; provided that, if the Company is legally required by contract or otherwise to provide third parties with the ability to nominate individuals for election as a member of the Board (pursuant, for example, to the rights of holders of preferred stock to elect directors upon a dividend default or in accordance with shareholder agreements or management agreements), the selection and nomination of such director nominees shall be governed by such contract or other arrangement and shall not be the responsibility of the Nominating Committee.

Recommend that the Board select the directors for appointment to committees of the Board.

Review all shareholder nominations and proposals submitted to the Company (including any director nominations made by shareholders pursuant to Rule 14a- 11 (or any successor rule) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise, and any proposal relating to the procedures for making nominations or electing directors), determine whether the nomination or proposal was submitted in a timely manner and, in the case of a director nomination, whether the nomination and the nominee satisfy all applicable eligibility requirements, and recommend to the Board appropriate action on each such nomination or proposal.

D.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Review and reassess the adequacy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

E.

Evaluation of Board of Directors and Management

Oversee annual evaluation of the Board and its committees and the Company’s management for the prior fiscal year.

F.

Matters Relating to Retention and Termination of Search Firms to Identify Director Candidates

At the Nominating Committee’s option, retain and terminate any search firm to assist in identifying director candidates. The Nominating Committee shall also have authority to approve any such search firm’s fees and other retention terms.

V.

General

The Nominating Committee may establish and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more of its members, when the Nominating Committee deems it appropriate to do so in order to carry out its responsibilities.

The Nominating Committee shall make regular reports to the Board concerning areas of the Nominating Committee’s responsibility.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Nominating Committee shall be entitled to rely upon advice and information that it receives in its discussions and communications with management and such experts, advisors and professionals with whom the Nominating Committee may consult. The Nominating Committee shall have the authority to request that any officer or employee of the Company, the Company’s outside legal counsel, the Company’s independent auditor or any other professional retained by the Company to render advice to the Company attend a meeting of the Nominating Committee or meet with any members of or advisors to the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee shall also have the authority to engage legal, accounting or other advisors to provide it with advice and information in connection with carrying out its responsibilities and shall have sole authority to approve any such advisor’s fees and other retention terms.

The Nominating Committee may perform such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time.

ADOPTED: October 7, 2013

EXHIBIT A

Board Membership Criteria

The Nominating Committee believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to obtain highly qualified individuals to serve on the Board.

At a minimum, the Nominating Committee must be satisfied that each Nominating Committee-recommended nominee meets the following minimum qualifications:

x

The nominee shall have experience at a strategic or policymaking level in a business, government, non-profit or academic organization of high standing.

x

The nominee shall be highly accomplished in his or her respective field, with superior credentials and recognition.

x

The nominee shall be well regarded in the community and shall have a long-term reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards.

x

The nominee shall have sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve.

x

To the extent such nominee serves or has previously served on other boards, the nominee shall have a demonstrated history of actively contributing at board meetings.

In addition to the minimum qualifications for each nominee set forth above, the Nominating Committee shall recommend that the Board select persons for nomination to help ensure that:

x

A majority of the Board shall be “independent” in accordance with the standards established pursuant to Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.

x

Each of its Audit, Remuneration and Nominating Committees shall be comprised entirely of independent directors.

x

At least one member of the Audit Committee shall have such experience, education and other qualifications necessary to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Finally, in addition to any other standards the Nominating Committee may deem appropriate from time to time for the overall structure and composition of the Board, the Nominating Committee may consider the following factors when recommending that the Board select persons for nomination:

x

Whether the nominee has direct experience in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology or healthcare industries or in the markets in which the Company operates.

x

Whether the nominee, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience.

Approved October 7, 2013

Appendix D

LOGO

AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

A. Membership

1.

The Committee shall comprise of a chairman and at least 2 other members, each of whom shall be a member of and appointed by the Board.

2.

The members of the Committee shall be non-executive directors who are independent of management and free from any business or other relationship which could interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement; and subject to any applicable exceptions, each member of the Committee shall also satisfy the independence standards established pursuant to Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules.

3.

The Board shall appoint the Committee chairman. In the absence of the Committee chairman and/or an appointed deputy, the remaining members present shall elect one of their number to chair the meeting.

4.

The Company Secretary or a nominee shall act as the secretary of the Committee.

B. Meetings

1.

The Committee shall meet formally at least twice a year.

2.

A meeting of the Committee may be called by any member of the Committee or by the Secretary.

3.

The quorum for meetings shall be two.

4.

Notice of each meeting of the Committee, confirming the venue, time and date, and enclosing an agenda of items to be discussed shall, unless otherwise agreed by all concerned, be forwarded to each member of the Committee not fewer than 3 working days prior to the date of the meeting.

5.

The chief executive and the Company Secretary shall have the right to attend and speak at meetings of the Committee; others may be called upon or shall be able to speak by prior arrangement with the chairman of the Committee.

6.

In the absence of the Committee chairman or any appointed deputy, the remaining members present shall elect one of their number to chair the meeting.

7.

The Secretary shall keep appropriate records of all meetings of the Committee as well as minutes of the proceedings and all decisions made.

8.

No Committee attendee shall participate in any discussion or decision on their own remuneration, fees or terms or conditions of service.

C. Duties

The Committee shall:

1.

determine and agree with the Board the framework or broad policy for the remuneration of the Company’s or Group’s chief executive, the chairman of the Company and such other members of the executive management as it is designated to consider. The remuneration of non-executive directors shall be a matter for the Board excluding non-executive directors;

2.

in determining such policy, take into account factors which it deems necessary or appropriate. The objective of such policy shall be to ensure that members of the executive management of the company are provided with appropriate incentives to encourage enhanced performance and are, in a fair and responsible manner, rewarded for their individual contributions to the success of the company;

3.

determine targets for any performance related pay schemes operated by the Company for which senior executives are eligible;

4.

within the terms of the agreed policy, determine the total individual remuneration packages of each executive director including, where appropriate, bonuses, incentive payments and share options;

5.

determine the policy for and scope of pension arrangements, service agreements for the executive management team, termination payments and compensation commitments;

6.

in determining such packages and arrangements, give due regard to the comments and recommendations of any applicable codes of practice, the rules of any applicable stock exchange, and any legal requirements applicable to such determination;

7.

oversee any major changes in employee benefit structures throughout the Company or Group;

8.

vet and authorise the reimbursement of any claims for expenses from the chief executive and chairman of the Company in excess of £10,000;

9.

ensure that provisions regarding disclosure of remuneration for the purposes of the rules and regulation of any applicable stock exchange are complied with;

10.

review the annual report of the Board’s remuneration policy which will form part of the Company’s annual report and accounts;

11.

consider each year whether circumstances are such that the shareholders at the AGM should be invited to approve the remuneration policy which has been set out in the Company’s annual report and Accounts;

12.

ensure that the chairman of the Committee or, in his absence, an appointed deputy attends the company’s AGM to answer shareholders’ questions about directors’ remuneration.

D. Authority

The Committee is authorized, on behalf of the Board, to do any of the following, as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate in its discretion:

1.

Seek any information it requires from any employee of the Company in order to perform its duties.

2.

Retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants, legal counsel and/or other advisers; provided that:

a.

The Committee is authorized to, and must, have direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser retained by the Committee and the Company must provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for payment of reasonable compensation to any such compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser; and

b.

Before any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser (other than (1) in-house legal counsel or (2) any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser whose role is limited to the following activities for which no disclosure would be required under Item 407(e)(3)(iii) of Regulation S-K under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended: (i) consulting on any broad-based plan that does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation, in favor of executive officers or directors of the Company, and that is available generally to all salaried employees or (ii) providing information that either is not customized for a particular company or that is customized based on parameters that are not developed by the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and about which the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser does not provide advice) is selected by, or provides advice to, the Committee, the Committee shall take into consideration the following factors:

 i.

The provision of other services to the Company by the person that employs the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser;

ii.

The amount of fees received from the Company by the person that employs the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser, as a percentage of the total revenue of the person that employs the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser;

iii.

The policies and procedures of the person that employs the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest;

iv.

Any business or personal relationship of the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser with a member of the Committee;

 v.

Any shares of the Company owned by the compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser; and

vi.

Any business or personal relationship of the compensation consultant, legal counsel, other adviser or the person employing the adviser with an executive officer of the Company.

Approved October 7/8, 2013

PROXY FORM

AMARIN CORPORATION PLC

For use at the Annual General Meeting to be held at The Merrion Hotel, Upper Merrion Street,the Dublin offices of Arthur Cox LLP, Ten Earlsfort

Terrace, Dublin 2, D02 T380, Ireland at 2:3:00 p.m. on Monday, 20 May 2019.June 27, 2022.

 

I/We  

(Name in full block capitals please)

 

(Name in full block capitals please)
of  

being (a) member(s) of Amarin Corporation plc (the“Company”) hereby appoint the Chairman of the meeting or (see note 6 below)

being (a) member(s) of Amarin Corporation plc (the “Company”) hereby appoint the Chairman of the meeting or (see note 6 below)

 

as my/our proxy to attend, speak and vote for me/us and on my/our behalf as identified by an “X” in the appropriate box below at the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held at 3:00 p.m. on June 27, 2022 and at any adjournment of the meeting. This form of proxy relates to the resolutions referred to below.

[I/We instruct my/our proxy to vote as follows:]

as my/our proxy to attend, speak and vote for me/us and on my/our behalf as identified by an “X” in the appropriate box below at the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held at 2:00 p.m. on Monday, 20 May 2019 and at any adjournment of the meeting. This form of proxy relates to the resolutions referred to below.
I/We instruct my/our proxy to vote as follows:

 

  
Resolutions  For  Against  

Abstain

(see note 2)

  

Discretionary

(see note 3)

 1.   

1.

Ordinary resolution tore-elect Mr. Jan van HeekKarim Mikhail as a director.

            
 2. 

2.

Ordinary resolution tore-elect Ms. Kristine PetersonMr. Per Wold-Olsen as a director.

            
 3. 

3.

Ordinary resolution (advisory,to non-bindingre-elect vote) to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers.”

Ms. Erin Enright as a director.
            
 4. 

4.

Ordinary resolution to re-elect Mr. Alfonso Zulueta as a director.

5.

Ordinary resolution (advisory, non-binding vote) to approve the compensation of the Company’s “named executive officers.”

6.

Ordinary resolution to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditors of the Company to hold office until the conclusion of the next general meeting at which accounts are laid before the Company and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company to fix the auditors’ remuneration.

            
 5.

Ordinary resolution to generally and unconditionally reauthorize the Board of Directors of the Company to exercise all powers of the Company to allot shares in the Company or grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares of the Company up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000.

     
 6.

7.

 

SpecialOrdinary resolution to subjectadopt and approve the proposed amendment to the passing of Resolution No. 5, disapply statutorypre-emption rights otherwise applicable to shares in the Company allotted by the Board of Directors, up to an aggregate nominal amount of £148,000,000.

Company’s 2020 Stock Incentive Plan.
            


Dated this2019

 

    Signature(s)

Dated
  

Signature(s)

Notes:

 

1.

Please indicate with an “X” in the appropriate box how you wish the proxy to vote. In the absence of any indication, the proxy will exercise his/her discretion as to whether and how he/she votes. The proxy may also vote or abstain from voting as he/she thinks fit on any other business which may properly come before the meeting.

 

2.

If you mark the box “abstain”, it will mean that your proxy will abstain from voting and, accordingly, your vote will not be counted either for or against the relevant resolution.


3.

If you mark the box “discretionary”, the proxy can vote as it chooses or can decide not to vote at all.

 

4.

The form of proxy should be signed and dated by the member or his attorney duly authorised in writing. If the appointer is a corporation this proxy should be under seal or under the hand of an officer or attorney duly authorised. Any alteration made to the form of proxy should be initialed.

 

5.

To be valid, this form of proxy, together with a duly signed and dated power of attorney or any other authority (if any) under which it is executed (or a notarially certified copy of such power of attorney or other authority) must be signed and dated and lodged at the Company’s registrars at the address below, so as to be received by 14:3:00 p.m. on Thursday, 16 May 2019.June 23, 2022.

 

6.

A proxy need not be a memberthe Chairman of the Company.meeting. A member may appoint a proxy of his/her own choice. If you wish to appoint someone else please deleteto act as your proxy, you may strike out the words “the Chairman of the meeting” and insert the name of the person whom you wish to appoint to act as your proxy in the space provided. TheAll amendments to this form must be initialed. If you sign and return this form with no name inserted in the space provided, the Chairman of the meeting will act asbe deemed to be your proxy, whether or not such deletion is made, if no other name is inserted.proxy. A member may appoint more than one proxy in relation to the meeting provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise rights attached to different shares. A proxy need not be a member of the Company but must attend the meeting. Where someone other than the Chairman is appointed as a proxy, the member appointing him/her is responsible for ensuring that they attend the meeting and are aware of his/her voting intentions. If a member wishes his/her proxy to speak on his/her behalf at the meeting, he/she will need to appoint someone other than the Chairman and give his/her instructions directly to them. Given the continued uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the possibility of new measures and restrictions being imposed in Ireland in the future, you are encouraged to appoint the Chairman of the meeting as your proxy.

 

7.

In the case of joint holders, signature of any one holder will be sufficient, but the names of all the joint holders should be stated. The vote of the senior holder (according to the order in which the names stand in the register of members in respect of the holding) who tenders a vote in person or by proxy will be accepted to the exclusion of the vote(s) of the other joint holder(s).

 

8.

Completion and return of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending, speaking and voting at the meeting and votingor any adjournment thereof in person. If a proxy is appointed and the member attends the meeting in person, the proxy appointment will automatically be terminated.

Address for lodgment of Proxies:

Equiniti

Aspect House

Spencer Road

Lancing

West Sussex

United Kingdom

BN99 6DA